Subscribe
to CF
Be
first to know
Read our AAA review
from Catholic Culture
Our Mission
To
bring Jesus Christ; the Way, the Truth and the Life; to all who will follow,
according to scripture and tradition, per the Magisterium
of the Roman Catholic Church.
While you visit!
Listen
to
Radio
For the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. |
HOMILIES OF
ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM
ON THE GOSPEL
ACCORDING TO ST. JOHN
HOMILIES LVI TO LXI (JOHN 9 & 10)
HOMILY LVI.
JOHN ix. 1, 2.
"And
as Jesus passed by, He saw a man which was blind from his birth. And His
disciples asked
Him, saying,
Master, who did sin, this man, or his
parents, that he was born blind?"
[1.] "And as Jesus passed by, He saw a man which was blind from his birth." Being
full of love for man, and caring for our salvation, and desiring to stop the
mouths of the foolish, He omitteth nothing of His own part, though there be
none to give heed. And the Prophet knowing this saith, "That Thou mightest
be justified when Thou speakest, and be clear when Thou art judged." (Ps.
li. 4.) Wherefore here, when they would not receive His sublime sayings, but
said that He had a devil, and attempted to kill Him, He went forth from the
Temple, and healed the blind, mitigating their rage by His absence, and by
working the miracle softening their hardness and cruelty, and establishing
His assertions. And He worketh a miracle which was no common one, but one which
took place then for the first time. "Since the world began," saith
he who was healed, "was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one
that was born blind." (Ver. 32.) Some have, perhaps, opened the eyes of
the blind, but of one born blind never. And that on going out of the Temple,
He proceeded intentionally to the work, is clear from this; it was He who saw
the blind man, not the blind man who came to Him; and so earnestly did He look
upon him, that even His disciples perceived it. From this, at least, they came
to question Him; for when they saw Him earnestly regarding the man, they asked
Him, saying, "Who did sin, this man, or his parents?" A mistaken
question, for how could he sin before he was born? and how, if his parents
had sinned, would he have been punished? Whence then came they to put this
question? Before, when He healed the paralytic, He said, "Behold, thou
art made whole, sin no more." (c. v. 14.) They therefore, having understood
that he was palsied on account of sin, said," Well, that other was palsied
because of his sins; but concerning. this man, what wouldest Thou say? hath
he sinned? It is not possible to say so, for he is blind from his birth. Have
his parents sinned? Neither can one say this, for the child suffers not punishment
for the father." As therefore when we see a child evil entreated, we exclaim, "What
can one say of this? what has the child done?" not as asking a question,
but as being perplexed, so the disciples spake here, not so much asking for
information, as being in perplexity. What then saith Christ?
Ver. 3. "Neither
hath this man sinned, nor his parents."
This He
saith not as acquitting them of sins, for He saith not simply, "Neither
hath this man sinned, nor his parents," but addeth, "that he should
have been born blind(1)--but that the Son of God should be glorified in him." "For
both this man hath sinned and his parents, but 'his blindness proceedeth not
from that." And this He said, not signifying that though this man indeed
was not in such case, yet that others had been made blind from such a cause,
the sins of their parents, since it cannot be that when one sinneth another
should be punished. For if we allow this, we must also allow that he sinned
before his birth. As therefore when He declared, "neither hath this man
sinned," He said not that it is possible to sin from one's very birth,
and be punished for it; so when He said, "nor his parents," He said
not that one may be punished for his parents' sake. This supposition He removeth
by the mouth of Ezekiel; "As I live saith the Lord, this proverb shall
not be, that is used, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's
teeth are set on edge." (Ezek. xviii. 3, 2.) And Moses saith, "The
father shall not die for the child, neither shall the child die for the father." (Deut.
xxiv. 16.) And of a certain king(1) Scripture saith, that for this very reason
he did not this thing,(2) observing the law of Moses. But if any one argue, "How
then is it said, 'Who visiteth the sins of the parents upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation'?" (Deut. v. 9); we should make this answer,
that the assertion is not universal, but that it is spoken with reference to
certain who came out of Egypt. And its meaning is of this kind; "Since
these who have come out of Egypt, after signs and wonders, have become worse
than their forefathers who saw none of these things, they shall suffer," It
saith, "the same that those others suffered, since they have dared the
same crimes." And that it was spoken of those men, any one who will give
attention to the passage will more certainly know. Wherefore then was he born
blind?
"That the glory(3) of God should be made manifest,"(4)
He saith.
