Subscribe
to CF
Be
first to know
Read our AAA review
from Catholic Culture
Our Mission
To
bring Jesus Christ; the Way, the Truth and the Life; to all who will follow,
according to scripture and tradition, per the Magisterium
of the Roman Catholic Church.
While you visit!
Listen
to
Radio
For the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. |
JOHN CASSIAN
THE THIRD PART OF THE CONFERENCES
XVIII. CONFERENCE OF ABBOT PIAMUN
ON THE THREE SORTS OF MONKS
CHAPTER I.
How we came to Diolcos and were received by Abbot Piamun. (1)
AFTER visiting and conversing with those three Elders, whose Conferences we
have at the instance of our brother Eucherius tried to describe, as we were
still more ardently desirous to seek out the further parts of Egypt, in which
a larger and more perfect company of saints dwelt, we came -- urged not so
much by the necessities of our journey as by the desire of visiting the saints
who were dwelling there -- to a village named Diolcos, (2) lying on one of
the seven mouths of the river Nile. For when we heard of very many and very
celebrated monasteries rounded by the ancient fathers, like most eager merchants,
at once we undertook the journey on an uncertain quest, urged on by the hope
of greater gain. And when we wandered about there for some long time and fixed
our curious eyes on those mountains of virtue conspicuous for their lofty height,
the gaze of those around first singled out Abbot Piamun, the senior of all
the anchorites living there and their presbyter, as if he were some tall lighthouse.
For he was set on the top of a high mountain like that city in the gospel,
(3) and at once shed his light on our faces, whose virtues and miracles, which
were wrought by him under our very eyes, Divine Grace thus bearing witness
to his excellence, if we are not to exceed the plan and limits of this volume,
we feel we must pass over in silence. For we promised to commit to memory what
we could recollect, not of the miracles of God, but of the institutes and pursuits
of the saints, so as to supply our readers merely with necessary instruction
for the perfect life, and not with matter for idle and useless admiration without
any correction of their faults. And so when Abbot Piamun had received us with
welcome, and had refreshed us with becoming kindness, as he understood that
we were not of the same country, he first asked us anxiously whence or why
we had visited Egypt, and when he discovered that we had come thither from
a monastery in Syria out of desire for perfection he began as follows: --
CHAPTER II.
The words of Abbot Piamun, how monks who were novices ought to be taught by
the example of their elders.
WHATEVER man, my children, is desirous to attain skill in any art, unless
he gives himself up with the utmost pains and carefulness to the study of that
system which he is anxious to learn, and observes the rules and orders of the
best masters of that work or science, is indulging in a vain hope to reach
by idle wishes any similarity to those whose pains and diligence he avoids
copying. For we know that some have come from your country to these parts,
only to go round the monasteries for the sake of getting to know the brethren,
not meaning to adopt the rules and regulations, for the sake of which they
travelled hither, nor to retire to the cells and aim at carrying out in action
what they had learnt by sight or by teaching. And these people retained their
character and pursuits to which they had grown accustomed, and, as is thrown
in their teeth by some, are held to have changed their country not for the
sake of their profit, but owing to the need of escaping want. For in the obstinacy
of their stubborn mind, they not only could learn nothing, but actually would
not stay any longer in these parts. For if they changed neither their method
of fasting, nor their scheme of Psalms, nor even the fashion of their garments,
what else could we think that they were after in this country, except only
the supply of their victuals.
CHAPTER III.
How the juniors ought not to discuss the orders of the seniors.
WHEREFORE if, as we believe, the cause of God has drawn you to try to copy
our knowledge, you must utterly ignore all the rules by which your early beginnings
were trained, and must with all humility follow whatever you see our Elders
do or teach. And do not be troubled or drawn away and diverted from imitating
it, even if for the moment the cause or reason of any deed or action is not
clear to you, because if men have good and simple ideas on all things and are
anxious faithfully to copy whatever they see taught or done by their Elders,
instead of discussing it, then the knowledge of all things will follow through
experience of the work. But he will never enter into the reason of the truth,
who begins to learn by discussion, because as the enemy sees that he trusts
to his own judgment rather than to that of the fathers' he easily urges him
on so far till those things which are especially useful and helpful seem to
him unnecessary or injurious, and the crafty foe so plays upon his presumption,
that by obstinately clinging to his own opinion he persuades himself that only
that is holy, which he himself in his pig-headed error thinks to be good and
right.
CHAPTER IV.
Of the three sorts of monks which there are in Egypt.
