Subscribe
to CF
Be
first to know
Read our AAA review
from Catholic Culture
Our Mission
To
bring Jesus Christ; the Way, the Truth and the Life; to all who will follow,
according to scripture and tradition, per the Magisterium
of the Roman Catholic Church.
While you visit!
Listen
to
Radio
For the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. |
JOHN CASSIAN
CASSIAN'S CONFERENCES
VIII. THE SECOND CONFERENCE OF ABBOT SERENUS
ON PRINCIPALITIES
CHAPTER I.
Of the hospitality of Abbot Serenus.
WHEN we
had finished the duties of the day, and the congregation had been dismissed
from Church we
returned
to the old man's cell, and enjoyed a most
sumptuous repast. For instead of the sauce which with a few drops of oil spread
over it was usually set on the table for his daily meal, he mixed a little
decoction and poured over it a somewhat more liberal allowance of oil than
usual; for each of them when he is going to partake of his daily repast, pours
those drops of oil on, not that he may receive any enjoyment from the taste
of it (for so limited is the supply that it is hardly enough I will not say
to line the passage of his throat and jaws, but even to pass down it) but that
using it, he may keep down the pride of his heart (which is certain to creep
in stealthily and surely if his abstinence is any stricter) and the incitements
to vainglory, for as his abstinence is practised with the greater secrecy,
and is carried on without anyone to see it, so much the more subtly does it
never cease to tempt the man who conceals it. Then he set before us table salt,
and three olives each: after which he produced a basket containing parched
vetches which they call trogalia,(2) from which we each took five grains, two
prunes and a fig apiece. For it is considered wrong for anyone to exceed that
amount in that desert. And when we had finished this repast and had begun to
ask him again for his promised solution of the question, "Let us hear," said
the old man, "your question, the consideration of which we postponed till
the present time."
CHAPTER II.
Statements on the different kinds of spiritual wickednesses.
THEN GERMANUS:
We want to know what is the origin of the great variety of hostile powers
opposed
to men,
and the difference between them, which the blessed
Apostle sums up as follows: "We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but
against principalities, against powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness,
against spiritual wickedness in heavenly places:"(1) and a again: "Neither
angels nor principalities nor powers nor any other creature, can separate us
from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."(2) Whence then
arises the enmity of all this malice jealous of us? Are we to believe that
those powers were created by the Lord for this; viz., to fight against men
in these grades and orders?
CHAPTER III.
The answer on the many kinds of food provided in holy Scripture.
SERENUS:
The authority of holy Scripture says on those points on which it would inform
us some things
so
plainly and clearly even to those who are utterly
void of understanding, that not only are they not veiled in the obscurity of
any hidden meaning, but do not even require the help of any explanation, but
carry their meaning and sense on the surface of the words and letters: but
some things are so concealed and involved in mysteries as to offer us an immense
field for skill and care in the discussion and explanation of them. And it
is clear that God has so ordered it for many reasons: first for fear lest the
holy mysteries, if they were covered by no veil of spiritual meaning, should
be exposed equally to the knowledge and understanding of everybody, i.e., the
profane as well as the faithful and thus there might be no difference in the
matter of goodness and prudence between the lazy and the earnest: next that
among those who are indeed of the household of faith, while immense differences
of intellectual power open out before them, there might be the opportunity
of reproving the slothfulness of the idle, and of proving the keenness and
diligence of the earnest. And so holy Scripture is fitly compared to a rich
and fertile field, which, while bearing and producing much which is good for
man's food without being cooked by fire, produces some things which are found
to be unsuitable for man's use or even harmful unless they have lost all the
roughness of their raw condition by being tempered and softened down by the
heat of fire. But some are naturally fit for use in both states, so that even
when uncooked they are not unpleasant from their raw condition, but still are
rendered more palatable by being cooked and heated by fire. Many more things
too are produced only fit for the food of irrational creatures, and cattle,
and wild animals and birds, but utterly useless as food for men, which while
still in their rough state without being in any way touched by fire, conduce
to the health and life of cattle. And we can clearly see that the same system
holds good in that most fruitful garden of the Scriptures of the Spirit, in
which some things shine forth clear and bright in their literal sense, in such
a way that while they have no need of any higher interpretation, they furnish
abundant food and nourishment in the simple sound of the words, to the hearers:
as in this passage: "Hear, O Israel, the Lord thy God is one Lord;" and: "Thou
shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and
with all thy strength."(3) But there are some which, unless they are weakened
down by an allegorical interpretation, and softened by the trial of the fire
of the spirit cannot become wholesome food for the inner man without injury
and loss to him; and damage rather than profit will accrue to him from receiving
them: as with this passage: "But let your loins be girded up and your
lights burning;" and: "whosoever has no sword, let him sell his coat
and buy himself a sword;" and: "whosoever taketh not up his cross
and followeth after Me is not worthy of Me;"(4) a passage which some most
earnest monks, having "indeed a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge"(5)
understood literally, and so made themselves wooden crosses, and carried them
about constantly on their shoulders, and so were the cause not of edification
but of ridicule on the part of all who saw them. But some are capable of being
taken suitable and properly in both ways, i.e., the historical and allegorical,
so that either explanation furnishes a healing draught to the soul; as this
passage: "If any one shall smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him
the other also;" and: "when they persecute you in one city, flee
to another;" and: "if thou wilt be perfect, go, sell all that thou
hast and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come
follow Me."(6) It produces indeed "grass for the cattle" also,
(and of this food all the fields of Scripture are full); viz., plain and simple
narratives of history, by which simple folk, and those who are incapable of
perfect and sound understanding (of whom it is said "Thou, Lord, wilt
save both man and beast")(7) may be made stronger and more vigorous for
their hard work and the labour of actual life, in accordance with the state
and measure of their capacity.
