Subscribe
to CF
Be
first to know
Read our AAA review
from Catholic Culture
Our Mission
To
bring Jesus Christ; the Way, the Truth and the Life; to all who will follow,
according to scripture and tradition, per the Magisterium
of the Roman Catholic Church.
While you visit!
Listen
to
Radio
For the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. |
ST. BASIL
TREATISE DE SPIRITU SANCTO
CHAPTERS XVII TO XXX
CHAPTER XVII.
Against those who say that the Holy Ghost is not to be numbered with, but
numbered under, the Father and the Son. Wherein moreover there is a summary
notice of the faith concerning right sub-numeration.
41. WHAT,
however, they call sub-numeration,(5) and in what sense they use this word,
cannot even
be imagined without difficulty.
It is well known that
it was imported into our language from the "wisdom of the world;"(6)
but a point for our present consideration will be whether it has any immediate
relation to the subject under discussion. Those who are adepts in vain investigations
tell us that, while some nouns are common and of widely extended denotation,
others are more specific, and that the force of some is more limited than that
of others. Essence, for instance, is a common noun, predicable of all things
both animate and inanimate; while animal is more specific, being predicated
of fewer subjects than the former, though of more than those which are considered
under it, as it embraces both rational and irrational nature. Again, human
is more specific than animal, and man than human, and than man the individual
Peter, Paul or John.(1) Do they then mean by sub-numeration the division of
the common into its subordinate parts? But I should hesitate to believe they
have reached such a pitch of infatuation as to assert that the God of the universe,
like some common quality conceivable only by reason and without actual existence
in any hypostasis, is divided into subordinate divisions, and that then this
subdivision is called sub-numeration. This would hardly be said even by men
melancholy mad, for, besides its impiety, they are establishing the very opposite
argument to their own contention. For the subdivisions are of the same essence
as that from which they have been divided. The very obviousness of the absurdity
makes it difficult for us to find arguments to confute their unreasonableness;
so that really their folly looks like an advantage to them; just as soft and
yielding bodies offer no resistance, and therefore cannot be struck a stout
blow. It is impossible to bring a vigorous confutation to bear on a palpable
absurdity. The only course open to us is to pass by their abominable impiety
in silence. Yet our love for the brethren and the importunity of our opponents
makes silence impossible.
42. What
is it that they maintain? Look at the terms of their imposture. "We
assert that connumeration is appropriate to subjects of equal dignity, and
sub-numeration to those which vary in the direction of inferiority." "Why," I
rejoined, "do you say this? I fail to understand your extraordinary wisdom.
Do you mean that gold is numbered with gold, and that lead is unworthy of the
connumeration, but, because of the cheapness of the material, is subnumerated
to gold? And do you attribute so much importance to number as that it can either
exalt the value of what is cheap, or destroy the dignity of what is valuable?
Therefore, again, you will number gold under precious stones, and such precious
stones as are smaller and without lustre under those which are larger and brighter
in colour. But what will not be said by men who spend their time in nothing
else but either 'to tell or to hear some new thing'? Let these supporters of
impiety be classed for the future with Stoics and Epicureans. What sub-numeration
is even possible of things less valuable in relation to things very valuable?
How is a brass obol to be numbered under a golden stater? "Because," they
reply, "we do not speak of possessing two coins, but one and one." But
which of these is subnumerated to the other? Each is similarly mentioned. If
then you number each by itself, you cause an equality value by numbering them
in the same way but, if you join them, you make their value one by numbering
them one with the other. But if the sub-numeration belongs to the one which
is numbered second, then it is in the power of the counter to begin by counting
the brass coin. Let us, however, pass over the confutation of their ignorance,
and turn our argument to the main topic.
43. Do
you maintain that the Son is numbered under the Father, and the Spirit under
the Son, or do
you confine
your sub-numeration to the Spirit alone? If,
on the other hand, you apply this sub-numeration also to the Son, you revive
what is the same impious doctrine, the unlikeness of the substance, the lowliness
of rank, the coming into being in later time, and once for all, by this one
term, you will plainly again set circling all the blasphemies against the Only-begotten.
To controvert these blasphemies would be a longer task than my present purpose
admits of; and I am the less bound to undertake it because the impiety has
been refuted elsewhere to the best of my ability.(2) If on the other hand they
suppose the sub-numeration to benefit the Spirit alone, they must be taught
that the Spirit is spoken of together with the Lord in precisely the same manner
in which the Son is spoken of with the Father. "The name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost"(3) is delivered in like manner,
and, according to the co-ordination of words delivered in baptism, the relation
of the Spirit to the Son is the same as that of the Son to the Father. And
if the Spirit is co-ordinate with the Son, and the Son with the Father, it
is obvious that the Spirit is also co-ordinate with the Father. When then the
names are ranked in one and the same co-ordinate series,(1) what room is there
for speaking on the one hand of connumeration, and on the other of sub-numeration?
Nay, without exception, what thing ever lost its own nature by being numbered?
Is it not the fact that things when numbered remain what they naturally and
originally were, while number is adopted among us as a sign indicative of the
plurality of subjects? For some bodies we count, some we measure, and some
we weigh;(2) those which are by nature continuous we apprehend by measure;
to those which are divided we apply number (with the exception of those which
on account of their fineness are measured); while heavy objects are distinguished
by the inclination of the balance. It does not however follow that, because
we have invented for our convenience symbols to help us to arrive at the knowledge
of quantity, we have therefore changed the nature of the things signified.
We do not speak of "weighing under" one another things which are
weighed, even though one be gold and the other tin; nor yet do we "measure
under" things that are measured; and so in the same way we will not "number
under" things which are numbered. And if none of the rest of things admits
of sub-numeration how can they allege that the Spirit ought to be subnumerated?
Labouring as they do under heathen unsoundness, they imagine that things which
are inferior, either by grade of rank or subjection of substance, ought to
be subnumerated.
CHAPTER XVIII.
In what manner in the confession of the three hypostases we preserve the pious
dogma of the Monarchia. Wherein also is the refutation of them that allege
that the Spirit is subnumerated.(3)
44. In
delivering the formula of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost,(1) our
Lord did not connect
the
gift with number. He did not say "into First,
Second, and Third,"(2) nor yet "into one, two, and three, but He
gave us the boon of the knowledge of the faith which leads to salvation, by
means of holy names. So that what saves us is our faith. Number has been devised
as a symbol indicative of the quantity of objects. But these men, who bring
ruin on themselves from every possible source, have turned even the capacity
for counting against the faith. Nothing else undergoes any change in consequence
of the addition of number, and yet these men in the case of the divine nature
pay reverence to number, lest they should exceed the limits of the honour due
to the Paraclete. But, O wisest sirs, let the unapproachable be altogether
above and beyond number, as the ancient reverence of the Hebrews wrote the
unutterable name of God in peculiar characters, thus endeavouring to set forth
its infinite excellence. Count, if you must; but you must not by counting do
damage to the faith. Either let the ineffable be honoured by silence; or let
holy things be counted consistently with true religion. There is one God and
Father, one Only-begotten, and one Holy Ghost. We proclaim each of the hypostases
singly; and, when count we must, we do not let an ignorant arithmetic carry
us away to the idea of a plurality of Gods.
45. For
we do not count by way of addition, gradually making increase from unity
to multitude, and
saying
one, two, and three,--nor yet first, second,
and third. For "I," God, "am the first, and I am the last."(1)
And hitherto we have never, even at the present time, heard of a second God.
Worshipping as we do God of God, we both confess the distinction of the Persons,
and at the same time abide by the Monarchy. We do not fritter away the theology
(2) in a divided plurality, because one Form, so to say, united(3) in the invariableness
of the Godhead, is beheld in God the Father, and in God the Only begotten.
For the Son is in the Father and the Father in the Son; since such as is the
latter, such is the former, and such as is the former, such is the latter;
and herein is the Unity. So that according to the distinction of Persons, both
are one and one, and according to the community of Nature, one. How, then,
if one and one, are there not two Gods? Because we speak of a king, and of
the king's image, and not of two kings. The majesty is not cloven in two, nor
the glory divided. The sovereignty and authority over us is one, and so the
doxology ascribed by us is not plural but one;(4) because the honour paid to
the image passes on to the prototype. Now what in the one case the image is
by reason of imitation, that in the other case the Son is by nature; and as
in works of art the likeness is dependent on the form, so in the case or the
divine and uncompounded nature the union consists in the communion of the Godhead.(5)
One, moreover, is the Holy Spirit, and we speak of Him singly, conjoined as
He is to the one Father through the one Son, and through Himself completing
the adorable and blessed Trinity. Of Him the intimate relationship to the Father
and the Son is sufficiently declared by the fact of His not being ranked in
the plurality of the creation, but being spoken of singly; for he is not one
of many, but One. For as there is one Father and one Son, so is there one Holy
Ghost. He is consequently as far removed from created Nature as reason requires
the singular to be removed from compound and plural bodies; and He is in such
wise united to the Father and to the Son as unit has affinity with unit.
46. And
it is not from this source alone that our proofs of the natural communion
are derived, but
from the
fact that He is moreover said to be "of God;"(1)
not indeed in the sense in which "all things are of God,"(2) but
in the sense of proceeding out of God, not by generation, like the Son, but
as Breath of His mouth. But in no way is the "mouth" a member, nor
the Spirit breath that is dissolved; but the word "mouth" is used
so far as it can be appropriate to God, and the Spirit is a Substance having
life, gifted with supreme power of sanctification. Thus the dose relation is
made plain, while the mode of the ineffable existence is safeguarded. He is
moreover styled 'Spirit of Christ,' as being by nature closely related to Him.