WHEREFORE yOU should first hear how or whence the system and beginning of
our order took its rise. For only then can a man at all effectually be trained
in any art he may wish, and be urged on to practise it diligently, when he
has learnt the glory of its authors and founders. There are three kinds of
monks in Egypt, of which two are admirable, the third is a poor sort of thing
and by all means to be avoided. The first is that of the coenobites, who live
together in a congregation and are governed by the direction of a single Elder:
and of this kind there is the largest number of monks dwelling throughout the
whole of Egypt. The second is that of the anchorites, who were first trained
in the coenobium and then being made perfect in practical life chose the recesses
of the desert: and in this order we also hope to gain a place. The third is
the reprehensible one of the Sarabaites. (1) And of these we will discourse
more fully one by one in order. Of these three orders then you ought, as we
said, first to know about the founders. For at once from this there may arise
either a hatred for the order which is to be avoided, or a longing for that
which is to be followed, because each way is sure to carry the man who follows
it, to that end which its author and discoverer has reached.
CHAPTER V.
Of the founders who originated the order of coenobites.
AND so
the system of coenobites took its rise in the days of the preaching of the
Apostles. For such was
all that multitude of believers in Jerusalem,
which is thus described in the Acts of the Apostles: "But the multitude
of believers was of one heart and one soul, neither said any of them that any
of the things which he possessed was his own, but they had all things common.
They sold their possessions and property and divided them to all, as any man
had need." And again: "For neither was there any among them that
lacked; for as many as possessed fields or houses, sold them and brought the
price of the things that they sold and laid them before the feet of the Apostles:
and distribution was made to every man as he had need." (2) The whole
Church, I say, was then such as now are those few who can be found with difficulty
in coenobia. But when at the death of the Apostles the multitude of believers
began to wax cold, and especially that multitude which had come to the faith
of Christ from diverse foreign nations, from whom the Apostles out of consideration
for the infancy of their faith and their ingrained heathen habits, required
nothing more than that they should" abstain from things sacrificed to
idols and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood," (1)
and so that liberty which was conceded to the Gentiles because of the weakness
of their newly-born faith, had by degrees begun to mar the perfection of that
Church which existed at Jerusalem, and the fervour of that early faith cooled
down owing to the daily increasing number both of natives and foreigners, and
not only those who had accepted the faith of Christ, but even those who were
the leaders of the Church relaxed somewhat of that strictness. For some fancying
that what they saw permitted to the Gentiles because of their weakness, was
also allowable for themselves, thought that they would suffer no loss if they
followed the faith and confession of Christ keeping their property and possessions.
But those who still maintained the fervour of the apostles, mindful of that
former perfection left their cities and intercourse with those who thought
that carelessness and a laxer life was permissible to themselves and the Church
of God, and began to live in rural and more sequestered spots, and there, in
private and on their own account, to practise those things which they had learnt
to have been ordered by the apostles throughout the whole body of the Church
in general: and so that whole system of which we have spoken grew up from those
disciples who had separated themselves from the evil that was spreading. And
these, as by degrees time went on, were separated from the great mass of believers
and because they abstained from marriage and cut themselves off from intercourse
with their kinsmen and the life of this world, were termed monks or solitaries
from the strictness of their lonely and solitary life. Whence it followed that
from their common life they were called coenobites and their cells and lodgings
coenobia. That then alone was the earliest kind of monks, which is first not
only in time but also in grace, and which continued unbroken for a very long
period up to the time of Abbot Paul and Antony; and even to this day we see
its traces remaining in strict coenobia.
CHAPTER VI.
Of the system of the Anchorites and its beginning.
OUT of
this number of the perfect, and, if I may use the expression, this most fruitful
root of
saints, were
produced afterwards the flowers and fruits
of the anchorites as well. And of this order we have heard that the originators
were those whom we mentioned just now; viz., Saint Paul (2) and Antony, men
who frequented the recesses of the desert, not as some from faintheartedness,
and the evil of impatience, but from a desire for loftier heights of perfection
and divine contemplation, although the former of them is said to have found
his way to the desert by reason of necessity, while during the time of persecution
he was avoiding the plots of his neighbours. So then there sprang from that
system of which we have spoken another sort of perfection, whose followers
are rightly termed anchorites; i.e., withdrawers, because, being by no means
satisfied with that victory whereby they had trodden under foot the hidden
snares of the devil, while still living among men, they were eager to fight
with the devils in open conflict, and a straightforward battle, and so feared
not to penetrate the vast recesses of the desert, imitating, to wit, John the
Baptist, who passed all his life in the desert, and Elijah and Elisha and those
of whom the Apostle speaks as follows: "They wandered about in sheepskins
and goatskins, being in want, distressed, afflicted, of whom the world was
not worthy, wandering in deserts, in mountains and in dens and in caves of
the earth." Of whom too the Lord speaks figuratively to Job: "But
who hath sent out the wild ass free, and who hath loosed his bands? To whom
I have given the wilderness for an house, and a barren land for his dwelling.