CHAPTER IV.
Of the double sense in which Holy Scripture may be taken.
WHEREFORE
on those passages which are brought forward with a clear explanation we also
can constantly
lay down
the meaning and boldly state our own opinions.
But those which the Holy Spirit, reserving for our meditation and exercise,
has inserted in holy Scripture with veiled meaning, wishing some of them to
be gathered from various proofs and conjectures, ought to be step by step and
carefully brought together, so that their assertions and proofs may be arranged
by the discretion of the man who is arguing or supporting them. For sometimes
when a difference of opinion is expressed on one and the same subject, either
view may be considered reasonable and be held without injury to the faith either
firmly, or doubtfully, i.e., in such a way that neither is full belief nor
absolute rejection accorded to it, and the second view need not interfere with
the former, if neither of them is found to be opposed to the faith: as in this
case: where Elias came in the person of John,(1) and is again to be the precursor
of the Lord's Advent: and in the matter of the "Abomination of desolation" which "stood
in the holy place," by means of that idol of Jupiter which, as we read,
was placed in the temple in Jerusalem, and which is again to stand in the Church
through the coming of Antichrist,(2) and all those things which follow in the
gospel, which we take as having been fulfilled before the captivity of Jerusalem
and still to be fulfilled at the end of this world. In which matters neither
view is opposed to the other, nor does the first interpretation interfere with
the second.
CHAPTER V.
Of the fact that the question suggested ought to be included among those things
to be held in a neutral or doubtful way.
AND therefore since the question raised by us, does not seem to have been
sufficiently or often ventilated among men, and is clear to most people, and
from this fact what we bring forward may perhaps appear to some to be doubtful,
we ought to regulate our own view (since it does not interfere with faith in
the Trinity) so that it may be included among those things which are to be
held doubtfully; although they rest not on mere opinions such as are usually
given to guesses and conjectures, but on clear Scripture proof.
CHAPTER VI
Of the fact that nothing is created evil by God.
GOD forbid
that we should admit that God has created anything which is substantially
evil, as Scripture
says "everything that God had made was very good."(3)
For if they were created by God such as they are now, or made for this purpose;
viz., to occupy these positions of malice, and ever to be ready for the deception
and ruin of men, we should in opposition to the view of the above quoted Scripture
slander God as the Creator and author of evil, as having Himself formed utterly
evil wills and natures, creating them for this very purpose; viz., that they
might ever persist m their wickedness and never pass over to the feeling of
a good will. The following reason then of this diversity is what we received
from the tradition of the fathers, being drawn from the fount of Holy Scripture.
CHAPTER VII.
Of the origin of principalities or powers.
NONE of
the faithful question the fact that before the formation of this visible
creation God made spiritual
and celestial powers, in order that owing to the
very fact that they knew that they had been formed out of nothing by the goodness
of the Creator for such glory and bliss, they might render to Him continual
thanks and ceaselessly continue to praise Him, For neither should we imagine
that God for the first time began to originate His creation and work with the
formation of this world, as if in those countless ages beforehand He had taken
no thought of Providence and the divine ordering of things, and as if we could
believe that having none towards whom to show the blessings of His goodness,
He had been solitary, and a stranger to all bountifulness; a thing which is
too poor and unsuitable to fancy of that boundless and eternal and incomprehensible
Majesty; as the Lord Himself says of these powers: "When the stars were
made together, all my angels praised Me with a loud voice."(4) Those then
who were present at the creation of the stars, are most clearly proved to have
been created before that "beginning" in which it is said that heaven
and earth were made, inasmuch as they are said with loud voices and admiration
to have praised the Creator because of all those visible creatures which, as
they saw, proceeded forth from nothing. Before then that beginning in time
which is spoken of by Moses, and which according to the historic and Jewish
interpretation denotes the age of this world (without prejudice to our interpretation,
according to which we explain that the "beginning," of all things
is Christ, in whom the Father created all things, as it is said "All things
were made by him, and without Him was not anything made,")(1) before,
I say, that beginning of Genesis in time there is no question that God had
already created all those powers and heavenly virtues; which the Apostle enumerates
in order and thus describes: "For in Christ were created all things both
in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether they be angels or archangels,
whether they be thrones or dominions, whether they be principalities or powers.
All things were made by Him and in Him."(2)
CHAPTER VIII.
Of the fall of the devil and the angels.
AND So
we are clearly shown that out of that number of them some of the leaders
fell, by the lamentations
of Ezekiel and Isaiah, in which we know that the
prince of Tyre or that Lucifer who rose in the morning is lamented with a doleful
plaint: and of him the Lord speaks as follows to Ezekiel: "Son of man,
take up a lamentation over the prince of Tyre, and say to him: Thus saith the
Lord God: Thou wast the seal of resemblance, full of wisdom, perfect in beauty.
Thou wast in the pleasures of the paradise of God: every precious stone was
thy covering: the sardius, the topaz and the jasper, the chrysolyte and the
onyx and the beryl, the sapphire and the carbuncle and the emerald: gold the
work of thy beauty, and thy pipes were prepared in the day that thou wast created.