Wherefore "If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His."(3)
Hence He alone worthily glorifies the Lord, for, it is said, "He shall
glorify me,"(4) not as the creature, but as "Spirit of truth,"(5)
dearly shewing forth the truth in Himself, and, as Spirit of wisdom, in His
own greatness revealing "Christ the Power of God and the wisdom of God."(6)
And as Paraclete(7) He expresses in Himself the goodness of the Paraclete who
sent Him, and in His own dignity manifests the majesty of Him from whom He
proceeded. There is then on the one hand a natural glory, as light is the glory
of the sun; and on the other a glory bestowed judicially and of free will 'ab
extra' on them that are worthy. The latter is twofold. "A son," it
is said, "honoureth his father, and a servant his master."(1) Of
these two the one, the servile, is given by the creature; the other, which
may be called the intimate, is fulfilled by the Spirit. For, as our Lord said
of Himself, "I have glorified Thee on the earth: I have finished the work
which thou gavest me to do;"(2) so of the Paraclete He says "He shall
glorify me: for He shall receive of mine, and shall show it unto you."(3)
And as the Son is glorified of the Father when He says "I have both glorified
it and will glorify it(4) again,"(5) so is the Spirit glorified through
His communion with both Father and Son, and through the testimony of the Only-begotten
when He says "All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men:
but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men."(6)
47. And
when, by means of the power that enlightens us, we fix our eyes on the beauty
of the image
of the invisible
God, and through the image are led
up to the supreme beauty of the spectacle of the archetype, then, I ween, is
with us inseparably the Spirit of knowledge, in Himself bestowing on them time
love the vision of the truth the power of beholding the Image, not making the
exhibition from without, but in Himself leading on to the full knowledge. "No
man knoweth the Father save the Son."(7) And so "no man can say that
Jesus is the Lord but by th Holy Ghost."(8) For it is not said through
the Spirit, but by the Spirit, and "God is a spirit, and they that worship
Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth,"(9) as it is written "in
thy light shall we see light,"(10) namely by the illumination of the Spirit, "the
true light which lighteth every man that cometh into the world."(11) It
results that in Himself He shows the glory of the Only begotten, and on true
worshippers He in Himself bestows the knowledge of God. Thus the way of the
knowledge of God lies from One Spirit through the One Son to the One Father,
and conversely the natural Goodness and the inherent Holiness and the royal
Dignity extend from the Father through the Only-begotten to the Spirit. Thus
there is both acknowledgment of the hypostases and the true dogma of the Monarchy
is not lost.(1) They on the other hand who support their sub-numeration by
talking of first and second and third ought to be informed that into the undefiled
theology of Christians they are importing the polytheism of heathen error.
No other result can be achieved by the fell device of sub-numeration than the
confession of a first, a second, and a third God. For us is sufficient the
order prescribed by the Lord. He who confuses this order will be no less guilty
of transgressing the law than are the impious heathen.
Enough
has been now said to prove, in contravention of their error, that the communion
of Nature is
in no wise
dissolved by the manner of sub-numeration.
Let us, however, make a concession to our contentious and feeble minded adversary,
and grant that what is second to anything is spoken of in sub-numeration to
it. Now let us see what follows. "The first man "it is said "is
of the earth earthy, the second man is the Lord from heaven."(2) Again "that
was not first which is spiritual but that which is natural and afterward that
which is spiritual."(3) If then the second is subnumerated to the first,
and the subnumerated is inferior in dignity to that to which it was subnumerated,
according to you the spiritual is inferior in honour to the natural, and the
heavenly man to the earthy.
CHAPTER XIX.
Against those who assert that the Spirit ought not to be glorified.
48. "BE it so," it is rejoined, "but glory is by no means so
absolutely due to the Spirit as to require His exaltation by us in doxologies." Whence
then could we get demonstrations of the dignity of the our Spirit, "passing
all understanding,"(4) if His communion with the Father and the Son were
not reckoned by our opponents as good for testimony of His rank? It is, at
all events, possible for us to arrive to a certain extent at intelligent apprehension
of the sublimity of His nature and of His unapproachable power, by looking
at the meaning of His title, and at the magnitude of His operations, and by
His good gifts bestowed on us or rather on all creation. He is called Spirit,
as "God is a Spirit,"(1) and "the breath of our nostrils, the
anointed of the Lord."(2) He is called holy,(3) as the Father is holy,
and the Son is holy, for to the creature holiness was brought in from without,
but to the Spirit holiness is the fulfilment of nature, and it is for this
reason that He is described not as being sanctified, but as sanctifying. He
is called good,(4) as the Father is good, and He who was begotten of the Good
is good, and to the Spirit His goodness is essence. He is called upright,(5)
as "the Lord is upright,"(6) in that He is Himself truth,(7) and
is Himself Righteousness,(8) having no divergence nor leaning to one side or
to the other, on account of the immutability of His substance. He is called
Paraclete, like the Only begotten, as He Himself says," I will ask the
Father, and He will give you another comforter."(9) Thus names are borne
by the Spirit in common with the Father and the Son, and He gets these titles
from His natural and close relationship. From what other source could they
be derived? Again He is called royal,(10) Spirit of truth,(11) and Spirit of
wisdom.(12) "The Spirit of God," it is said "hath made me,"(13)
and God filled Bezaleel with "the divine Spirit of wisdom and understanding
and knowledge."(14) Such names as these are super-eminent and mighty,
but they do not transcend His glory.
49. And
His operations, what are they? For majesty ineffable, and for numbers innumerable.
How shall
we form
a conception of what extends beyond the ages?
What were His operations before that creation whereof we can conceive? How
great the grace which He conferred on creation? What the power exercised by
Him over the ages to come? He existed; He pre-existed; He co-existed with the
Father and the Son before the ages. It follows that, even if you can conceive
of anything beyond the ages, you will find the Spirit yet further above and
beyond. And if you think of the creation, the powers of the heavens were established
by the Spirit,(1) the establishment being understood to refer to disability
to fall away from good. For it is from the Spirit that the powers derive their
close relationship to God, their inability to change to evil, and their continuance
in blessedness. Is it Christ's advent? The Spirit is forerunner. Is there the
incarnate presence? The Spirit is inseparable. Working of miracles, and gifts
of healing are through the Holy Spirit. Demons were driven out by the Spirit
of God. The devil was brought to naught by the presence of the Spirit. Remission
of Sins was by the gift of the Spirit, for "ye were washed, ye were sanctified,
... in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the holy Spirit of our God."(2)
There is close relationship with God through the Spirit, for "God hath
sent forth the Spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying Abba, Father."(3)
The resurrection from the dead is effected by the operation of the Spirit,
for "Thou sendest forth thy spirit, they are created; and Thou renewest
the face of the earth."(4) If here creation may be taken to mean the bringing
of the departed to life again, how mighty is not the operation of the Spirit,
Who is to us the dispenser of the life that follows on the resurrection, and
attunes our souls to the spiritual life beyond? Or if here by creation is meant
the change to a better condition of those who in this life have fallen into
sin, (for it is so understood according to the usage of Scripture, as in the
words of Paul "if any man be in Christ he is a new creature"(5)),
the renewal which takes place in this life, and the transmutation from our
earthly and sensuous life to the heavenly conversation which takes place in
us through the Spirit, then our souls are exalted to the highest pitch of admiration.
With these thoughts before us are we to be afraid of going beyond due bounds
in the extravagance of the honour we pay? Shall we not rather fear lest, even
though we seem to give Him the highest names which the thoughts of man can
conceive or man's tongue utter, we let our thoughts about Him fall too low?
It is
the Spirit which says, as the Lord says, "Get thee down, and go
with them, doubting nothing: for I have sent them."(6) Are these the words
of an inferior, or of one in dread? "Separate me Barnabas and Saul for
the work whereunto I have called them."(7) Does a slave speak thus? And
Isaiah, "The Lord God and His Spirit hath sent me,"(1) and "the
Spirit came down from the Lord and guided them."(2) And pray do not again
understand by this guidance some humble service, for the Word witnesses that
it was the work of God;--"Thou leddest thy people," it is said "like
a flock,"(3) and "Thou that leadest Joseph like a flock,"(4)
and "He led them on safely, so that they feared not."(5) Thus when
yon hear that when the Comforter is come, He will put you in remembrance, and "guide
you into all truth."(6) do not misrepresent the meaning.
50. But,
it is said that "He maketh intercession for us."(7) It
follows then that, as the suppliant is inferior to the benefactor, so far is
the Spirit inferior in dignity to God. But have you never heard concerning
the Only-begotten that He "is at the right hand of God, who also maketh
intercession for us"?(8) Do not, then, because the Spirit is in you,--if
indeed He is at all in you,--nor yet because He teaches us who were blinded,
and guides us to the choice of what profits us,--do not for this reason allow
yourself to be deprived of the right and holy opinion concerning Him. For to
make the loving kindness of your benefactor a ground of ingratitude were indeed
a very extravagance of unfairness. "Grieve not the Holy Spirit;"(9)
hear the words of Stephen, the first fruits of the martyrs, when he reproaches
the people for their rebellion and disobedience; "you do always," he
says, "resist the Holy Ghost;"(10) and again Isaiah,--"They
vexed His Holy Spirit, therefore He was turned to be their enemy;"(11)
and in another passage, "the house of Jacob angered the Spirit of the
Lord."(12) Are not these passages indicative of authoritative power? I
leave it to the judgment of my readers to determine what opinions we ought
to hold when we hear these passages; whether we are to regard the Spirit as
an instrument, a subject, of equal rank with the creature, and a fellow servant
of ourselves, or whether, on the contrary, to the ears of the pious the mere
whisper of this blasphemy is not most grievous. Do you call the Spirit a servant?
But, it is said, "the servant knoweth not what his Lord doeth,"(1)
and yet the Spirit knoweth the things of God, as "the spirit of man that
is in him."(2)
CHAPTER XX.
Against those who maintain that the Spirit is in the rank neither of a servant
nor of a master, but in that of the free.