He scorneth the multitude of the city and heareth not the cry of the driver;
he looketh round about the mountains of his pasture, and seeketh for every
green thing." In the Psalms also: "Let now the redeemed of the Lord
say, those whom He hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;" and after
a little: "They wandered in a wilderness in a place without water: they
found not the way of a city of habitation. They were hungry and thirsty: their
soul fainted in them. And they cried unto the Lord in their trouble and He
delivered them out of their distress;" whom Jeremiah too describes as
follows: "Blessed is the man that hath borne the yoke from his youth.
He shall sit solitary and hold his peace because he hath taken it up upon himself," and
there sing in heart and deed these words of the Psalmist:
"I am become like a pelican in the wilderness. I watched and am become
like a sparrow alone upon the house-top." (1)
CHAPTER VII.
Of the origin of the Sarabaites and their mode of life.
And while
the Christian religion was rejoicing in these two orders of monks though
this system had
begun by
degrees to deteriorate, there arose afterwards
that disgusting and unfaithful kind of monks; or rather, that baleful plant
revived and sprang up again which when it first shot up in the persons of Ananias
and Sapphira in the early Church was cut off by the severity of the Apostle
Peter -- a kind which among monks has been for a long while considered detestable
and execrable, and which was adopted by no one any more, so long as there remained
stamped on the memory of the faithful the dread of that very severe sentence,
in which the blessed Apostle not merely refused to allow the aforesaid originators
of the novel crime to be cured by penitence or any amends, but actually destroyed
that most dangerous germ by their speedy death. When then that precedent, which
was punished with Apostolical severity in the case of Ananias and Sapphira
had by degrees faded from the minds of some, owing to long carelessness and
forgetfulness from lapse of time, there arose the race of Sarabaites, who owing
to the fact that they have broken away from the congregations of the coenobites
and each look after their own affairs, are rightly named in the Egyptian language
Sarabaites, (2) and these spring from the number of those, whom we have mentioned,
who wanted to imitate rather than truly to aim at Evangelical perfection, urged
thereto by rivalry or by the praises of those who preferred the complete poverty
of Christ to all manner of riches. These then while in their feeble mind they
make a pretence of the greatest goodness and are forced by necessity to join
this order, while they are anxious to be reckoned by the name of monks without
emulating their pursuits, in no sort of way practise discipline, or are subject
to the will of the Elders, or, taught by their traditions, learn to govern
their own wills or take up and properly learn any rule of sound discretion;
but making their renunciation only as a public profession, i.e., before the
face of men, either continue in their homes devoted to the same occupations
as before, though dignified by this title, or building cells for themselves
and calling them monasteries remain in them perfectly free and their own masters,
never submitting to the precepts of the gospel, which forbid them to be busied
with any anxiety for the day's food, or troubles about domestic matters: commands
which those alone fulfil with no unbelieving doubt, who have freed themselves
from all the goods of this world and subjected themselves to the superiors
of the coenobia so that they cannot admit that they are at all their own masters.
But those who, as we said, shirk the severity of the monastery, and live two
or three together in their cells, not satisfied to be under the charge and
rule of an Abbot, but arranging chiefly for this; viz., that they may get rid
of the yoke of the Elders and have liberty to carry out their wishes and go
and wander where they will, and do what they like, these men are more taken
up both day and night in daily business than those who live in the coenobia,
but not with the same faith and purpose. For these Sarabaites do it not to
submit the fruits of their labours to the will of the steward, but to procure
money to lay by. And see what a difference there is between them. For the others
think nothing of the morrow, and offer to God the most acceptable fruits of
their toil: while these extend their faithless anxiety not only to the morrow,
but even to the space of many years, and so fancy that God is either false
or impotent as He either could not or would not grant them the promised supply
of food and clothing. The one seek this in all their prayers; viz., that they
may gain <greek>akthmosunhn</greek> i.e., the deprivation of all
things, and lasting poverty: the other that they may secure a rich quantity
of all sorts of supplies. The one eagerly strive to go beyond the fixed rule
of daily work that whatever is not wanted for the sacred purposes of the monastery,
may be distributed at the will of the Abbot either among the prisons, or in
the guest-chamber or in the infirmary or to the poor; the others that whatever
the day's gorge leaves over, may be useful for extravagant wants or else laid
by through the sin of covetousness. Lastly, if we grant that what has been
collected by them with no good design, may be disposed of in better ways than
we have mentioned, yet not even thus do they rise to the merits of goodness
and perfection. For the others bring in such returns to the monastery, and
daily report to them, and continue in such humility and subjection that they
are deprived of their rights over what they gain by their own efforts, just
as they are of their rights over themselves, as they constantly renew the fervour
of their original act of renunciation, while they daily deprive themselves
of the fruits of their labours: but these are puffed up by the fact that they
are bestowing something on the poor, and daily fall headlong into sin. The
one party are by patience and the strictness whereby they continue devoutly
in the order which they have once embraced, so as never to fulfil their own
will, crucified daily to this world and made living martyrs; the others are
cast down into hell by the lukewarmness of their purpose. These two sorts of
monks then vie with each other in almost equal numbers in this province; but
in other provinces, which the need of the Catholic faith compelled me to visit,
we have found that this third class of Sarabaites flourishes and is almost
the only one, since in the time of Lucius who was a Bishop of Arian mis-belief(1)
in the reign of Valens, while we carried alms(2) to our brethren; viz., those
from Egypt and the Thebaid, who had been consigned to the mines of Pontus and
Armenia(3) for their steadfastness in the Catholic faith, though we found the
system of coenobia in some cities few and far between, yet we never made out
that even the name of anchorites was heard among them.