Thou wast a cherub stretched out and protecting, and I set thee in the holy
mountain of God, thou hast walked in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou
wast perfect in thy ways from the day of thy creation, until iniquity was found
in thee. By the multitude of thy merchandise thy inner parts were filled with
iniquity and thou hast sinned; and I cast thee out from the mountain of God,
and destroyed thee, O covering cherub, out of the midst of the stones of fire.
And thy heart was lifted up with thy beauty: thou hast lost thy wisdom in thy
beauty, I have cast thee to the ground: I have set thee before the face of
kings, that they might behold thee. Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the
multitude of thy iniquities and by the iniquity of thy traffic."(3) Isaiah
also says of another: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who
didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the ground, that didst wound
the nations? and thou saidst in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will
exalt my throne above the stars of God, I will sit in the mountain of the covenant,
in the sides of the north. I will ascend above the heights of the clouds. I
will be like the Most High."(4) But Holy Scripture relates that these
fell not alone from that summit of their station in bliss, as it tells us that
the dragon dragged down together with himself the third part of the stars.(5)
One of the Apostles too says still more plainly: "But the angels who kept
not their first estate, but left their own dwelling, He hath reserved in everlasting
chains under darkness to the judgmentof the great day."(6) This too which
is said to us: "But ye shall die like men and fall like one of the princes,"(7)
what does it imply but that many princes have fallen? And by these testimonies
we can gather the reason for this diversity; viz., either that they still retain
those differences of rank (which adverse powers are said to possess, after
the manner of holy and heavenly virtues) from the station of their former rank
in which they were severally created, or else that, though themselves cast
down from heavenly places, yet, as a reward for that wickedness of theirs m
which they have graduated in evil, they claim in perversity these grades and
titles of rank among themselves, by way of copying those virtues which have
stood firm there.
CHAPTER IX.
An objection seating that the fall of the devil took its origin from the deception
of God.
GERMANUS: Up till now we used to believe that the reason and commencement
of the ruin and fall of the devil, in which he was cast out from his heavenly
estate, was more particularly envy, when in his spiteful subtlety he deceived
Adam and Eve.
CHAPTER X.
The answer about the beginning of the devil's fall.
SERENUS:
The passage in Genesis shows that that was not the beginning of his fall
and ruin, as before
their
deception it takes the view that he had already
been branded with the ignominy of the name of the serpent, where it says: "But
the serpent was wiser" or as the Hebrew copies express it, "more
subtle than all the beasts of the earth, which the Lord God had made."(1)
You see then that he had fallen away from his angelic holiness even before
he deceived the first man, so that he not only deserved to be stamped with
the ignominy of this title, but actually excelled all other beasts of the earth
in the subterfuges of wickedness. For Holy Scripture would not have designated
a good angel by such a term, nor would it say of those who were still continuing
in that state of bliss: "But the serpent was wiser than all the beasts
of the earth." For this title could not possibly be applied I say not
to Gabriel or Michael, but it would not even be suitable to any good man. And
so the title of serpent and the comparison to beasts most clearly suggests
not the dignity of an angel but the infamy of an apostate. Finally the occasion
of the envy and seduction, which led him to deceive man, arose from the ground
of his previous fall, in that he saw that man, who had but recently been formed
out of the dust of the ground, was to be called to that glory, from which he
remembered that he himself, while still one of the princes, had fallen. And
so that first fall of his, which was due to pride, and which obtained for him
the name of the serpent, was followed by a second owing to envy: and as this
one found him still in the possession of something upright so that he could
enjoy some interchange of conference and counsel with man, by the Lord's sentence
he was very properly cast down to the lowest depth, that he might no longer
walk as before erect, and looking up on high, but should cleave to the ground
and creep along, and be brought low upon his belly and feed upon the earthly
food and works of sins, and henceforward proclaim his secret hostility, and
put between himself and man an enmity that is to our advantage, and a discord
that is to our profit, so that while men are on their guard against him as
a dangerous enemy, he can no longer injure them by a deceptive show of friendship.
CHAPTER XI.
The punishment of the deceiver and the deceived.
BUT we
ought in this matter, in order that we may shun evil counsels, to learn a
special lesson from the
fact that though the author of the deception was
visited with a fitting punishment and condemnation, yet still the one who was
led astray did not go scot free from punishment, although it was somewhat lighter
than that of him who was the author of the deception. And this we see was very
plainly expressed. For Adam who was deceived, or rather (to use the Apostle's
words) "was not deceived" but, acquiescing in the wishes of her who
was deceived, seems to have come to yield a consent that was deadly, is only
condemned to labour and the sweat of his brow, which is assigned to him not
by means of a curse upon himself, but by means of a curse upon the ground,
and its barrenness. But the woman, who persuaded him to this, is visited with
an increase of anguish, and pains and sorrow, and also given over to the yoke
of perpetual subjection. But the serpent who was the first to incite them to
this offence, is punished by a lasting curse. Wherefore we should with the
utmost care and circumspection be on our guard against evil counsels, for as
they bring punishment upon their authors, so too they do not suffer those who
are deceived by them to go free from guilt and punishment.
CHAPTER XII.
Of the crowd of the devils, and the disturbance which they always raise in
our atmosphere.
BUT the atmosphere which extends between heaven and earth is ever filled with
a thick crowd of spirits, which do not fly about in it quietly or idly, so
that most fortunately the divine providence has withdrawn them from human sight.