51. HE
is not a slave, it is said; not a master, but free. Oh the terrible insensibility,
the pitiable
audacity,
of them that maintain this! Shall I rather
lament in them their ignorance or their blasphemy? They try to insult the doctrines
that concern the divine nature(3) by comparing them with the human, and endeavour
to apply to the ineffable nature of God that common custom of human life whereby
the difference of degrees is variable, not perceiving that among men no one
is a slave by nature. For men are either brought under a yoke of slavery by
conquest, as when prisoners are taken in war; or they are enslaved on account
of poverty, as the Egyptians were oppressed by Pharaoh; or, by a wise and mysterious
dispensation, the worst children are by their fathers' order condemned to serve
the wiser and the better;(4) and this any righteous enquirer into the circumstances
would declare to be not a sentence of condemnation but a benefit. For it is
more profitable that the man who, through lack of intelligence, has no natural
principle of rule within himself, should become the chattel of another, to
the end that, being guided by the reason of his master, he may be like a chariot
with a charioteer, or a boat with a steersman seated at the tiller. For this
reason Jacob by his father's blessing became lord of Esau,(5) in order that
the foolish son, who had not intelligence, his proper guardian, might, even
though he wished it not, be benefited by his prudent brother. So Canaan shall
be "a servant unto his brethren"(6) because, since his father Ham
was unwise, he was uninstructed in virtue. In this world, then, it is thus
that men are made slaves, but they who have escaped poverty or war, or do not
require the tutelage of others, are free. It follows that even though one man
be called master and another servant, nevertheless, both in view of our mutual
equality of rank and as chattels of our Creator, we are all fellow slaves.
But in that other world what can yon bring out of bondage? For no sooner were
they created than bondage was commenced. The heavenly bodies exercise no rule
over one another, for they are unmoved by ambition, but all bow down to God,
and render to Him alike the awe which is due to Him as Master and the glower
which fails to Him as Creator. For "a son honoureth his father and a servant
his master,"(1) and from all God asks one of these two things; for "if
I then be a Father where is my honour? and if I be a Master where is my fear?"(2)
Otherwise the life of all men, if it were not under the oversight of a master,
would be most pitiable; as is the condition of the apostate powers who, because
they stiffen their neck against God Almighty, fling off the reins of their
bondage,--not that their natural constitution is different; but the cause is
in their disobedient disposition to their Creator. Whom then do you call free?
Him who has no King? Him who has neither power to rule another nor willingness
to be ruled? Among all existent beings no such nature is to be found. To entertain
such a conception of the Spirit is obvious blasphemy. If He is a creature of
course He serves with all the rest, for "all things," it is said "are
thy servants,"(3) but if He is above Creation, then He shares in royalty.(4)
CHAPTER XXI.
Proof from Scripture that the Spirit is called Lord.
52. BUT
why get an unfair victory for our argument by fighting over these undignified
questions, when
it is
within our power to prove that the excellence
of the glory is beyond dispute by adducing more lofty considerations? If, indeed,
we retreat what we have been taught by Scripture, every one of the Pneumatomachi
will peradventure raise a loud and vehement outcry, stop their ears, pick up
stones or anything else that comes to hand for a weapon, and charge against
us. But our own security must not be regarded by us before the truth. We have
learnt from the Apostle, "the Lord direct your hearts into the love of
God and into the patient waiting for Christ"(1) for our tribulations.
Who is the Lord that directs into the love of God and into the patient waiting
for Christ for tribulations? Let those men answer us who are for making a slave
of the Holy Spirit. For if the argument had been about God the Father, it would
certainly have said, 'the Lord direct you into His own love,' or if about the
Son, it would have added 'into His own patience.' Let them then seek what other
Person there is who is worthy to be honoured with the title of Lord. And parallel
with this is that other passage, "and the Lord make you to increase and
abound in love one toward another, and toward all men, even as we do towards
you; to the end He may establish your hearts unblamable in holiness before
God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all His saints."(1)
Now what Lord does he entreat to stablish the hearts of the faithful at Thessalonica,
unblamable in holiness before God even our Father, at the coming of our Lord?
Let those answer who place the Holy Ghost among the ministering spirits that
are sent forth on service. They cannot. Wherefore let them hear yet another
testimony which distinctly calls the Spirit Lord. "The Lord," it
is said, "is that Spirit;" and again "even as from the Lord
the Spirit."(2) But to leave no ground for objection, I will quote the
actual words of the Apostle;--"For even unto this day remaineth the same
veil untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament, which yell is done away
in Christ. ... Nevertheless, when it shall turn to the Lord, the veil shall
be taken away. Now the Lord is that Spirit."(8) Why does he speak thus?
Because he who abides in the bare sense of the letter, and in it busies himself
with the observances of the Law, has, as it were, got his own heart enveloped
in the Jewish acceptance of the letter, like a veil; and this be-falls him
because of his ignorance that the bodily observance of the Law is done away
by the presence of Christ, in that for the future the types are transferred
to the reality. Lamps are made needless by the advent of the sun; and, on the
appearance of the truth, the occupation of the Law is gone, and prophecy is
hushed into silence. He, on the contrary, who has been empowered to look down
into the depth of the meaning of the Law, and, after passing through the obscurity
of the letter, as through a veil, to arrive within things unspeakable, is like
Moses taking off the veil when he spoke with God. He, too, turns from the letter
to the Spirit. So with the veil on the face of Moses corresponds the obscurity
of the teaching of the Law, and spiritual contemplation with the turning to
the Lord. He, then, who in the reading of the Law takes away the letter and
turns to the Lord,--and the Lord is now called the Spirit,--becomes moreover
like Moses, who had his face glorified by the manifestation of God. For just
as objects which lie near brilliant colours are themselves tinted by the brightness
which is shed around, so is be who fixes his gaze firmly on the Spirit by the
Spirit's glory somehow transfigured into greater splendour, having his heart
lighted up, as it were, by some light streaming from the truth of the Spirit.(1)
And, this is "being changed from(2) the glory of the Spirit "into" His
own "glory," not in niggard degree, nor dimly and indistinctly, but
as we might expect any one to be who is enlightened by(3) the Spirit. Do you
not, O man, fear the Apostle when he says "Ye are the temple of God, and
the Spirit of God dwelleth in you"?(4) Could he ever have! brooked to
honour with the title of "temple" the quarters of a slave? How can
he who calls Scripture "God-inspired,"(5) because it was written
through the inspiration of the Spirit, use the language of one who insults
and belittles Him?
CHAPTER XXII.
Establishment of the natural communion of the Spirit from His being, equally
with the Father and the Son, unapproachable in thought.(6)
53. MOREOVER
the surpassing excellence of the nature of the Spirit is to be learned not
only from His
having the
same title as the Father and the Son,
and sharing in their operations, but also from His being, like the Father and
the Son, unapproachable in thought. For what our Lord says of the Father as
being above and beyond human conception, and what He says of the Son, this
same language He uses also of the Holy Ghost. "O righteous Father," He
says, "the world hath not known Thee,"(7) meaning here by the world
not the complex whole compounded of heaven and earth, but this life of ours
subject to death,(8) and exposed to innumerable vicissitudes. And when discoursing
of Himself He says, "Yet a little while and the world seeth me no more,
but ye see me;"(1) again in this passage, applying the word world to those
who being bound down by this material and carnal life, and beholding(2) the
truth by material sight alone,(8) were ordained, through their unbelief in
the resurrection, to see our Lord no more with the eyes of the heart. And He
said the same concerning the Spirit. "The Spirit of truth," He says, "whom
the world cannot receive, because it seeth Him not, neither knoweth Him: but
ye know Him, for He dwelleth with you."(4) For the carnal man, who has
never trained his mind to contemplation,(5) but rather keeps it buried deep
in lust of the flesh,(6) as in mud, is powerless to look up to the spiritual
light of the truth. And so the world, that is life enslaved by the affections
of the flesh, can no more receive the grace of the Spirit than a weak eye the
light of a sunbeam. But the Lord, who by His teaching bore witness to purity
of life, gives to His disciples the power of now beth beholding and contemplating
the Spirit. For "now," He says, "Ye are clean through the word
which I have spoken unto you,"(7) wherefore "the world cannot receive
Him, because it seeth Him not, ... but ye know Him; for he dwelleth with you."(8)
And so says Isaiah;--"He that spread forth the earth and that which cometh
out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and Spirit to them
that trample on it"(9); for they that trample clown earthly things and
rise above them are borne witness to as worthy of the gift of the Holy Ghost.
What then ought to be thought of Him whom the world cannot receive, and Whom
saints alone can contemplate through pureness of heart? What kind of honours
can be deemed adequate to Him?
CHAPTER XXIII.
The glorifying of the enumeration of His attributes.
54.(10)
Now of the rest of the Powers each is believed to be in a circumscribed place.
The angel
who stood
by Cornelius(1) was not at one and the same moment
with Philip;(2) nor yet did the angel who spoke with Zacharias from the altar
at the same time occupy his own pose in heaven. But the Spirit is believed
to have been operating at the saint time in Habakkuk and in Daniel at Babylon,(3)
and to have been at the prison with Jeremiah,(4) and with Ezekiel at the Chebar.(5)
For the Spirit of the Lord filleth the world,(6) and "whither shall I
go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?"(7) And,
in the words of the Prophet, "For I am with you, saith the Lord ... and
my spirit remaineth among you."(8) But what nature is it becoming to assign
to Him who is omnipresent, and exists together with God? The nature which is
all-embracing, or one which is confined to particular places, like that which
our argument shews the nature of angels to be? No one would so say. Shall we
not then highly exalt Him who is in His nature divine, in His greatness infinite,
in His operations powerful, in the blessings He confers, good? Shall we not
give Him glory? And I understand glory to mean nothing else than the enumeration
of the wonders which are His own. It follows then that either we are forbidden
by our antagonists even to mention the good things which flow to us from Him.
or on the other hand that the mere recapitulation of His attributes is the
fullest possible attribution of glory. For not even in the case of the God
and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ and of the Only begotten Son, are we capable
of giving Them glory otherwise than by recounting, to the extent of our powers,
all the wonders that belong to Them.
CHAPTER XXIV.
Proof of the absurdity of the refusal to glorify the Spirit, from the comparison
of things glorified in creation.