Lo, here
again is another difficulty, if without this man's punishment, it was not
possible that the
glory of God
should be shown. Certainly it is not
said that it was impossible, for it was possible, but, "that it might
be manifested even in this man." "What," saith some one, "did
he suffer wrong for the glory of God?" What wrong, tell me? For what if
God had never willed to produce him at all? But I assert that he even received
benefit from his blindness: since he recovered the sight of the eyes within.
What were the Jews profited by their eyes? They incurred the heavier punishment,
being blinded even while they saw. And what injury had this man by his blindness?
For by means of it he recovered sight. As then the evils of the present life
are not evils, so neither are the good things good; sin alone is an evil, but
blindness is not an evil. And He who had brought this man from not being into
being, had also power to leave him as he was.
[2.] But
some say, that this conjunction(5) is not at all expressive of cause, but
relates to the
consequence of the
miracle; as when He saith, "For
judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see, and
that they which see might be made blind" (ver. 39); and yet it was not
for this He came, that those who saw might be made blind. And again Paul, "Because
that which may be known of God is manifested in them, that they may be without
excuse" (Rom. i. 19, 20); yet He showed it not unto them for this, that
they might be deprived of excuse, but that they might obtain excuse. And again
in another place, "The Law entered, that the offense might abound" (Rom.
v. 20); yet it was not for this that it entered, but that sin might be checked.
Seest thou everywhere that the conjunction relates to the consequence? For
as some excellent architect may build part of a house, and leave the rest unfinished,
so that to those who believe not he may prove, by means of that remnant, that
he is author of the whole; so also God joineth together and completeth our
body, as it were a house decayed, healing the withered hand, bracing the palsied
limbs, straightening the lame, cleansing the lepers, raising up the sick, making
sound the crippled, recalling the dead from death, opening the eyes that were
closed, or adding them where before they were not; all which things, being
blemishes(6) arising from the infirmity of our nature, He by correcting showed
His power.
But when
He said, "That the glory of God might be manifested," He
spake of Himself, not of the Father; His(7) glory was already manifest. For
since they had heard that God made man, taking the dust of the earth, so also
Christ made clay. To have said, "I am He who took the dust of the earth,
and made man," would have seemed a hard thing to His hearers; but this
when shown by actual working, no longer stood in their way. So that He by taking
earth, and mixing it with spittle, showed forth His hidden glory; for no small
glory was it that He should be deemed the Architect of the creation.
And after
this the rest also followed; from the part, the whole was proved, since the
belief of the
greater also
confirmed the less. For man is more honorable
than any created thing, and of our members the most honorable is the eye. This
is the cause that He fashioned the eyes, not in a common manner, but in the
way that He did. For though that member be small in size, yet it is more necessary
than any part of the body. And this Paul showed when he said, "If the
ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore
not of the body?" (1 Cor. xii. 16.) For all indeed that is in us is a
manifestation of the wisdom of God, but much more the eye; this it is that
guides the whole body, this gives beauty to it all, this adorns the countenance,
this is the light of all the limbs. What the sun is in the world, that the
eye is in the body; quench the sun, and you destroy and confound all things;
quench the eyes, and the feet, the hands, the soul, are useless. When these
are disabled, even knowledge is gone, since by means of these we know God. "For
the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made." (Rom. i. 20.) Wherefore
the eye is not only a light to the body, but beyond the body to the soul also.
On which account it is established as in a royal fortress, obtaining the higher
condition, and presiding over the other senses. This then Christ forms.
And that
thou mayest not deem that He needeth matter when He worketh, and that thou
mayest learn that
He had
not need at all of clay, (for He who brought
into being the greater existences when as yet they were not, would much more
have made this without matter,) that I say thou mayest learn that He did not
this through necessity, but to show that He was the Creator at the beginning,
when He had spread on the clay He saith, "Go, wash," "that thou
mayest know that I need not clay to create eyes, but that My glory may be manifested
hereby." For to show that He spake of Himself when He said, "That
the glory of God may be manifested," He added,
Ver. 4. "I
must work the works of Him that sent Me."
That is, "I must manifest Myself, and do the things which may show that
I do the same things with the Father"; not things "similar," but, "the
same," an expression which marks greater unvaryingness, and which is used
of those who do not differ ever so little. Who then after this will face Him,
when he seeth that He hath the same power with the Father? For not only did
He form or open eyes, but gave also the gift of sight, which is a proof that
He also breathed in the soul. Since if that did not work, the eye, though perfected,
could never see anything; so that He gave both the energy(1) which is from
the soul, and gave the member also possessing all things, both arteries and
nerves and veins, and all things of which our body is composed. "I must
work while it is day."
What mean
these words? To what conclusion do they lead? To an important one. For what
He saith is
of this
kind. "While it is day, while men may believe
on Me, while this life lasteth, I must work."