CHAPTER VIII.
Of a fourth sort of monks.
THERE is however another and a fourth kind, which we have lately seen springing
up among those who flatter themselves with the appearance and form of anchorites,
and who in their early days seem in a brief fervour to seek the perfection
of the coenobium, but presently cool off, and, as they dislike to put an end
to their former habits and faults, and are not satisfied to bear the yoke of
humility and patience any longer, and scorn to be in subjection to the rule
of the Elders, look out for separate cells and want to remain by themselves
alone, that as they are provoked by nobody they may be regarded by men as patient,
gentle, and humble: and, this arrangement, or rather this lukewarmness never
suffers those, of whom it has once got hold, to approach to perfection. For
in this way their faults are not merely not rooted up, but actually grow worse,
while they are excited by no one, like some deadly and internal poison which
the more it is concealed, so much the more deeply does it creep in and cause
an incurable disease to the sick person. For out of respect for each man's
own cell no one ventures to reprove the faults of a solitary, which he would
rather have ignored than cured. Moreover virtues are created not by hiding
faults but by driving them out.
CHAPTER IX.
A question as to what is the difference between a coenobium and a monastery.
GERMANUS: Is there any distinction between a coenobium and a monastery, or
is the same thing meant by either name?
CHAPTER X.
The answer.
PIAMUN: Although many people indifferently speak of monasteries instead of
coenobia, yet there is this difference, that monastery is the title of the
dwelling, and means nothing more than the place, i.e., the habitation of monks,
while coenobium describes the character of the life and its system: and monastery
may mean the dwelling of a single monk, while a coenobium cannot be spoken
of except where dwells a united community of a large number of men living together.
They are however termed monasteries in which groups of Sarabaites live.
CHAPTER XI.
Of true humility, and how Abbot Serapion exposed the monk humility of a certain
man.
WHEREFORE
as I see that you have learnt the first principles of this life from the
best sort of monks,
i.e.,
that starting from the excellent school
of the coenobium you are aiming at the lofty heights of the anchorite's rule,
you should with genuine feeling of heart pursue the virtue of humility and
patience, which I doubt not that you learnt there; and not feign it, as some
do, by mock humility in words, or by an artificial and unnecessary readiness
for some duties of the body. And this sham humility Abbot Serapion(1) once
laughed to scorn most capitally. For when one had come to him making a great
display of his lowliness by his dress and words, and the old man urged him,
after his custom, to "collect the prayer"(2) he would not consent
to his request, but debasing himself declared that he was involved in such
crimes that he did not deserve even to breathe the air which is common to all,
and refusing even the use of the mat preferred to sit down on the bare ground.
But when he had shown still less inclination for the washing of the feet, then
Abbot Serapion, when supper was finished, and the customary Conference gave
him an opportunity, began kindly and gently to urge him not to roam with shifty
lightmindedness over the whole world, idly and vaguely, especially as he was
young and strong, but to keep to his cell in accordance with the rule of the
Elders and to elect to be supported by his own efforts rather than by the bounty
of others; which even the Apostle Paul would not allow, and though when he
was labouring in the cause of the gospel this provision might lightly have
been made for him, yet he preferred to work night and day, to provide daily
food for himself and for those who were ministering to him and could not do
the work with their own hands. Whereupon the other was filled with such vexation
and disgust that he could not hide by his looks the annoyance which he felt
in his heart. To whom the Elder: Thus far, my son, you have loaded yourself
with the weight of all kinds of crimes, not fearing lest by the confession
of such awful sins you bring a reproach upon your reputation; how is it then,
I pray, that now, at our simple admonition, which involved no reproof, but
simply showed a feeling for your edification and love, I see that you are moved
with such disgust that you cannot hide it by your looks, or conceal it by an
appearance of calmness? Perhaps while you were humiliating yourself, you were
hoping to hear from our lips this saying: "The righteous man is the accuser
of himself in the opening of his discourse?"(3) Further, true humility
of heart must be preserved, which comes not from an affected humbling of body
and in word, but from an inward humbling of the soul: and this will only then
shine forth with clear evidences of patience when a man does not boast about
sins, which nobody will believe, but, when another insolently accuses him of
them, thinks nothing of it, and when with gentle equanimity of spirit he puts
up with wrongs offered to him.