55. FURTHERMORE
man crowned with glory and honour,"(9) and "glory,
honour and peace" are laid up by promise "to every man that worketh
good."(10) There is moreover a special and peculiar glory for Israelites "to
whom," it is said "pertaineth the adoption and the glory ... and
the service,"(1) and the Psalmist speaks of a certain glory of his own, "that
my glory may sing praise to Thee(2);" and again "Awake up my glory"(3)
and according to the Apostle there is a certain glory of sun and moon and stars,(4)
and "the ministration of condemnation is glorious."(5) While then
so many things are glorified, do you wish the Spirit alone of all things to
be unglorified? Yet the Apostle says "the ministration of the Spirit is
glorious."(6) How then can He Himself be unworthy of glory? How according
to the Psalmist can the glory of the just man be great(7) and according to
you the glory of the Spirit none? How is there not a plain peril from such
arguments of our bringing on ourselves the sin from which there is no escape?
If the man who is being saved by works of righteousness glorifies even them
that fear the Lord(8) much less would be deprive the Spirit of the glory which
is His due.
Grant,
they say, that He is to be glorified, but not with the Father and the Son.
But what reason
is there
in giving up the place appointed by the Lord
for the Spirit, and inventing some other? What reason is there for robbing
of His share of glory Him Who is everywhere associated with the Godhead; in
the confession of the Faith, in the baptism of redemption, in the working of
miracles, in the indwelling of the saints, in the graces bestowed on obedience?
For there is not even one single gift which reaches creation without the Holy
Ghost;(9) when not even a single word can be spoken in defence of Christ except
by them that are aided by the Spirit, as we have learnt in the Gospels from
our Lord and Saviour.(10) And I know not whether any one who has been par-taker
of the Holy Spirit will consent that we should overlook all this, forget His
fellowship in all things, and tear the Spirit asunder from the Father and the
Son. Where then are we to take Him and rank Him? With the creature? Yet all
the creature is in bondage, but the Spirit maketh free. "And where the
Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty."(11) Many arguments might be
adduced to them that it is unseemly to coordinate the Holy Spirit with created
nature, but for the present I will pass them by. Were I indeed to bring forward,
in a manner befitting the dignity of the discussion, all the proofs always
available on our side, and so overthrow the objections of our opponents, a
lengthy dissertation would be required, and my readers might be worn out by
my prolixity. I therefore propose to reserve this matter for a special treatise,(1)
and to apply thyself to the points now more immediately before us.
56. Let
us then examine the points one by one. He is good by nature, in the same
way as the Father
is good,
and the Son is good; the creature on the other
hand shares in goodness by choosing the good. He knows "The deep things
of God;"(2) the creature receives the manifestation of ineffable things
through the Spirit. He quickens together with God, who produces and preserves
all things alive,(3) and together with the Son, who gives life. "He that
raised up Christ from the dead," it is said, "shall also quicken
your mortal bodies by the spirit that dwelleth in you;"(4) and again "my
sheep hear my voice, ... and I give unto them eternal life;"(5) but Spirit" also,
it is said, "giveth life,"(6) and again "the Spirit," it
is said, "is life, because of righteousness."(7) And the Lord bears
witness that "it is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing."(8)
How then shall we alienate the Spirit from His quickening power, and make Him
belong to lifeless nature? Who is so contentious, who is so utterly without
the heavenly gift,(9) and unfed by God's good words, who is so devoid of part
and lot in eternal hopes, as to sever the Spirit from the Godhead and rank
Him with the creature?
57. Now
it is urged that the Spirit is in us as a gift from God, and that the gift
is not reverenced
with the
same honour as that which is attributed
to the giver. The Spirit is a gift of God, but a gift of life, for the law
of "the Spirit of life," it is said, "hath made" us "free;"(10)
and a gift of power, for "ye shall receive power after that the Holy Ghost
is come upon you."(11) Is He on this account to be lightly esteemed? Did
not God also bestow His Son as a free gift to mankind? "He that spared
not His own Son," it is said, "but delivered Him up for us all, how
shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?"(1) And in another
place, "that we might truly know the things that are freely given us of
God,"(2) in reference to the mystery of the Incarnation. It follows then
that the maintainers of such arguments, in making the greatness of God's loving
kindness an occasion of blasphemy, have really surpassed the ingratitude of
the Jews. They find fault with the Spirit because He gives us freedom to call
God our Father. "For God hath sent forth the Spirit of His Son into" our "hearts
crying Abba, Father,"(3) that the voice of the Spirit may become the very
voice of them that have received him.
CHAPTER XXV.
That Scripture
uses the words "in" or "by," <greek>en</greek>,
cf. note on p. 3, in place of "with." Wherein also it is proved that
the word "and" has the same force as "with."
58. IT
is, however, asked by our opponents, how it is that Scripture nowhere describes
the Spirit as
glorified
together with the Father and the Son, but
carefully avoids the use of the expression "with the Spirit," while
it everywhere prefers to ascribe glory "in Him" as being the fitter
phrase. I should, for my own part, deny that the word in [or by] implies lower
dignity than the word "with;" I should main-pain on the contrary
that, rightly understood, it leads us up to the highest possible meaning. This
is the case where, as we have observed, it often stands instead of with; as
for instance, "I will go into thy house in burnt offerings,"(4) instead
of with burnt offerings and "he brought them forth also by silver and
gold,"(5) that is to say with silver and gold and "thou goest not
forth in our armies"(6) instead of with our armies, and innumerable similar
passages. In short I should very much like to learn from this newfangled philosophy
what kind of glory the Apostle ascribed by the word in, according to the interpretation
which our opponents proffer as derived from Scripture, for I have nowhere found
the formula "To Thee, O Father, be honour and glory, through Thy only
begotten Son, by [or in] the Holy Ghost,"--a form which to our opponents
comes, so to say, as naturally as the air they breathe. You may indeed find
each of these clauses separately,(1) but they will nowhere be able to show
them to us arranged in this conjunction. If, then, they want exact conformity
to what is written, let them give us exact references. If, on the other hand,
they make concession to custom, they must not make us an exception to such
a privilege.
59. As
we find both expressions in use among the faithful, we use both; in the belief
that full glory is
equally given to the Spirit by both. The mouths,
how, ever, of revilers of the truth may best be stopped by the preposition
which, while it has the same meaning as that of the Scriptures, is not so wieldy
a weapon for our opponents,(indeed it is now an object of their attack) and
is used instead of the conjunction and. For to say "Paul and Silvanus
and Timothy" (2) is precisely the same thing as to say Paul with Timothy
and Silvanus; for the connexion of the names is, preserved by either mode of
expression. The Lord says "The Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost."(4)
If I say the Father and the Son with the Holy Ghost shall I make, any difference
in the sense? Of the connexion of names by means of the conjunction and the
instances are many. We read "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the
love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost,"(4) and again "I
beseech you for the Lord Jesus Christ's sake, and for the love of the Spirit."(5)
Now if we wish to use with instead of and, what difference shall we have made?
I do not see; unless any one according to hard and fast grammatical rules might
prefer the conjunction as copulative and making the union stronger, and reject
the preposition as of inferior force. But if we had to defend ourselves on
these points I do not suppose we should require a defence of many words. As
it is, their argument is not about syllables nor yet about this or that sound
of a word, but about things differing. most widely in power and in truth. It
is for this reason that, while the use of the syllables is really a matter
of no importance whatever, our opponents are making the endeavour to authorise
some syllables, and bunt out others from the Church. For my own part, although
the usefulness of the word is obvious as soon as it is heard, I will nevertheless
set forth the arguments which led our fathers to adopt the reasonable coarse
of employing the preposition "with."(6) It does indeed equally well
with the preposition "and," confute the mischief of Sabellius;(1)
and it sets forth quite as well as "and" the distinction of the hypostases,
as in the words "I and my Father will come,"(2) and "I and my
Father are one."(3) In addition to this the proof it contains of the eternal
fellowship and uninterrupted conjunction is excellent. For to say that the
Son is with the Father is to exhibit at once the distinction of the hypostases,
and the inseparability of the fellowship. The same thing is observable even
in mere human matters, for the conjunction "and" intimates that there
is a common element in an action, while the preposition "with" declares
in some sense as well the communion in action. As, for instance;-Paul and Timothy
sailed to MaCedonia, but both Tychicus and Onesimus were sent to the Colossians.
Hence we learn that they did the same thing. But suppose we are told that they
sailed with, and were sent with? Then we are informed in addition that they
carried out the action in company with one another. Thus while the word "with" upsets
the error of Sabellius as no other word can, it routs also sinners who err
in the very opposite direction; those, I mean, who separate the Son from the
Father and the Spirit from the Son, by intervals of time.(4)
60. As
compared with "in," there is this difference, that while "with" sets
forth the mutual conjunction of the parties associated, --as, for example,
of those who sail with, or dwell with, or do anything else in common, "in" shews
their relation to that matter in which they happen to be acting. For we no
sooner hear the words "sail in" or "dwell in" than we form
the idea of the boat or the house. Such is the distinction between these words
in ordinary usage; and laborious investigation might discover further. illustrations.
I have no time to examine into the nature of the syllables. Since then it has
been shewn that "with" most clearly gives the sense of conjunction,
let it be declared, if you will, to be under safe-conduct, and cease to wage
your savage and truceless war against it. Nevertheless, though the word is
naturally thus auspicious, yet if any one likes, in the ascription of praise,
to couple the names by the syllable "and," and to give glory, as
we have taught in the Gospel, in the formula of baptism, Father and Son and
Holy Ghost,(1) be it so: no one will make any objection. On these conditions,
if you will, let us come to terms. But our foes would rather surrender their
tongues than accept this word. It is this that rouses against us their implacable
and truceless war. We must offer the ascription of glory to God, it is contended,
in the Holy Ghost, and not and to the Holy Ghost, and they passionately cling
to this word in, as though it lowered the Spirit. It will therefore be not
unprofitable to speak at greater length about it; and I shall be astonished
if they do not: when they have heard what we have to urge, reject the in as
itself a traitor to their cause, and a deserter to the side of tile glory of
tile Spirit.
CHAPTER XXVI.
That the
word "in," in
as many senses as it bears, is understood of the Spirit.