For through fear of their attacks, or horror at the forms, into which they
transform and turn themselves at will, men would either be driven out of their
wits by an insufferable dread, and faint away, from inability to look on such
things with bodily eyes, or else would daily grow worse and worse, and be corrupted
by their constant example and by imitating them, and thus there would arise
a sort of dangerous familiarity and deadly intercourse between men and the
unclean powers of the air, whereas those crimes which are now committed among
men, are concealed either by walls and enclosures or by distance and space,
or by some shame and confusion: but if they could always look on them with
open face, they would be stimulated to a greater pitch of insanity, as there
would not be a single moment in which they would see them desist from their
wickedness, since no bodily weariness, or occupation in business or care for
their daily food (as in our case) forces them sometimes even against their
will to desist from the purposes they, have begun to carry out.
CHAPTER XIII.
Of the fact that opposing powers turn the attack, which they aim at men, even
against each other.
FOR it
is quite clear that they aim these attacks, with which they assault men,
even against each
other,
for in like manner they do not cease to promote
with unwearied strife the discords and struggles which they have undertaken
for some peoples because of a sort of innate love of wickedness which they
have: and this we read of as being very clearly set forth in the vision of
Daniel the prophet, where the angel Gabriel speaks as follows: "Fear not,
Daniel: for from the first day that thou didst set thy heart to understand,
to afflict thyself in the sight of thy God, thy words have been heard: and
I am come for thy words. But the prince of the kingdom of the Persians resisted
me one and twenty days: and behold Michael one of the chief princes came to
help me, and I remained there by the king of the Persians. But I am come to
teach thee what thinks shall befall thy people in the latter days."(1)
And we can not possibly doubt that this prince of the kingdom of the Persians
was a hostile power, which favoured the nation of the Persians an enemy of
God's people; for in order to hinder the good which it saw would result from
the solution of the question for which the prophet prayed the Lord, by the
archangel, in its jealousy it opposed itself to prevent the saving comfort
of the angel from reaching Daniel too speedily, and from strengthening the
people of God, over which the archangel Gabriel was: and the latter said that
even then, owing to the fierceness of his assaults, he would not have been
able to come to him, had not Michael the archangel come to help him, and met
the prince of the kingdom of the Persians, and joined battle with him, and
intervened, and defended him from his attack, and so enabled him to come to
instruct the prophet after twenty-one days. And a little later on it says: "And
the angel said: Dost thou know wherefore I am come to thee? And now I will
return to fight against the prince of the Persians. For when I went forth,
there appeared the prince of the Greeks coming. But I will tell thee what is
written down in the Scriptures of truth: and none is my helper in all these
things but Michael your prince."(2) And again: "At that time shall
Michael rise up, the great prince, who standeth for the children of thy people."(3)
So then we read that in the same way another was called the prince of the Greeks,
who since he was patron of that nation which was subject to him seems to have
been opposed to the nation of the Persians as well as to the people of Israel.
From which we clearly see that antagonistic powers raise against each other
those quarrels of nations, and conflicts and dissensions, which they show among
themselves at their instigation, and that they either exult at their victories
or are cast down at their defeats, and thus cannot live in harmony among themselves,
while each of them is always striving with restless jealousy on behalf of those
whom he presides over, against the patron of some other nation.
CHAPTER XIV.
How it is that spiritual wickednesses obtained the names of powers or principalities.
WE can
then see clear reasons, in addition to those ideas which we expounded above,
why they are
called
principalities or powers; viz., because they rule
and preside over different nations, and at least hold sway over inferior spirits
and demons, of which the gospels give us evidence by their own confession that
there exist legions. For they could not be called lords unless they had some
over whom to exercise the sway of lordship; nor could they be called powers
or principalities, unless there were some over whom they could claim power:
and this we find pointed out very clearly in the gospel by the Pharisees in
their blasphemy: "He casteth out devils by Beelzebub the prince of the
devils,"(4) for we find that they are also called "rulers of darkness,"(5)
and that one of them is styled "the prince of this world."(6) But
the blessed Apostle declares that hereafter, when all things shall be subdued
to Christ, these orders shall be destroyed, saying: "When He shall have
delivered up the kingdom to God even the Father, when He shall have destroyed
all principalities and powers and dominions."(7) And this certainly can
only take place if they are removed from the sway of those over whom we know
that powers and dominions and principalities take charge in this world.
CHAPTER XV.
Of the fact that it is not without reason that the names of angels and archangels
are given to holy and heavenly powers.
FOR no
one doubts that not without cause or reason are the same titles of rank assigned
to the better
sort,
and that they are names of office and of
worth or dignity, for it is plain that they are termed angels, i.e., messengers
from their office of bearing messages, and the appropriateness of the name
teaches that they are "archangels" because the preside over angels, "dominions" because
they hold dominion over certain persons, and "principalities" because
they have some to be princes over, and "thrones" because they are
so near to God and so privy and close to Him that the Divine Majesty specially
rests in them as in a Divine throne, and in a way reclines surely on them.
CHAPTER XVI.
Of the subjection of the devils, which they show to their own princes, as
seen in a brother's victim.