CHAPTER XII.
A question how true patience can be gained.
GERMANUS: We should like to know how that calmness can be secured and maintained,
that, as when silence is enjoined on us we shut the door of our mouth, and
lay an embargo on speech, so also we may be able to preserve gentleness of
heart, which sometimes even when the tongue is restrained loses its state of
calmness within: and for this reason we think that the blessing of gentleness
can only be preserved by one in a remote cell and solitary dwelling.
CHAPTER XIII.
The answer.
PIAMUN:
True patience and tranquillity is neither gained nor retained without profound
humility
of heart: and if
it has sprung from this source, there will
be no need either of the good offices of the cell or of the refuge of the desert.
For it will seek no external support from anything, if it has the internal
support of the virtue of humility, its mother and its guardian. But if we are
disturbed when attacked by anyone it is clear that the foundations of humility
have not been securely laid in us, and therefore at the outbreak even of a
small storm, our whole edifice is shaken and ruinously disturbed. For patience
would not be worthy of praise and admiration if it only preserved its purposed
tranquillity when attacked by no darts of enemies, but it is grand and glorious
because when the storms of temptation beat upon it, it remains unmoved. For
wherein it is believed that a man is annoyed and hurt by adversity, therein
is he strengthened the more; and he is therein the more exercised, wherein
he is thought to be annoyed. For everybody knows that patience gets its name
from the passions and endurance, and so it is clear that no one can be called
patient but one who bears without annoyance all the indignities offered to
him, and so it is not without reason that he is praised by Solomon: "Better
is the patient man than the strong, and he who restrains his anger than he
who takes a city;" and again: "For a long-suffering man is mighty
in prudence, but a faint-hearted man is very foolish."(1) When then anyone
is overcome by a wrong, and blazes up in a fire of anger, we should not hold
that the bitterness of the insult offered to him is the cause of his sin, but
rather the manifestation of secret weakness, in accordance with the parable
of our Lord and Saviour which He spoke about the two houses,(2) one of which
was founded upon a rock, and the other upon the sand, on both of which He says
that the tempest of rain and waters and storm beat equally: but that one which
was founded on the solid rock felt no harm at all from the violence of the
shock, while that which was built on the shifting and moving sand at once collapsed.
And it certainly appears that it fell, not because it was struck by the rush
of the storms and torrents. but because it was imprudently built upon the sand.
For a saint does not differ from a sinner in this, that he is not himself tempted
in the same way, but because he is not worsted even by a great assault, while
the other is overcome even by a slight temptation. For the fortitude of any
good man would not, as we said, be worthy of praise, if his victory was gained
without his being tempted, as most certainly there is no room for victory where
there is no struggle and conflict: for "Blessed is the man that endureth
temptation, for when he has been proved he shall receive the crown of life
which God hath promised to them that love Him."(3) According to the Apostle
Paul also "Strength is made perfect" not in ease and delights but "in
weakness." "For behold," says He, "I have made thee this
day a fortified city, and a pillar of iron, and a wall of brass, over all the
land, to the kings of Judah, and to the princes thereof, and to the priests
thereof, and to all the people of the land. And they shall fight against thee,
and shall not prevail: for I am with thee, saith the Lord, to deliver thee."(4)
CHAPTER XIV.
Of the example of patience given by a certain religious woman.