61. Now,
short and simple as this utter-ante is, it appears to me, as I consider it
that its meanings
are many
and various. For of the senses in which "in" is
used, we find that all help our conceptions of the Spirit. Form is said to
be in Matter; Power to be in what is capable of it; Habit to be in him who
is affected by it; and so on.(2) Therefore, inasmuch as the Holy Spirit perfects
rational beings, completing their excellence, He is analogous to Form. For
he, who no longer "lives after the flesh,"(3) but, being "led
by the Spirit of God,"(4) is called a Son of God, being "conformed
to tile image of the Son of God,"(5) is described as spiritual. And as
is the power of seeing in the healthy eye, so is the operation of the Spirit
in the purified soul. Wherefore also Paul prays for the Ephesians that they
may have their "eyes enlightened" by "the Spirit of wisdom."(1)
And as the art in him who has acquired it, so is the grace of the Spirit in
the recipient ever present, though not continuously in operation. For as the
art is potentially in the artist, but only in operation when he is working
in accordance with it, so also the Spirit is ever present with those that are
worthy, but works, as need requires, in prophecies, or in healings, or in some
other actual carrying into effect of His potential action.(2) Furthermore as
in our bodies is health, or heat, or, generally, their variable conditions,
so, very frequently is the Spirit in the soul; since He does not abide with
those who, on account of the instability of their will, easily reject the grace
which they have received. An instance of this is seen in Saul,(3) and the seventy
elders of the children of Israel, except Eldad and Medad, with whom alone the
Spirit appears to have remained,(4) and, generally, any one similar to these
in character. And like reason in the soul, which is at one time the thought
in the heart, and at another speech uttered by the tongue,(5) so is the Holy
Spirit, as when He "beareth witness with our spirit,"(6) and when
lie "cries in our hearts, Abba, Father,"(7) or when He speaks on
our behalf, as it is said, "It is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of
our Father which speaketh in you."(8) Again, the Spirit is conceived of,
in relation to the distribution of gifts, as a whole in parts. For we all are "members
one of another, having girls differing according to the grace that is given
us."(9) Wherefore "the eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need
of thee; nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you,"(10) but
all together complete the Body of Christ in the Unity of the Spirit, and render
to one another the needful aid that comes of the gifts. "But God hath
set the members in the body, every one of them, as it hath pleased Him."(1)
But "the members have the same care for one another,"(2) according
to the inborn spiritual communion of their sympathy. Wherefore, "whether
one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured,
all the members rejoice with it."(3) And as parts in the whole so are
we individually in the Spirit, because we all "were baptized in one body
into one spirit."(4)
62. It
is an extraordinary statement, but it is none the less true, that the Spirit
is frequently spoken
of as
the place of them that are being sanctified,
and it will become evident that even by this figure the Spirit, so far from
being degraded, is rather glorified. For words applicable to the body are,
for the sake of clearness, frequently transferred in scripture to spiritual
conceptions. Accordingly we find the Psalmist, even in reference to God, saying "Be
Thou to me a champion God and a strong place to save me" (5) and concerning
the Spirit "behold there is place by me, and stand upon a rock."(8)
Plainly meaning the place or contemplation in the Spirit wherein, after Moses
had entered thither, he was able to see God intelligibly manifested to him.
This is the special and peculiar place of true worship; for it is said "Take
heed to thyself that thou offer not thy burnt offerings in every place . .
. but in the place the Lord thy God shall choose."(7) Now what is a spiritual
burnt offering? "The sacrifice of praise."(8) And in what place do
we offer it? In the Holy Spirit. Where have we learnt this? From the Lord himself
in the words "The true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit
and in truth."(9) This place Jacob saw and said "The Lord is in this
place."(10) It follows that the Spirit is verily the place of the saints
and the saint is the proper place for the Spirit, offering himself as he does
for the indwelling of God, and called God's Temple.(11) So Paul speaks in Christ,
saying "In the sight of God we speak in Christ,"(12) and Christ in
Paul, as he himself says "Since ye seek a proof ne Christ speaking in
me."(13) So also in the Spirit he speaketh mysteries,(14) and again the
Spirit speaks in him.(15)
63. In
relation to the originate,(1) then, the Spirit is said to be in them "in
divers portions and in divers manners,"(2) while in relation to the Father
and the Son it is more consistent with true religion to assert Him not to be
in but to be with. For the grace flowing from Him when He dwells in those that
are worthy, and carries out His own operations, is well described as existing
in those that are able to receive Him. On the other hand His essential existence
before the ages, and His ceaseless abiding with Son and Father, cannot be contemplated
without requiring titles expressive of eternal conjunction. For absolute and
real co-existence is predicated in the case of things which are mutually inseparable.
We say, for instance, that beat exists in the hot iron, but in the case of
the actual fire it co-exists; and, similarly, that health exists in the body,
but that life co-exists with the soul. It follows that wherever the fellowship
is intimate, congenital,(3) and inseparable, the word with is more expressive,
suggesting, as it does, the idea of inseparable fellowship. Where on the other
hand the grace flowing from the Spirit naturally comes and goes, it is properly
and truly said to exist in, even if on account of the firmness of the recipients'
disposition to good the grace abides with them continually. Thus whenever we
have in mind the Spirit's proper rank, we contemplate Him as being with the
Father and the Son, but when we think of the grace that flows from Him operating
on those who participate in it, we say that the Spirit is in us. And the doxology
which we offer "in the Spirit" is not an acknowledgment of His rank;
it is rather a confession of our own weakness, while we shew that we are not
sufficient to glorify Him of ourselves, but our sufficiency(1) is in the Holy
Spirit. Enabled in, [or by,] Him we render thanks to our God for the benefits
we have received, according to the measure of our purification from evil, as
we receive one a larger and another a smaller share of the aid of the Spirit,
that we may offer "the sacrifice of praise to God."(2) According
to one use, then, it is thus that we offer our thanksgiving, as the true religion
requires, in the Spirit; although it is not quite unobjectionable that any
one should testify of himself "the Spirit of God is in me, and I offer
glory after being made wise through the grace that flows from Him." For
to a Paul it is becoming to say "I think also that I have the Spirit of
God,"(3) and again, "that good thing which was committed to thee
keep by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us."(4) And of Daniel it is fitting
to say that "the Holy Spirit of God is in him,"(5) and similarly
of men who are like these in virtue.
64. Another
sense may however be given to the phrase, that just as the Father is seen
in the Son,
so is the
Son in the Spirit. The "worship in the Spirit" suggests
the idea of the operation of our intelligence being carried on in the light,
as may be learned from the words spoken to the woman of Samaria. Deceived as
she was by the customs of her country into the belief that worship was local,
our Lord, with the object of giving her better instruction, said that worship
ought to be offered "in Spirit and in Truth,"(6) plainly meaning
by the Truth, Himself. As then we speak of the worship offered in the Image
of God the Father as worship in the Son, so too do we speak of worship in the
Spirit as shewing in Himself the Godhead of the Lord. Wherefore even in our
worship the Holy Spirit is inseparable from the Father and the Son. If you
remain outside the Spirit you will not be able even to worship at all; and
on your becoming in Him you will in no wise be able to dissever Him from God;--any
more than you will divorce light from visible objects. For it is impossible
to behold the Image of the invisible God except by the enlightenment of the
Spirit, and impracticable for him to fix his gaze on the Image to dissever
the light from the Image, because the cause of vision is of necessity seen
at the same time as the visible objects. Thus fitly and consistently do we
behold the "Brightness of the glory" of God by means of the illumination
of the Spirit, and by means of the "Express Image" we are led up
to Him of whom He is the Express Image and Seal, graven to the like.(1)
CHAPTER XXVII.
Of the
origin of the word "with," and
what force it has. Also concerning the unwritten laws of the church.
65. THE
word "in "say our opponents, "is exactly appropriate
to the Spirit, and sufficient for every thought concerning Him. Why then, they
ask, have we introduced this new phrase, saying, "with the Spirit" instead
of "in the Holy Spirit," thus employing an expression which is quite
unnecessary, and sanctioned by no usage in the churches? Now it has been asserted
in the previous portion of this treatise that the word "in" has not
been specially allotted to the Holy Spirit, but is common to the Father and
the Son. It has also been, in my opinion, sufficiently demonstrated that, so
far from detracting anything from the dignity of the Spirit, it leads all,
but those whose thoughts are wholly perverted, to the sublimest height. It
remains for me to trace the origin of the word "with;" to explain
what force it has, and to shew that it is in harmony with Scripture.
66.(2)
Of the beliefs and practices whether generally accepted or publicly enjoined
which are preserved
in the
Church(1) some we possess derived from
written teaching; others we have received delivered to us "in a mystery"(1)
by the tradition of the apostles; and both of these m relation to true religion
have the same force. And these no one will gainsay;--no one, at all events,
who is even moderately versed in the institutions of the Church. For were we
to attempt to reject such customs as have no written authority, on the ground
that the importance they possess is small, we should unintentionally injure
the Gospel in its very vitals; or, rather, should make our public definition
a mere phrase and nothing more.(2) For instance, to take the first and most
general example, who is thence who has taught us in writing to sign with the
sign of the cross those who have trusted in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ?
What writing has taught us to turn to the East at the prayer? Which of the
saints has left us in writing the words of tim invocation at the displaying(3)
of the bread of the Eucharist and the cup of blessing? For we are not, as is
well known, content with what the apostle or the Gospel has recorded, but both
in preface and conclusion we add other words as being of great importance to
the validity of the ministry, and these we derive from unwritten teaching.