BUT that
unclean spirits are ruled over by worse powers and are subject to them we
not only find from
those
passages of Scripture, recorded in the gospels
when the Pharisees maligned the Lord, and He answered "If I by Beelzebub
the prince of the devils cast out devils,"(1) but we are also taught this
by clear visions and many experiences of the saints, for when one of our brethren
was making a journey in this desert, as day was now declining he found a cave
and stopped there meaning to say his evening office in it, and there midnight
passed while he was still singing the Psalms. And when after he had finished
his office he sat down a little before refreshing his wearied body, on a sudden
he began to see innumerable troops Of demons gathering together on all sides,
who came forward in an immense crowd, and a long line, some preceding and others
following their prince; who at length arrived, being taller and more dreadful
to look at than all the others; and, a throne having been placed, he sat down
as on some lofty tribunal, and began to investigate by a searching examination
the actions of each one of them; and those who said that they had not yet been
able to circumvent their rivals, he commanded to be driven out of his sight
with shame and ignominy as idle and slothful, rebuking them with angry wrath
for the waste of so much time, and for their labour thrown away: but those
who reported that they had deceived those assigned to them, he dismissed before
all with the highest praise amidst the exultation and applause of all, as most
brave warriors, and most renowned as an example to all the rest: and when in
this number some most evil spirit had presented himself, in delight at having
to relate some magnificent triumph, he mentioned the name of a very well known
monk, and declared that after having incessantly attacked him for fifteen years,
he had at last got the better of him, so as to destroy him that very same night
by the sin of fornication, for that he had not only impelled him to commit
adultery with some consecrated maid, but had actually persuaded him to keep
her and marry her. And when there arose shouts of joy at this narrative, he
was extolled with the highest praise by the` prince of darkness, and departed
crowned with great honours. And so when at break of day the whole swarm of
demons had vanished from his eyes, the brother being doubtful about the assertion
of the unclean spirit, and rather thinking that he had desired to entice him
by an ancient customary deceit, and to brand an innocent brother with the crime
of incest, being mindful of those words of the gospel; viz., that "he
abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a
lie, he speaketh of his own, for he is a liar, and its father,"(2) he
made his way to Pelusium, where he knew that the man lived, whom the evil spirit
declared to be destroyed: for the brother was very well known to him, and when
he had asked him, he found that on the same night on which that foul demon
had announced his downfall to his company and prince, he had left his former
monastery, and sought the town, and had gone astray by a wretched fall with
the girl mentioned.
CHAPTER XVII.
Of the fact that two angels always cling to every man.
FOR Holy
Scripture bears witness that two angels, a good and a bad one, cling to each
one of us. And
of the
good ones the Saviour says: "Do not despise
one of these little ones; for I say unto you that their angels in heaven do
always behold the face of thy Father which is in heaven:"(3) and this
also: "the angel of the Lord shall encamp round about them that fear Him,
and deliver them."(4) Moreover this also which is said in the Acts of
the Apostles, of Peter, that "it is his angel."(1) But of both sorts
the book of the Shepherd teaches us very fully.(2) But if we consider about
him who attacked the blessed Job we shall clearly learn that it was he who
always plotted against him but never could entice him to sin, and that therefore
he asked for power from the Lord, as he was worsted not by his (Job's) virtue
but by the Lord's protection which ever shielded him. Of Judas also it is said: "And
let the devil stand at his right hand."(3)
CHAPTER XVIII.
Of the degrees of wickedness which exist in hostile spirits, as shown in the
case of two philosophers.
BUT of the difference that there is between demons we have learnt a great
deal by means of those two philosophers who formerly by acts of magic had oftentimes
great experience both of their laziness and of their courage and savage wickedness.
For these looking down on the blessed Antony as a boor and rustic, and wanting,
if they could not injure him any further, at least to drive him from his cell
by illusions of magic and the devices of demons, despatched against him most
foul spirits. for they were impelled to this attack upon him by the sting of
jealousy because enormous crowds came daily to him as the servant of God. And
when these most savage demons did not even venture to approach him as he was
now signing his breast and forehead with the sign of the cross, and, now devoting
himself to prayer and supplication, they returned without any result to those
who had directed them; and these again sent against him others more desperate
in wickedness, and when these too had spent their strength in vain, and returned
without having accomplished anything, and others still more powerful were nevertheless
told off against the victorious soldier of Christ, and could prevail nothing
against him, all these great plots of theirs devised with all the arts of magic
were only useful in proving the great value that there is in the profession
of Christians, so that those fierce and powerful shadows, which they thought
would veil the sun and moon if they were directed towards them, could not only
not injure him, but not even draw him forth from his monastery for a single
instant.
CHAPTER XIX.
Of the fact that devils cannot prevail at all against men unless they have
first secured possession of their minds.
AND when
in their astonishment at this they came straight to Abbot Antony and disclosed
the extent of their
attacks and the reason of them and their
plots, they dissembled their jealousy and asked that they might forthwith be
made Christians. But when he had asked of them the day when the assault was
made, he declared that at that time he had been afflicted with the most bitter
pangs of thought. And by this experience the blessed Antony proved and established
the opinion which we expressed yesterday in our Conference, that demons cannot
possibly find an entrance into the mind or body of anyone, nor have they the
power of overwhelming the soul of anyone, unless they have first deprived it
of all holy thoughts, and made it empty and free from spiritual meditation.
But you must know that unclean spirits are obedient to men in two ways. For
either they are by divine grace and power subject to the holiness of the faithful,
or they are captivated by the sacrifices of sinners, and certain charms, and
are flattered by them as their worshippers. And the Pharisees too were led
astray by this notion and fancied that by this device even the Lord the Saviour
gave commands to devils, and said "By Beelzebub the prince of the devils
He casteth out devils," in accordance with that plan by which they knew
that their own magicians and enchanters--by invoking his name and offering
sacrifices, with which they know he is pleased and delighted--have as his servants
power even over the devils who are subject to him.