OF this
patience then I want to give you at least two examples: one of a certain
religious woman,
who aimed
at the virtue of patience so eagerly that she not
only did not avoid the assaults of temptation, but actually made for herself
occasions of trouble that she might not cease to be tried more often. For this
woman as she was living at Alexandria and was born of no mean ancestors, and
was serving the Lord religiously in the house which had been left to her by
her parents, came to Athanasius the Bishop, of blessed memory, and entreated
him to give her some other widow to support, who was being provided for at
the expense of the Church. And, to give her petition in her own words: "Give
me," she said, "one of the sisters to look after." When then
the Bishop had commended the woman's purpose because he saw that she was very
ready for a work of a mercy, he ordered a widow to be chosen out of the whole
number, who was preferred to all the rest for the goodness of her character,
and her grave and well-regulated life, for fear lest her wish to be liberal
might be overcome by the fault of the recipient of her bounty, and she who
sought gain out of the poor might be disgusted at her bad character and so
suffer an injury to her faith. And when the woman was brought home, she ministered
to her with all kinds of service, and found out her excellent modesty and gentleness,
and saw that every minute she was honoured by thanks from her for her kind
offices, and so after a few days she came back to the aforesaid Bishop, and
said: I asked you to bid that a woman be given to me for me to support and
to serve with obedient complaisance. And when he, not yet understanding the
woman's object and desire, thought that her petition had been neglected by
the deceitfulness of the superior, and inquired not without some anger in his
mind, what was the reason of the delay, at once he discovered that a widow
who was better than all the rest had been assigned to her, and so he secretly
gave orders that the one who was the worst of all should be given to her, the
one, I mean, who surpassed in anger and quarrelling and wine-bibbing and talkativeness
all who were under the power of these faults. And when she was only too easily
found and given to her, she began to keep her at home, and to minister to her
with the same care as to the former widow, or even more attentively, and this
was all the thanks which she got from her for her services; viz., to be constantly
tried by unworthy wrongs and continually annoyed by her by reproaches and upbraiding,
as she complained of her, and chid her with spiteful and disparaging remarks,
because she had asked for her from the Bishop not for her refreshment but rather
for her torment and annoyance, and had taken her away from rest to labour instead
of from labour to rest. When then her continual reproaches broke out so far
that the wanton woman did not restrain herself from laying hands on her, the
other only redoubled her services in still humbler offices, and learnt to overcome
the vixen not by resisting her, but by subjecting herself still more humbly,
so that, when provoked by all kinds of indignities, she might smooth down the
madness of the shrew by gentleness and kindness. And when she had been thoroughly
strengthened by these exercises, and had attained the perfect virtue of the
patience she had longed for, she came to the aforesaid Bishop to thank him
for his decision and choice as well as for the blessing of her exercise, because
he had at last as she wished provided her with a most worthy mistress for her
patience, strengthened daily by whose constant annoyance as by some oil for
wrestling, she had arrived at complete patience of mind; and, at last, said
she, you have given me one to support, for the former one rather honoured and
refreshed me by her services. This may be sufficient to have told about the
female sex, that by this tale we may not only be edified, but even confounded,
as we cannot maintain our patience unless we are like wild beasts removed in
caves and cells.
CHAPTER XV.
Of the example of patience given by Abbot Paphnutius.
NOW let
us give the other instance of Abbot Paphnutius, who always remained so zealously
in the recesses
of
that renowned and far-famed desert of Scete,
in which he is now Presbyter, so that the rest of the anchorites gave him the
name of Bubalis,(1) because he always delighted in dwelling in the desert as
if with a sort of innate liking. And so as even in boyhood he was so good and
full of grace that even the renowned and great men of that time admired his
gravity and steadfast constancy, and although he was younger in age, yet put
him on a level with the Elders out of regard for his virtues, and thought fit
to admit him to their order, the same envy, which formerly excited the minds
of his brethren against the patriarch Joseph, inflamed one out of the number
of his brethren with a burning and consuming jealousy. And this man wanting
to mar his beauty by some blemish or spot, hit on this kind of devilry, so
as to seize an opportunity when Paphnutius had left his cell to go to Church
on Sunday: and secretly entering his cell he slyly hid his own book among the
boughs which he used to weave of palm branches, and, secure of his well-planned
trick, himself went off as if with a pure and clean conscience to Church. And
when the whole service was ended as usual, in the presence of all the brethren
he brought his complaint to S. Isidore(2) who was Presbyter of this desert
before this same Paphnutius, and declared that his book had been stolen from
his cell. And when his complaint had so disturbed the minds of all the brethren,
and more especially of the Presbyter, so that they knew not what first to suspect
or think, as all were overcome with the utmost astonishment at so new and unheard
of a crime, such as no one remembered ever to have been committed in that desert
before that time, and which has never happened since, he who had brought forward
the matter as the accuser urged that they should all be kept in Church and
certain selected men be sent to search the cells of the brethren one by one.
And when this had been entrusted to three of the Elders by the Presbyter, they
turned over the bed-chambers of them all, and at last found the book hidden
in the cell of Paphnutius among the boughs of the palms which they call <greek>seira</greek>,
just as the plotter had hidden it. And when the inquisitors at once brought
it back to the Church and produced it before all, Paphnutius, although he was
perfectly clear in the sincerity of his conscience, yet like one who acknowledged
the guilt of thieving, gave himself up entirely to make amends and humbly asked
for a plan of repentance, as he was so careful of his shame and modesty (and
feared) lest if he tried to remove the stain of the theft by words, he might
further be branded as a liar, as no one would believe anything but what had
been found out. And when he had immediately left the Church not cast down in
mind but rather trusting to the judgment of God, he continually shed tears
at his prayers, and fasted thrice as often as before, and prostrated himself
in the sight of men with all humility of mind. But when he had thus submitted
himself with all contrition of flesh and spirit for almost a fortnight, so
that he came early on the morning of Saturday and Sunday not to receive the
Holy Communion(3) but to prostrate himself on the threshold of the Church and
humbly ask for pardon, He, Who is the witness of all secret things and knows
them, suffered him to be no longer tried by Himself or defamed by others. For
what the author of the crime, the wicked thief of his own property, the cunning
defamer of another's credit, had done with no man there as a witness, that
He made known by means of the devil who was himself the instigator of the sin.