Moreover we bless the water of baptism and the oil of the chrism, and besides
this the catechumen who is being baptized. On what written authority do we
do this? Is not our authority silent and mystical tradition? Nay, by what written
word is the anointing of oil(1) itself taught? And whence comes the custom
of baptizing thrice?(2) And as to the other customs of baptism from what Scripture
do we derive the renunciation of Satan and his angels? Does not this come from
that unpublished and secret teaching which oar fathers guarded in a silence
out of the reach of curious meddling and inquisitive investigation? Well had
they learnt the lesson that the awful dignity of the mysteries is best preserved
by silence. What the uninitiated are not even allowed: to look at was hardly
likely to be publicly paraded about in written documents. What was the meaning
of the mighty Moses in not making all the parts of the tabernacle open to every
one? The profane he stationed without the sacred barriers; the first courts
he conceded to the purer; the Levites alone he judged worthy of being servants
of the Deity; sacrifices and burnt offerings and the rest of the priestly functions
he allotted to the priests; one chosen out of all he admitted to the shrine,
and even this one not always but on only one day in the year, and of this one
day a time was fixed for his entry so that he might gaze on the Holy of Holies
amazed at the strangeness and novelty of the sight. Moses was wise enough to
know that contempt stretches to the trite and to the obvious, while a keen
interest is naturally associated with the unusual and the unfamiliar. In the
same manner the Apostles and Fathers who laid down laws for the Church from
the beginning thus guarded the awful dignity of the mysteries in secrecy and
silence, for what is bruited abroad random among the common folk is no mystery
at all. This is the reason for our tradition of unwritten precepts and practices,
that the knowledge of our dogmas may not become neglected and contemned by
the multitude through familiarity. "Dogma" and "Kerugma" are
two distinct things; the former is observed in silence; the latter is proclaimed
to all the world. One form of this silence is the obscurity employed in Scripture,
which makes the meaning of "dogmas" difficult to be understood for
the very advantage of the reader: Thus we all look to the East(1) at our prayers,
but few of us know that we are seeking our own old country,(2) Paradise, which
God planted in Eden in the East.(3) We pray standing,(4) on the first day of
the week, but we do not all know the reason. On the day of the resurrection
(or "standing again" Grk. <greek>anastasis</greek> we
remind ourselves of the grace given to us by standing at prayer, not only because
we rose with Christ,(5) and are bound to "seek those things which are
above," (6) but because the day seems to us to be in some sense an image
of the age which we expect, wherefore, though it is the beginning of days,
it is not called by Moses first, but one.(7) For he says "There was evening,
and there was morning, one day," as though the same day often recurred.
Now "one and "eighth" are the same, in itself distinctly indicating
that really "one" and "eighth" of which the Psalmist makes
mention in certain titles of the Psalms, the state which follows after this
present time, the day which knows no waning or eventide, and no successor,
that age which endeth not or groweth old.(8) Of necessity, then, the church
teaches her own foster children to offer their prayers on that day standing,
to the end that through continual reminder of the endless life we may not neglect
to make provision for our removal thither. Moreover all Pentecost is a reminder
of the resurrection expected in the age to come. For that one and first day,
if seven times multiplied by seven, completes the seven weeks of the holy Pentecost;
for, beginning at the first, Pentecost ends with the same, making fifty revolutions
through the like intervening days. And so it is a likeness of eternity, beginning
as it does and ending, as in a circling course, at the same point. On this
day the rules of the church have educated us to prefer the upright attitude
of prayer, for by their plain reminder they, as It were, make our mind to dwell
no longer in the present but in the future. Moreover every time we fall upon
our knees and rise from off them we shew by the very deed that by our sin we
fell down to earth, and by the loving kindness of our Creator were called hack
to heaven.
67. Time
will fail me if I attempt to recount the unwritten mysteries of the Church.
Of the rest
I say nothing;
but of the very confession of our faith
in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, what is the written source? If it be granted
that, as we are baptized, so also under the obligation to believe, we make
our confession in like terms as our baptism, in accordance with the tradition
of our baptism and in conformity with the principles of true religion, let
our opponents grant us too the right to be as consistent in our ascription
of glory as in our confession of faith. If they deprecate our doxology on the
ground that it lacks written authority, let them give us the written evidence
for the confession of our faith and the other matters which we have enumerated.
While the unwritten traditions are so many, and their bearing on "the
mystery of godliness(1) is so important, can they refuse to allow us a single
word which has come down to us from the Fathers;--which we found, derived from
untutored custom, abiding in unperverted churches;--a word for which the arguments
are strong, and which contributes in no small degree to the completeness of
the force of the mystery?
68. The
force of both expressions has now been explained. I will proceed to state
once more wherein
they agree
and wherein they differ from one another;--not
that they are opposed in mutual antagonism, but that each contributes its own
meaning to true religion. The preposition "in" states the truth rather
relatively to ourselves; while "with" proclaims the fellowship of
the Spirit with God. Wherefore we use both words, by the one expressing the
dignity of the Spirit; by the other announcing the grace that is with us. Thus
we ascribe glory to God both "in" the Spirit, and "with" the
Spirit; and herein it is not our word that we use, but we follow the teaching
of the Lord as we might a fixed rule, and transfer His word to things connected
and closely related, and of which the conjunction in the mysteries is necessary.
We have deemed ourselves under a necessary obligation to combine in our confession
of the faith Him who is numbered with Them at Baptism, and we have treated
the confession of the faith as the origin and parent of the doxology. What,
then, is to be done? They must now instruct us either not to baptize as we
have received, or not to believe as we were baptized, or not to ascribe glory
as we have believed. Let any man prove if he can that the relation of sequence
in these acts is not necessary and unbroken; or let any man deny if he can
that innovation here must mean ruin everywhere. Yet they never stop dinning
in our ears that the ascription of glory "with" the Holy Spirit is
unauthorized and unscriptural and the like. We have stated that so far as the
sense goes it is the same to say "glory be to the Father and to the Son
and to the Holy Ghost," and glory be to the Father and to the Son with
the Holy Ghost." It is impossible for any one to reject or cancel the
syllable "and," which is derived from the very words of our Lord,
and there is nothing to hinder the acceptance of its equivalent. What amount
of difference and similarity there is between the two we have already shewn.
And our argument is confirmed by the fact that the Apostle uses either word
indifferently,--saying at one time "in the name of the Lord Jesus and
by the Spirit of our God;"(1) at another "when ye are gathered together,
and my Spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus,"(2) with no idea that
it makes any difference to the connexion of the names whether he use the conjunction
or the preposition.
CHAPTER XXVIII.
That our opponents refuse to concede in the case of the Spirit the terms which
Scripture uses in the case of men, as reigning together with Christ.
69. BUT
let us see if we can bethink us of any defence of this usage of our fathers;
for they who
first originated
the expression are more open to blame
than we ourselves. Paul in his Letter to the Colossians says, "And you,
being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision ... hath He quickened together
with"(3) Christ. Did then God give to a whole people and to the Church
the boon of the life with Christ, and yet the life with Christ does not belong
to the Holy Spirit? But if this is impious even to think of, is it not rightly
reverent so to make our confession, as They are by nature in close conjunction?
Furthermore what boundless lack of sensibility does it not shew in these men
to confess that the Saints are with Christ,(if, as we know is the case, Paul,
on becoming absent from the body, is present with the Lord,(1) and, after departing,
is with Christ(2)) and, so far as lies in their power, to refuse to allow to
the Spirit to be with Christ even to the same extent as men? And Paul calls
himself a "labourer together with God"(3) in the dispensation of
the Gospel; will they bring an indictment for impiety against us, if we apply
the term "fellow-labourer" to the Holy Spirit, through whom in every
creature under heaven the Gospel bringeth forth fruit?(4) The life of them
that have trusted in the Lord "is hidden," it would seem, "with
Christ in God, and when Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall" they
themselves also "appear with Him in glory;"(5) and is the Spirit
of life Himself, "Who made us free from the law of sin,"(6) not with
Christ, both in the secret and hidden life with Him, and in the manifestation
of the glory which we expect to be manifested in the saints? We are "heirs
of God and joint heirs with Christ,"(7) and is the Spirit without part
or lot in the fellowship of God and of His Christ? "The Spirit itself
beareth witness with our spirit that we are the children of God;"(8) and
are we not to allow to the Spirit even that testimony of His fellowship with
God which we have learnt from the Lord? For the height of folly is reached
if we through the faith in Christ which is in the Spirit(9) hope that we shall
be raised together with Him and sit together in heavenly places,(10) whenever
He shall change our vile body from the natural to the spiritual,(11) and yet
refuse to assign to the Spirit any share in the sitting together, or in the
glory, or anything else which we have received from Him. Of all the boons of
which, in accordance with the indefeasible grant of Him who has promised them,
we have believed ourselves worthy, are we to allow none to the Holy Spirit,
as though they were all above His dignity? It is yours according to your merit
to be "ever with the Lords" and you expect to be caught up" in
the clouds to meet the Lord in the air and to be ever with the Lord."(12)
You declare the man who numbers and ranks the Spirit with the Father and the
Son to be guilty of intolerable impiety. Can you really now deny that the Spirit
is with Christ?
70. I
am ashamed to add the rest. You expect to be glorified together with Christ;
("if so be that we suffer with him that we may be also glorified
together;"(12)) but you do not glorify the "Spirit of holiness"(1)
together with Christ, as though He were not worthy to receive equal honour
even with you. You hope to "reign with"(2) Christ; but you" do
despite unto the Spirit of grace"(3) by assigning Him the rank of a slave
and a subordinate. And I say this not to demonstrate that so much is due to
the Spirit in the ascription of glory, but to prove the unfairness of those
who will not ever give so much as this, and shrink from the fellowship of the
Spirit with Son and Father as from impiety. Who could touch on these things
without a sigh?(4) Is it not so plain as to be within the perception even of
a child that this present state of things preludes the threatened eclipse of
the faith? The undeniable has become the uncertain. We profess belief in the
Spirit, and then we quarrel with our own confessions. We are baptized, and
begin to fight again. We call upon Him as the Prince of Life, and then despise
Him as a slave like ourselves. We received Him with the Father and the Son,
and we dishonour Him as a part of creation. Those who "know not what they
ought to pray for,"(5) even though they be induced to utter a word of
the Spirit with awe, as though coming near His dignity, yet prune down all
that exceeds the exact proportion of their speech. They ought rather to bewail
their weakness, in that we are powerless to express in words our gratitude
for the benefits which we are actually receiving; for He "passes all understanding,"(8)
and convicts speech of its natural inability even to approach His dignity in
the least degree; as it is written in the Book of Wisdom,' "Exalt Him
as much as you can, for even yet will He far exceed; and when you exalt Him
put forth all your strength, and be not weary, for you can never go far enough." Verily
terrible is the account to be given for words of this kind by you who have
heard from God who cannot lie that for blasphemy against the Holy Ghost there
is no forgiveness.(8)
CHAPTER XXIX.