CHAPTER XX.
A question about the fallen angels who are said in Genesis to have had intercourse
with the daughters of men.
GERMANUS:
Since a passage of Genesis was a little while ago by the providence of God
brought forward
in our midst,
and happily reminded us that we can now
conveniently ask about a point which we have always longed to learn, we want
to know what view we ought to take about those fallen angels who are said to
have had intercourse with the daughters of men, and whether such a thing can
literally take place with a spiritual nature. And also with regard to this
passage of the gospel which you quoted of the devil a little while back, "for
he is a liar and his father,"(1) we should like in the same way to hear
who is to be understood by "his father."
CHAPTER XXI.
The answer to the question raised.
SERENUS:
You have propounded two not unimportant questions, to which I will reply,
to the best of my ability,
in the order in which you have raised them.
We cannot possibly believe that spiritual existences can have carnal intercourse
with women. But if this could ever have literally happened how is it that it
does not now also sometimes take place, and that we do not see some in the
same way born of women by the agency of demons without intercourse with men?
especially when it is clear that they delight in the pollution of lust, which
they would certainly prefer to bring about through their own agency rather
than through that of men, if they could possibly manage it, as Ecclesiastes
declares: "What is it that hath been? The same that is. And what is it
that hath been done? The same that is done. And there is nothing new that can
be said under the sun, so that a man can say: Behold this is new; for it hath
already been in the ages which were before us."(2) But the question raised
may be resolved in this way. After the death of righteous Abel, in order that
the whole human race might not spring from a wicked fratricide, Seth was born
in the place of his brother who was slain, to take the place of his brother
not only as regards posterity, but also as regards justice and goodness. And
his offspring, following the example of their father's goodness, always remained
separate from intercourse with and the society of their kindred descended from
the wicked Cain, as the difference of the genealogy very clearly tells us,
where it says: "Adam begat Seth, Seth begat Enos, Enos begat Cainan, but
Cainan begat Mahalaleel, but Mahalaleel begat Jared, Jared begat Enoch, Enoch
begat Methuselah, Methuselah begat Lamech, Lamech begat Noah."(3) And
the genealogy of Cain is given separately as follows: "Cain begat Enoch,
Enoch begat Cainan, Cainan begat Mahalaleel, Mahalaleel begat Methuselah, Methuselah
begat Lamech, Lamech begat Jabal and Jubal."(4) And so the line which
sprang from the seed of righteous Seth always mixed with its own kith and kin,
and continued for a long while in the holiness of its fathers and ancestors,
untouched by the blasphemies and the wickedness of an evil offspring, which
had implanted in it a seed of sin as it were transmitted by its ancestors.
As long then as there continued that separation of the lines between them,
the seed of Seth, as it sprang from an excellent root, was by reason of its
sanctity termed "angels of God," or as some copies have it "sons
of God;"(5) and on the contrary the others by reason of their own and
their fathers' wickedness and their earthly deeds were termed "children
of men." Though then there was up to this time that holy and salutary
separation between them, yet after this the sons of Seth who were the sons
of God saw the daughters of those who were born of the line of Cain, and inflamed
with the desire for their beauty took to themselves from them wives who taught
their husbands the wickedness of their fathers, and at once led them astray
from their innate holiness and the single-mindedness of their forefathers.
To whom this saying applies with sufficient accuracy: "I have said: Ye
are Gods, and ye are all the children of the Most High. But ye shall die like
men, and fall like one of the princes;"(6) who fell away from that true
study of natural philosophy, handed down to them by their ancestors, which
the first man who forthwith traced out the study of all nature, could clearly
attain to, and transmit to his descendants on sure grounds, inasmuch as he
had seen the infancy of this world, while still as it were tender and throbbing
and unorganized; and as there was in him not only such fulness of wisdom, but
also the grace of prophecy given by the Divine inspiration, so that while he
was still an untaught inhabitant of this world he gave names to all living
creatures, and not only knew about the fury and poison of all kinds of beasts
and serpents, but also distinguished between the virtues of plants and trees
and the natures of stones, and the changes of seasons of which he had as vet
no experience, so that he could well say: "The Lord hath given me the
true knowledge of the things that are, to know the disposition of the whole
world, and the virtues of the elements, the beginning and the ending and the
midst of times, the alterations of their courses and the changes of their seasons,
the revolutions of the year and the disposition of the stars, the natures of
living creatures and the rage of wild beasts, the force of winds, and the reasonings
of men, the diversities of plants and the virtues of roots, and all such things
as are hid and open I have learnt."(1) This knowledge then of all nature
the seed of Seth received through successive generations, handed down from
the fathers, so long as it remained separate from the wicked line, and as it
had received it in holiness, so it made use of it to promote the glory of God
and the needs of everyday life. But when it had been mingled with the evil
generation, it drew aside at the suggestion of devils to profane and harmful
uses what it had innocently learnt, and audaciously taught by it the curious
arts of wizards and enchantments and magical superstitions, teaching its posterity
to forsake the holy worship of the Divinity and to honour and worship either
the elements or fire or the demons of the air. How it was then that this knowledge
of curious arts of which we have spoken, did not perish in the deluge, but
became known to the ages that followed, should, I think, be briefly explained,
as the occasion of this discussion suggests, although the answer to the question
raised scarcely requires it. And so, as ancient traditions tell us, Ham the
son of Noah, who had been taught these superstitions and wicked and profane
arts, as he knew that he could not possibly bring any handbook on these subjects
into the ark, into which he was to enter with his good father and holy brothers,
inscribed these nefarious arts and profane devices on plates of various metals
which could not be destroyed by the flood of waters, and on hard rocks, and
when the flood was over he hunted for them with the same inquisitiveness with
which he had concealed them, and so transmitted to his descendants a seed-bed
of profanity and perpetual sin. In this way then that common notion, according
to which men believe that angels delivered to men enchantments and diverse
arts, is in truth fulfilled. From these sons of Seth then and daughters of
Cain, as we have said, there were I born still worse children who became mighty,
hunters, violent and most fierce men who were termed giants by reason of the
size of their bodies and their cruelty and wickedness. For these first began
to harass their neighbours and to practise pillaging among men, getting their
living rather by rapine than by being contented with the sweat and labour of
toil, and their wickedness increased to such a pitch that the world could only
be purified by the flood and deluge. So then when the sons of Seth at the instigation
of their lust had transgressed that command which had been for a long while
kept by a natural instinct from the beginning of the world, it was needful
that it should afterwards be restored by the letter of the law: "Thou
shalt not give thy daughter to his son to wife, nor shalt thou take a wife
of his daughters to thy son; for they shall seduce your hearts to depart from
your God, and to follow their gods and serve them."(2)
CHAPTER XXII.