For possessed by a most fierce demon, he made known all the craft of his secret
plot, and the same man who had conceived the accusation and the cheat betrayed
it. But he was so long and grievously vexed by that unclean spirit that he
could not even be restored by the prayers of the saints living there, who by
means of divine gifts can command the devils, nor could the special grace of
the Presbyter Isidore himself east out from him his cruel tormentor, though
by the Lord's bounty such power was given him that no one who was possessed
was ever brought to his doors without being at once healed; for Christ was
reserving this glory for the young Paphnutius, that the man should be cleansed
only by the prayers of him against whom he had plotted, and that the jealous
enemy should receive pardon for his offence and an end of his present punishment,
only by proclaiming his name, from whose credit he had thought that he could
detract. He then in his early youth already gave these signs of his future
character, and even in his boyish years sketched the lines of that perfection
which was to grow up in mature age. If then we want to attain to his height
of virtue, we must lay the same foundation to begin with.
CHAPTER XVI.
On the perfection of patience.
A TWOFOLD
reason however led me to relate this fact, first that we may weigh this steadfastness
and
constancy
of the man, and as we are attacked by less
serious wiles of the enemy, may the better secure a greater feeling of calmness
and patience, secondly that we may with resolute decision hold that we cannot
be safe from the storms of temptation and assaults of the devil if we make
all the protection for our patience and all our confidence consist not in the
strength of our inner man but in the doors of our cell or the recesses of the
desert, and companionship of the saints, or the safeguard of anything else
outside us. For unless our mind is strengthened by the power of His protection
Who says in the gospel "the kingdom of God is within you,"(1) m vain
do we fancy that we can defeat the plots of our airy foe by the aid of men
who are living with us, or that we can avoid them by distance of place, or
exclude them by the protection of walls. For though none of these things was
wanting to Saint Paphnutius yet the tempter did not fail to find a way of access
against him to attack him; nor did the encircling walls, or the solitude of
the desert or the merits of all those saints in the congregation repulse that
most foul spirit. But because the holy servant of God had fixed the hope of
his heart not on those external things but on Him Who is the judge of all secrets,
he could not be moved even by the machinations of such an assault as that.
On the other hand did not the man whom envy had hurried into so grievous a
sin enjoy the benefit of solitude and the protection of a retired dwelling,
and intercourse with the blessed Abbot and Presbyter Isidore and other saints?
And yet because the storm raised by the devil found him upon the sand, it not
only drove in his house but actually overturned it. We need not then seek for
our peace in externals, nor fancy that another person's patience can be of
any use to the faults of our impatience. For just as "the kingdom of God
is within you," so "a man's foes are they of his own household."(2)
For no one is more my enemy than my own heart which is truly the one of my
household closest to me. And therefore if we are careful, we cannot possibly
be injured by intestine enemies. For where those of our own household are not
opposed to us, there also the kingdom of God is secured in peace of heart.
For if you diligently investigate the matter, I cannot be injured by any man
however spiteful, if I do not fight against myself with warlike heart. But
if I am injured, the fault is not owing to the other's attack, but to my own
impatience. For as strong and solid food is good for a man in good health,
so it is bad for a sick one. But it cannot hurt the man who takes it, unless
the weakness of its recipient gives it its power to hurt. If then any similar
temptation ever arises among brethren, we need never be shaken out of the even
tenor of our ways and give an opening to the blasphemous snarls of men living
in the world, nor wonder that some bad and detestable men have secretly found
their way into the number of the saints, because so long as we are trodden
down and trampled in the threshing floor of this world, the chaff which is
destined for eternal fire is quite sure to be mingled with the choicest of
the wheat. Finally if we bear in mind that Satan was chosen among the angels,
and Judas among the apostles, and Nicholas the author of a detestable heresy
among the deacons, it will be no wonder that the basest of men are found among
the ranks of the saints. For although some maintain that this Nicholas was
not the same man who was chosen for the work of the ministry by the Apostles,(1)
nevertheless they cannot deny that he was of the number of the disciples, all
of whom were clearly of such a character and so perfect as those few whom we
can now with difficulty discover in the coenobia. Let us then bring forward
not the fall of the above-mentioned brother, who fell in the desert with so
grievous a collapse, nor that horrible stain which he afterwards wiped out
by the copious tears of his penitence, but the example of the blessed Paphnutius;
and let us not be destroyed by the ruin of the former, whose ingrained sin
of envy was increased and made worse by his affected piety, but let us imitate
with all our might the humility of the latter, which in his case was no sudden
production of the quiet of the desert, but had been gained among men, and was