Enumeration
of the illustrious men in the Church who in their writings have used the
word "with."
71. Is
answer to the objection that the doxology in the form "with the
Spirit" has no written authority, we maintain that if there is no other
instance of that which is unwritten, then this must not be received. But if
the greater number of our mysteries are admitted into our constitution without
written authority, then, in company with the many others, let us receive this
one. For I hold it apostolic to abide also by the unwritten traditions. "I
praise you," it is said, "that ye remember me in all things, and
keep the ordinances as I delivered them to you;"(1) and "Hold fast
the traditions which ye have been taught whether by word, or our Epistle."(2)
One of these traditions is the practice which is now before us, which they
who ordained from the beginning, rooted firmly in the churches, delivering
it to their successors, and its use through long custom advances pace by pace
with time. If, as in a Court of Law, we were at a loss for documentary evidence,
but were able to bring before you a large number of witnesses, would you not
give your vote for our acquittal? I think so; for "at the mouth of two
or three witnesses shall the matter be established."(2) And if we could
prove clearly to you that a long period of time was in our favour, should we
not have seemed to you to urge with reason that this suit ought not to be brought
into court against us? For ancient dogmas inspire a certain sense of awe, venerable
as they are with a hoary antiquity. I will therefore give you a list of the
supporters of the word (and the time too must be taken into account in relation
to what passes unquestioned). For it did not originate with us. How could it?
We, in comparison with the time during which this word has been in vogue, are,
to use the words of Job, "but of yesterday."(4) I myself, if I must
speak of what concerns me individually, cherish this phrase as a legacy left
me by my fathers. It was delivered to me by one(5) who spent a long life in
the service of God, and by him I was both baptized, and admitted to the ministry
of the church. While examining, so far as I could, if any of the blessed men
of old used the words to which objection is now made, I found many worthy of
credit both on account of their early date, and also a characteristic in which
they are unlike the men of to-day--because of the exactness of their knowledge.
Of these some coupled the word in the doxology by the preposition, others by
the conjunction, but were in no case supposed to be acting divergently,--at
least so far as the right sense of true religion is concerned.
72. There
is the famous Irenaeus,(1) and Clement of Rome;(2) Dionysius of Rome,(3)
and, strange to
say, Dionysius
of Alexandria, in his second Letter
to his namesake, on "Conviction and Defence," so concludes. I will
give you his very words. "Following all these, we, too, since we have
received from the presbyters who were before us a form and rule, offering thanksgiving
in the same terms with them, thus conclude our Letter to you. To God the Father
and the Son our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Holy Ghost, glory and might for
ever and ever; amen." And no one can say that this passage has been altered.
He would not have so persistently stated that he had received a form and rule
if he had said "in the Spirit." For of this phrase the use is abundant:
it was the use of "with" which required defence. Dionysius moreover
in the middle of his treatise thus writes in opposition to the Sabellians, "If
by the hypostases being three they say that they are divided, there are three,
though they like it not. Else let them destroy the divine Trinity altogether." And
again: "most divine on this account after the Unity is the Trinity."(4)
Clement, in more primitive fashion, writes, "God lives, and the Lord Jesus
Christ, and the Holy Ghost."(5) And now let us bear how Irenaeus, who
lived near the times of the Apostles, mentions the Spirit in his work "Against
the Heresies."(6) "The Apostle rightly calls carnal them that are
unbridled and carried away to their own desires, having no desire for the Holy
Spirit,"(7) and in another passage Irenaeus says, "The Apostle exclaimed
that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of the heavens lest we, being
without share in the divine Spirit, fall short of the kingdom of the heavens." If
any one thinks Eusebius of Palestine(8) worthy of credit on account of his
wide experience, I point further to the very words he uses in discussing questions
concerning the polygamy of the ancients. Stirring up himself to his work, he
writes "invoking the holy God of the Prophets, the Author of light, through
our Saviour Jesus Christ, with the Holy Spirit."
73. Origen,
too, in many of his expositions of the Psalms, we find using the form of
doxology "with the Holy Ghost. The opinions which he held concerning
the Spirit were not always and everywhere sound; nevertheless in many passages
even he himself reverently recognises the force of established usage, and expresses
himself concerning the Spirit in terms consistent with true religion. It is,
if I am not mistaken, in the Sixth(1) Book of his Commentary on the Gospel
of St. John that he distinctly makes the Spirit an object of worship. His words
are:--"The washing or water is a symbol of the cleaning of the soul which
is washed clean of all filth that comes of wickedness;(2) but none the less
is it also by itself, to him who yields himself to the God-head of the adorable
Trinity, through the power of the invocations, the origin and source of blessings." And
again, in his Exposition of the Epistle to the Romans "the holy powers," he
says "are able to receive the Only-begotten, and the Godhead of the Holy
Spirit." Thus I apprehend, the powerful influence of tradition frequently
impels men to express themselves in terms contradictory to their own opinions.(3)
Moreover this form of the doxology was not unknown even to Africanus the historian.
In the Fifth Book of his Epitome of the Times he says "we who know the
weight of those terms, and are not ignorant of the grace of faith, render thanks
to the Father, who bestowed on us His own creatures, Jesus Christ, the Saviour
of the world and our Lord, to whom be glory and majesty with the Holy Ghost,
for ever."(1) The rest of the passages may peradventure be viewed with
suspicion; or may really have been altered, and the fact of their having been
tampered with will be difficult to detect because the difference consists in
a single syllable. Those however which I have quoted at length are out of the
reach of any dishonest manipulation, and can easily be verified from the actual
works.
I will
now adduce another piece of evidence which might perhaps seem insignificant,
but because of
its antiquity
must in nowise be omitted by a defendant who is
indicted on a charge of innovation. It seemed fitting to our fathers not to
receive the gift of the light at eventide in silence, but, on its appearing,
immediately to give thanks. Who was the author of these words of thanksgiving
at the lighting of the lamps, we are not able to say. The people, however,
utter the ancient form, and no one has ever reckoned guilty of impiety those
who say "We praise Father, Son, and God's Holy Spirit."(2) And if
any one knows the Hymn of Athenogenes,(3) which, as he was hurrying on to his
perfecting by fire, he left as a kind of farewell gift(4) to his friends, he
knows the mind of the martyrs as to the Spirit. On this head I shall say no
more.
74. But
where shall I rank the great Gregory,(5) and the words uttered by him? Shall
we not place
among
Apostles and Prophets a man who walked by the
same Spirit as they;(1) who never through all his days diverged from the footprints
of the saints; who maintained, as long as he lived, the exact principles of
evangelical citizenship? I am sure that we shall do the truth a wrong if we
refuse to number that soul with the people of God, shining as it did like a
beacon in the Church of God; for by the fellow-working of the Spirit the power
which he had over demons was tremendous, and so gifted was he with the grace
of the word "for obedience to the faith among ... the nations,"(2)
that, although only seventeen Christians were handed over to him, he brought
the whole people alike in town and country through knowledge to God. He too
by Christ's mighty name commanded even rivers to change their course,(3) and
caused a lake, which afforded a ground of quarrel to some covetous brethren,
to dry up.(4) Moreover his predictions of things to come were such as in no
wise to fall short of those of the great prophets. To recount all his wonderful
works in detail would be too long a task. By the superabundance of gifts, wrought
in him by the Spirit in all power and in signs and in marvels, he was styled
a second Moses by the very enemies of the Church. Thus in all that he through
grace accomplished, alike byword and deed, a light seemed ever to be shining,
token of the heavenly power from the unseen which followed him. To this day
he is a great object of admiration to the people of his own neighbourhood,
and his memory, established in the churches ever fresh and green, is not dulled
by length of time. Thus not a practice, not a word, not a mystic rite has been
added to the Church besides what he bequeathed to it. Hence truly on account
of the antiquity of their institution many of their ceremonies appear to be
defective.(5) For his successors in the administration of the Churches could
not endure to accept any subsequent discovery in addition to what had had his
sanction. Now one of the institutions of Gregory is the very form of the doxology
to which objection is now made, preserved by the Church on the authority of
his tradition; a statement which may be verified without much trouble by any
one who likes to make a short journey. That our Firmilian held this belief
is testified by the writings which he has left.(6) The contemporaries also
of the illustrious Meletius say that he was of this opinion. But why quote
ancient authorities? Now in the East are not the maintainers of true religion
known chiefly by this one term, and separated from their adversaries as by
a watchword? I have heard from a certain Mesopotamian, a man at once well skilled
in the language and of unperverted opinions, that by the usage of his country
it is impossible for any one, even though he may wish to do so, to express
himself in any other way, and that they are compelled by the idiom of their
mother tongue to offer the doxology by the syllable "and," or, I
should more accurately say, by their equivalent expressions. We Cappadocians,
too, so speak in the dialect of our country, the Spirit having so early. as
the division of tongues foreseen the utility of the phrase. And what of the
whole West, almost from Illyricum to the boundaries of our world? Does it not
support this word?
75. How
then can I be an innovator and creator of new terms, when I adduce as originators
and champions
of the
word whole nations, cities, custom going
back beyond the memory of man, men who were pillars of the church and conspicuous
for all knowledge and spiritual power? For this cause this banded array of
foes is set in motion against me, and town and village and remotest regions
are full of my calumniators. Sad and painful are these things to them that
seek for peace, but great is the reward of patience for sufferings endured
for the Faith's sake. So besides these let sword flash, let axe be whetted,
let fire burn fiercer than that of Babylon, let every instrument of torture
be set in motion against me. To me nothing is more fearful than failure to
fear the threats which the Lord has directed against them that blaspheme the
Spirit.(1) Kindly readers will find a satisfactory defence in what I have said,
that I accept a phrase so dear and so familiar to the saints, and confirmed
by usage so long, inasmuch as, from the day when the Gospel was first preached
up to our own time, it is shewn to have been admitted to all full rights within
the churches, and, what is of greatest moment, to have been accepted as bearing
a sense in accordance with holiness and true religion. But before the great
tribunal what have I prepared to say in my defence? This; that I was in the
first place led to the glory of the Spirit by the honour conferred by the Lord
in associating Him with Himself and with His Father at baptism;(1) and secondly
by the introduction of each of us to the knowledge of God by such an initiation;
and above all by the fear of the threatened punishment shutting out the thought
of all indignity and unworthy conception. But our opponents, what will they
say? After shewing neither reverence for the Lord's honour(2) nor fear of His
threats, what kind of defence will they have for their blasphemy? It is for
them to make up their mind about their own action or even now to change it.