An objection, as to how an unlawful intermingling with the daughters of Cain
could be charged against the line of Seth before the prohibition of the law.
GERMANUS: If that command had been given to them, then the sin of breaking
it might fairly have been brought against them for their audacity in so marrying.
But since the observance of that separation had not yet been established by
any rule, how could that intermingling of races be counted wrong in them, as
it had not been forbidden by any command? For a law does not ordinarily forbid
crimes that are past, but those that are future.
CHAPTER XXIII.
The answer, that by the law of nature men were from the beginning liable to
judgment and punishment.
SERENUS:
God at man's creation implanted in him naturally complete knowledge of the
law, and if
this had
been kept by man, as at the beginning, according
to the Lord's purposes, there would not have been any need for another law
to be given, which He afterwards proclaimed in writing: for it were superfluous
for an external remedy to be offered, where an internal one was still implanted
and vigorous. But since this had been, as we have said, utterly corrupted by
freedom and the opportunity of sinning, the severe restrictions of the law
of Moses were added as the executor and vindicator of this (earlier law) and
to use the expressions of Scripture, as its helper, that through fear of immediate
punishment men might be kept from altogether losing the good of natural knowledge,
according to the word of the prophet who says "He gave the law to help
them:"(1) and it is also described by the Apostle as having been given
as a schoolmaster(2) to little children, as it instructs and guards them to
prevent them from departing through sheer forgetfulness from the teaching in
which they had been instructed by the light of nature: for that the complete
knowledge of the law was implanted in man at his first creation, is clearly
proved from this; viz., that we know that before the law, aye, and even before
the flood, all holy men observed the commands of the law without having the
letter to read. For how could Abel, without the command of the law, have known
that he ought to offer to God a sacrifice of the firstlings of his flock and
of the fat thereof,(3) unless he had been taught by the law which was naturally
implanted in him? How could Noah have distinguished what animals were clean
and what were unclean,(4) when the commandment of the law had not yet made
a distinction, unless he had been taught by a natural knowledge? Whence did
Enoch learn how to "walk with God,"(5) having never acquired any
light of the law from another? Where had Shem and Japheth read "Thou shalt
not uncover the nakedness of thy father," so that they went backwards
and covered the shame of their father?(6) How was Abraham taught to abstain
from the spoils of the enemy which were offered to him, that he might not receive
any recompense for his toil, or to pay to the priest Melchizedec the tithes
which are ordered by the law of Moses?(7) How was it too that the same Abraham
and Lot also humbly offered to passers by and strangers offices of kindness
and the washing of their feet, while yet the Evangelic command had not shone
forth?(8) Whence did Job obtain such earnestness of faith, such purity of chastity,
such knowledge of humility, gentleness, pity and kindness, as we now see shown
not even by those who know the gospels by heart? Which of the saints do we
read of as not having observed some commandment of the law before the giving
of the law? Which of them failed to keep this: "Hear, O Israel, the Lord
thy God is one Lord?"(9) Which of them did not fulfil this: "Thou
shalt not make to thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of anything which
is in heaven or in the earth or under the earth?" Which of them did not
observe this: "Honour thy father and thy mother," or what follows
in the Decalogue: "Thou shalt do no murder; Thou shalt not commit adultery;
Thou shalt not steal; Thou shalt not bear false witness; Thou shalt not covet
thy neighbour's wife,"(10) and many other things besides, in which they
anticipated the commands not only of the law but even of the gospel?
CHAPTER XXIV.
Of the fact that they were justly punished, who sinned before the flood.