consummated and perfected by solitude. However you should know that the evil
of envy is harder to be cured than other faults, for I should almost say that
a man whom it has once tainted with the mischief of its poison is without a
remedy. For it is the plague of which it is figuratively said by the prophet: "Behold
I will send among you serpents, basilisks, against which there is no charm:
and they shall bite you."(2) Rightly then are the stings of envy compared
by the prophet to the deadly poison of basilisks, as by it the first author
of all poisons and their chief perished and died. For he slew himself before
him of whom he was envious, and destroyed himself before that he poured forth
the poison of death against man: for "by the envy of the devil death entered
into the world: they therefore who are on his side follow him."(3) For
just as he who was the first to be corrupted by the plague of that evil, admitted
no remedy of penitence, nor any healing plaster, so those also who have given
themselves up to be smitten by the same pricks, exclude all the aid of the
sacred charmer, because as they are tormented not by the faults but by the
prosperity of those of whom they are jealous, they are ashamed to display the
real truth and look out for some external unnecessary and trifling causes of
offence: and of these, because they are altogether false, vain is the hope
of cure, while the deadly poison which they will not produce is lurking in
their veins. Of which the wisest of men has fitly said: "If a serpent
bite without hissing, there is no supply for the charmer."(4) For those
are silent bites, to which alone the medicine of the wise is no succour. For
that evil is so far incurable that it is made worse by attentions, it is increased
by services, is irritated by presents, because as the same Solomon says: "envy
endures nothing."(5) For just in proportion as another has made progress
in humble submission or in the virtue of patience or in the merit of munificence,
so is a man excited by worse pricks of envy, because he desires nothing less
than the ruin or death of the man whom he envies. Lastly no submission on the
part of their harmless brother could soften the envy of the eleven patriarchs,
so that Scripture relates of them: "But his brothers envied him because
his father loved him, and they could not speak peaceably unto him"(6)
until their jealousy, which would not listen to any entreaties on the part
of their obedient and submissive brother, desired his death, and would scarcely
be satisfied with the sin of selling a brother. It is plain then that envy
is worse than all faults, and harder to get rid of, as it is inflamed by those
remedies by which the others are destroyed. For, for example, a man who is
grieved by a loss that has been caused to him, is healed by a liberal compensation:
one who is sore owing to a wrong done to him, is appeased by humble satisfaction
being made. What can you do with one who is the more offended by the very fact
that he sees you humbler and kinder, who is not aroused to anger by any greed
which can be appeased by a bribe; or by any injurious attack or love of vengeance,
which is overcome by obsequious services; but is only irritated by another's
success and happiness? But who is there who in order to satisfy one who envies
him, would wish to fall from his good fortune, or to lose his prosperity or
to be involved in some calamity? Wherefore we must constantly implore the divine
aid, to which nothing is impossible, in order that the serpent may not by a
single bite of this evil destroy whatever is flourishing in us, and animated
as it were by the life and quickening power of the Holy Ghost. For the other
poisons of serpents, i.e., carnal sins and faults, in which human frailty is
easily entangled and from which it is as easily purified, show some traces
of their wounds in the flesh, whereby although the earthly body is most dangerously
inflamed, yet if any charmer well skilled in divine incantations applies a
cure and antidote or the remedy of words of salvation, the poisonous evil does
not reach to the everlasting death of the soul. But the poison of envy as if
emitted by the basilisk, destroys the very life of religion and faith, even
before the wound is perceived in the body. For he does not raise himself up
against men, but, in his blasphemy, against God, who carps at nothing in his
brother except his felicity, and so blames no fault of man, but simply the
judgment of God. This then is that "root of bitterness springing up"(1)
which raises itself to heaven and tends to reproaching the very Author Who
bestows good things on man. Nor shall anyone be disturbed because God threatens
to send "serpents, basilisks,"(2) to bite those by whose crimes He
is offended. For although it is certain that God cannot be the author of envy,
yet it is fair and worthy of the divine judgment that, while good gifts are
bestowed on the humble and refused to the proud and reprobate, those who, as
the Apostle says, deserve to be given over "to a reprobate mind,"(5)
should be smitten and consumed by envy sent as it were by Him, according to
this passage: "They have provoked me to jealousy by them that are no gods:
and I will provoke them to jealousy by them that are no nation."(6)
By this discourse the blessed Piamun excited still more keenly our desire
in which we had begun to be promoted from the infant school of the coenobium
to the second standard of the anchorites' life. For it was under his instruction
that we made our first start in solitary living, the knowledge of which we
afterwards followed up more thoroughly in Scete.
Return to Volume 34 Index