For my own part I would pray most earnestly that the good God will make His
peace rule in the hearts of all,(3) so that these men who are swollen with
pride and set in battle array against us may be calmed by the Spirit of meekness
and of love; and that if they have become utterly savage, and are in an untamable
state, He will grant to us at least to bear with long suffering all that we
have to bear at their hands. In short "to them that have in themselves
the sentence of death,"(4) it is not suffering for the sake of the Faith
which is painful; what is hard to bear is to fail to fight its battle. The
athlete does not so much complain of being wounded in the struggle as of not
being able even to secure admission into the stadium. Or perhaps this was the
time for silence spoken of by Solomon the wise.(5) For, when life is buffeted
by so fierce a storm that all the intelligence of those who are instructed
in the word is filled with the deceit of false reasoning and confounded, like
an eye filled with dust, when men are stunned by strange and awful noises,
when all the world is shaken and everything tottering to its fall, what profits
it to cry, as I am really crying, to the wind?
CHAPTER XXX.
Exposition of the present state of the Churches.
76. To what then shall I liken our present condition? It may be compared,
I think, to some naval battle which has arisen out of time old quarrels, and
is fought by men who cherish a deadly hate against one another, of long experience
in naval warfare, and eager for the fight. Look, I beg you, at the picture
thus raised before your eyes. See the rival fleets rushing in dread array to
the attack. With a burst of uncontrollable fury they engage and fight it out.
Fancy, if you like, the ships driven to and fro by a raging tempest, while
thick darkness falls from the clouds and blackens all the scenes so that watchwords
are indistinguishable in the confusion, and all distinction between friend
and foe is lost. To fill up the details of the imaginary picture, suppose the
sea swollen with billows and whirled up from the deep, while a vehement torrent
of rain pours down from the clouds and the terrible waves rise high. From every
quarter of heaven the winds beat upon one point, where both the fleets are
dashed one against the other. Of the combatants some are turning traitors;
some are deserting in the very thick of the fight; some have at one and the
same moment to urge on their boats, all beaten by the gale, and to advance
against their assailants. Jealousy of authority and the lust of individual
mastery splits the sailors into parties which deal mutual death to one another.
Think, besides all this, of the confused and unmeaning roar sounding over all
the sea, from howling winds, from crashing vessels, from boiling surf, from
the yells of the combatants as they express their varying emotions in every
kind of noise, so that not a word from admiral or pilot can be heard. The disorder
and confusion is tremendous, for the extremity of misfortune, when life is
despaired of, gives men license for every kind of wickedness. Suppose, too,
that the men are all smitten with the incurable plague of mad love of glory,
so that they do not cease from their struggle each to get the better of the
other, while their ship is actually settling down into the deep.
77. Turn
now I beg you from this figurative description to the unhappy reality. Did
it not at one
time(1)
appear that the Arian schism, after its separation
into a sect opposed to the Church of God, stood itself alone in hostile array?
But when the attitude of our foes against us was changed from one of long standing
and bitter strife to one of open warfare, then, as is well known, the war was
split up in more ways than I can tell into many subdivisions, so that all men
were stirred to a state of inveterate hatred alike by common party spirit and
individual suspicion.(2) But what storm at sea was ever so fierce and wild
as this tempest of the Churches? In it every landmark of the Fathers has been
moved; every foundation. every bulwark of opinion has been shaken: everything
buoyed up on the unsound is dashed about and shaken down. We attack one another.
We are overthrown by one another. If our enemy is not the first to strike us,
we are wounded by the comrade at our side. If a foeman is stricken and falls,
his fellow soldier tramples him down. There is at least this bond of union
between us that we hate our common foes, but no sooner have the enemy gone
by than we find enemies in one another. And who could make a complete list
of all the wrecks? Some have gone to the bottom on the attack of the enemy,
some through the unsuspected treachery, of their allies, some from the blundering
of their own officers. We see, as it were, whole churches, crews and all, dashed
and shattered upon the sunken reefs of disingenuous heresy, while others of
the enemies of the Spirit(1) of Salvation have seized the helm and made shipwreck
of the faith.(2) And then the disturbances wrought by the princes of the world(3)
have caused the downfall of the people with a violence unmatched by that of
hurricane or whirlwind. The luminaries of the world, which God set to give
light to the souls of the people, have been driven from their homes, and a
darkness verily gloomy and disheartening has settled on the Churches.(1) The
terror of universal ruin is already imminent, and yet their mutual rivalry
is so unbounded as to blunt all sense of danger. Individual hatred is of more
importance than the general and common warfare, for men by whom the immediate
gratification of ambition is esteemed more highly than the rewards that await
us in a time to come, prefer the glory of getting the better of their opponents
to securing the common welfare of mankind. So all men alike, each as best he
can, lift the hand of murder against one another. Harsh rises the cry of the
combatants encountering one another in dispute; already all the Church is almost
full of the inarticulate screams, the unintelligible noises, rising from the
ceaseless agitations that divert the right rule of the doctrine of true religion,
now in the direction of excess, now in that of defect. On the one hand are
they who confound the Persons and are carried away into Judaism;(2) on the
other hand are they that, through the opposition of the natures, pass into
heathenism.(3) Between these opposite parties inspired Scripture is powerless
to mediate; the traditions of the apostles cannot suggest terms of arbitration.
Plain speaking is fatal to friendship, and disagreement in opinion all the
ground that is wanted for a quarrel. No oaths of confederacy are so efficacious
in keeping men true to sedition as their likeness in error. Every one is a
theologue though he have his soul branded with more spots than can be counted.
The result is that innovators find a plentiful supply of men ripe for faction,
while self-appointed scions of the house of place-hunters(4) reject the government(5)
of the Holy Spirit and divide the chief dignities of the Churches. The institutions
of the Gospel have now everywhere been thrown into confusion by want of discipline;
there is an indescribable pushing for the chief places while every self-advertisertries
to force himself into high office. The result of this lust for ordering is
that our people are in a state of wild confusion for lack of being ordered;(1)
the exhortations of those in authority are rendered wholly purposeless and
void, because there is not a man but, out of his ignorant impudence, thinks
that it is just as much his duty to give orders to other people, as it is to
obey any one else.
78. So,
since no human voice is strong enough to be heard in such a disturbance,
I reckon silence
more profitable
than speech, for if there is any truth in
the words of the Preacher, "The words of wise men are heard in quiet,"(2)
in the present condition of things any discussion of them must be anything
but becoming. I am moreover restrained by the Prophet's saying, "Therefore
the prudent shall keep silence in that time, for it is an evil time,"(3)
a time when some trip up their neighbours' heels, some stamp on a man when
he is down, and others clap their hands with joy, but there is not one to feel
for the fallen and hold out a helping hand, although according to the ancient
law he is not uncondemned, who passes by even his enemy's beast of burden fallen
under his load.(4) This is not the state of things now. Why not? The love of
many has waxed cold;(5) brotherly concord is destroyed, the very name of unity
is ignored, brotherly admonitions are heard no more, nowhere is there Christian
pity, nowhere falls the tear of sympathy. Now there is no one to receive "the
weak in faith,"(6) but mutual hatred has blazed so high among fellow clansmen
that they are more delighted at a neighbour's fall than at their own success.
Just as in a plague, men of the most regular lives suffer from the same sickness
as the rest, because they catch the disease by communication with the infected,
so nowadays by the evil rivalry which possesses our souls we are carried away
to an emulation in wickedness, and are all of us each as bad as the others.
Hence merciless and sour sit the judges of the erring; unfeeling and hostile
are the critics of the well disposed. And to such a depth is this evil rooted
among us that we have become more brutish than the brutes; they do at least
herd with their fellows, but our most savage warfare is with our own people.
79. For
all these reasons I ought to have kept silence, but I was drawn in the other
direction by love,
which "seeketh not her own,"(1) and
desires to overcome every difficulty put in her way by time and circumstance.
I was taught too by the children at Babylon,(2) that, when there is no one
to sopport the cause of true religion, we ought alone and all unaided to do
our duty. They from out of the midst of the flame lifted up their voices in
hymns and praise to God, reeking not of the host that set the truth at naught,
but sufficient, three only that they were, with one another. Wherefore we too
are undismayed at the cloud of our enemies, and, resting our hope on the aid
of the Spirit, have, with all boldness, proclaimed the truth. Had I not so
done, it would truly have been terrible that the blasphemers of the Spirit
should so easily be emboldened in their attack upon true religion, and that
we, with so mighty an ally and supporter at our side, should shrink from the
service of that doctrine, which by the tradition of the Fathers has been preserved
by an unbroken sequence of memory to our own day. A further powerful incentive
to my undertaking was the warm fervour of your "love unfeigned,"(3)
a and the seriousness and taciturnity of your disposition; a guarantee that
you would not publish what I was about to say to all the world,--not because
it would not be worth making known, but to avoid casting pearls before swine,(4)
My task is now done. If you find what I have said satisfactory, let this make
an end to our discussion of these matters. If you think any point requires
further elucidation, pray do not hesitate to pursue the investigation with
all diligence, and to add to your information by putting any uncontroversial
question. Either through me or through others the Lord will grant full explanation
on matters which have yet to be made clear, according to the knowledge supplied
to the worthy by the Holy Spirit. Amen.
Return to Volume 31 Index