And so
then we see that from the beginning God created everything perfect, nor would
there have been
need
for anything to have been added to His original
arrangement--as if it were shortsighted and imperfect--if everything had continued
in that state and condition in which it had been created by Him. And therefore
in the case of those who sinned before the law and even before the flood we
see that God visited them with a righteous judgment, because they deserved
to be punished without any excuse, for having transgressed the law of nature;
nor should we fall into the blasphemous slanders of those who are ignorant
of this reason, and so depreciate the God of the Old Testament, and run down
our faith, and say with a sneer: Why then did it please your God to will to
promulgate the law after so many thousand years, While He suffered such long
ages to pass without any law? But if He afterwards discovered something better,
then it appears that at the beginning of the world His wisdom was inferior
and poorer, and that afterwards as if taught by experience He began to provide
for something better, and to amend and improve His original arrangements. A
thing which certainly cannot happen to the infinite foreknowledge of God, nor
can these assertions be made about Him by the mad folly of heretics without
grievous blasphemy, as Ecclesiastes says: "I have learnt that all the
words which God hath made from the beginning shall continue forever: nothing
can be added to them, and nothing can be taken away from them,"(11) and
therefore "the law is not made for the righteous, but for the unrighteous,
and insubordinate, for the ungodly and sinners, for the wicked and profane."(12)
For as they had the sound and complete system of natural laws implanted in
them they had no need of this external law in addition, and one committed to
writing, and what was given as an aid to that natural law. From which we infer
by the clearest of reasonings that that law committed to writing need not have
been given at the beginning (for it was unnecessary for this to be done while
the natural law still remained, and was not utterly violated) nor could evangelical
perfection have been granted before the law had been kept. For they could not
have listened to this saying: "If a man strikes thee on the right cheek,
turn to him the other also,"(1) who were not content to avenge wrongs
done to them with the even justice of the lex talionis, but repaid a very slight
touch with deadly kicks and wounds with weapons, and for a single truth sought
to take the life of those who had struck them. Nor could it be said to them, "love
your enemies,"(2) among whom it was considered a great thing and most
important if they loved their friends, but avoided their enemies and dissented
from them only in hatred without being eager to oppress and kill them.
CHAPTER XXV.
How this
that is said of the devil in the gospel is to be understood; viz., that "he
is a liar, and his father."
But as
for this which disturbed you about the devil, that "he is a liar
and his father,"(3) as if it seemed that he and his father were pronounced
by the Lord to be liars, it is sufficiently ridiculous to imagine this even
cursorily. For as we said a little while ago spirit does not beget spirit just
as soul cannot procreate soul, though we do not doubt that the compacting of
flesh is formed from man's seed, as the Apostle clearly distinguishes in the
case of both substances; viz., flesh and spirit, what should be ascribed to
whom as its author, and says: "Moreover we have had fathers of our flesh
for instructors, and we reverenced them: shall we not much more be in subjection
to the Father of spirits and live? "(4) What could show more clearly than
this distinction, that he laid down that men were the fathers of our flesh,
but always taught that God alone was the Father of souls. Although even in
the actual compacting of this body a ministerial office alone must be attributed
to men, but the chief part of its formation to God the Creator of all, as David
says: "Thy hands have made me and fashioned me:"(5) And the blessed
Job: "Hast thou not milked me as milk, and curdled me as cheese? Thou
hast put me together with bones and sinews;"(6) and the Lord to Jeremiah: "Before
I formed thee in the womb, I knew thee."(7) But Ecclesiastes very clearly
and accurately gathers the nature of either substance, and its beginning, by
an examination of the rise and commencement, from which each originated, and
by a consideration of the end to which each is tending, and decides also of
the division of this body and soul, and discourses as follows: "Before
the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns unto God who
gave it."(8) But what could be said with greater plainness than that he
declares that the matter of the flesh which he styled dust, because it springs
from the seed of man, and seems to be sown by his ministration, mush as it
was taken from the earth, again return to the earth, while he points out that
the spirit which is not begotten by intercourse between the sexes, but belongs
to God alone in a special way, returns to its creator? And this also is clearly
implied in that breathing by God, through which Adam in the first instance
received his life. And so from these passages we clearly infer that no one
can be called the Father of spirits but God alone, who makes them out of nothing
whenever He pleases, while men can only be termed the fathers of our flesh.
So then the devil also in as much as he was created a spirit or an angel and
good, had no one as his Father but God his Maker. But when he had become puffed
up by pride and had said in his heart: "I will ascend above the heights
of the clouds, I will be like the Most High,"(9) he became a liar, and "abode
not in the truth;"(10) but brought forth a lie from his own storehouse
of wickedness and so became not only a liar, but also the father of the actual
lie, by which when he promised Divinity to man and said "Ye shall be as
gods,"(11) he abode not in the truth, but from the beginning became a
murderer, both by bringing Adam into a state of mortality, and by slaying Abel
by the hand of his brother at his suggestion. But already the approach of dawn
is bringing to a close our discussion, which has occupied nearly two whole
nights, and our brief and simple words have drawn our bark of this Conference
from the deep sea of questions to a safe harbour of silence, in which deep
indeed, as the breath of the Divine Spirit drives us further in, so is there
ever opened out a wider and boundless space reaching beyond the sight of our
eye, and, as Solomon says, "It will become much further from us than it
was, and a great depth; who shall find it out?"(12) Wherefore let us pray
the Lord that both His fear and His love, which cannot fail, may continue steadfast
in us, and make us wise in all things, and ever shield us unharmed, from the
darts of the devil. For with these guards it is impossible for anyone to fall
into the snares of death. But there is this difference between the perfect
and imperfect, that in the case of the former love is steadfast, and so to
speak riper and lasts more abidingly and so makes them persevere in holiness
more steadfastly and more easily, while in the case of the latter its position
is weaker and it more easily grows cold, and so quickly and more frequently
allows them to be entangled in the snares of sin. And when we heard this, the
words of this Conference so fired us that when we went away from the old man's
cell we longed with a keener ardour of soul than when we first came, for the
fulfilment of his teaching.
Return to Volume 34 Index