"The night cometh," that is, futurity, "when
no man can work."
He said
not, "when I cannot work," but, "when no man can work":
that is, when there is no longer faith, nor labors, nor repentance. For to
show that He calleth faith, a "work," when they say unto Him, "What
shall we do, that we might work the works of God?" (c. vi. 28), He replieth, "This
is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent." How then
can no man work this work in the future world?(2) Because there faith is not,
but all, willingly, or unwillingly, will submit. For lest any one should say
that He acted as He did from desire of honor, He showeth that He did all to
spare them who had power to believe "here" only, but who could no
longer "there" gain any good thing. On this account, though the blind
man came not to Him, He did what He did: for that the man was worthy to be
healed, that had he seen he would have believed and come to Christ, that had
he heard from any that He was present, he would not even so have been neglectful,
is clear from what follows, from his courage, from his very faith. For it was
likely that he would have considered with himself, and have said, "What
is this? He made clay, and anointed my eyes, and said to me,' Go, wash;' could
he not have healed me, and then have sent me to Siloam? Often have I washed
there with many others, and have gained no good; had he possessed any power,
he would while present have healed me." Just as Naaman spake respecting
Elisha; for he too being commanded to go wash in Jordan, believed not, and
this too when there was such a fame abroad concerning Elisha. (2 Kings v. 11.)
But the blind man neither disbelieved, nor contradicted, nor reasoned with
himself, "What is this? Ought he to have put on clay? This is rather to
blind one the more: who ever recovered sight so ?" But he used no such
reasonings. Seest thou his steadfast faith and zeal?
"The night cometh." Next He showeth, that even after the Crucifixion
He would care for the ungodly, and bring many to Himself. For "it is yet
day." But after that, He entirely cutteth them off, and declaring this,
He saith,
Ver. 5. "As
long as I am in the world, I am the Light of the world."
[3.] As
also He said to others, "Believe while the light is with you."(3)
(c. xii. 36.) Wherefore then did Paul call this life "night" and
that other "day"? Not opposing Christ, but saying the same thing,
if not in words yet in sense; for he also saith, "The night is far spent,
the day is at hand." (Rom. xiii. 12.) The present time he calleth "night," because
of those who sit in darkness, or because he compareth it with that day which
is to come, Christ calleth the future "night," because there sin
has no power to work;(4) but Paul calleth the present life night, because they
are in darkness who continue in wickedness and unbelief. Addressing himself
then to the faithful he said, "The night is far spent, the day is at hand," since
they should enjoy that light; and he calleth the old life night. "Let
us put away," he saith, "the works of darkness." Seest thou
that he telleth them that it is "night"? wherefore he saith, "Let
us walk honestly as in the day," that we may enjoy that light. For if
this light be so good, consider what that will be; as much as the sunlight
is brighter than the flame of a candle, so much and far more is that light
better than this. And signifying this, Christ saith, that "the sun shall
be darkened." Because of the excess of that brightness, not even the sun
shall be seen.
If now
in order to have here well-lighted and airy houses, we expend immense sums,
building and toiling,
consider how
we ought to spend our very bodies
themselves, that glorious houses may be built for us in the heavens where is
that Light ineffable. Here there are strifes and contentions about boundaries
and walls, but there will be nothing of the kind there, no envy, no malice,
no one will dispute with us about settling boundaries. This dwelling too we
assuredly needs must leave, but that abideth with us forever; this must decay
by time, and be exposed to innumerable injuries, but that must remain without
growing old perpetually; this a poor man cannot build, but that other one may
build with two mites, as did the widow. Wherefore I choke with grief, that
when so many blessings are laid before us, we are slothful, and despise them;
we use every exertion to have splendid houses here, but how to gain in heaven
so much as a little resting-place, we care not, we think not. For tell me,
where wouldest thou have thy dwelling here? In the wilderness, or in one of
the smaller cities? I think not; but in some of the most royal and grand cities,
where the traffic is more, where the splendor is greater. But I will lead thee
into such a City, whose Builder and Maker is God; there I exhort thee to found
and build, at less cost [with less labor(1)]. That house the hands of the poor
build, and it is most truly "building," just as the structures made
here are the work of extreme folly. For if a man were to bring you into the
land of Persia, to behold what is there and to return, and were then to bid
you build houses there, would you not condemn him for excessive folly, as bidding
you spend unseasonably? How then dost thou this very same thing upon the earth
which thou shall shortly leave? "But I shall leave it to my children," saith
some one. Yet they too shall leave it soon after thee; nay, often even before
thee; and their successors the same. And even here it is a subject of melancholy
to thee that thou seest not thine heirs retain their possessions, but there
thou needest apprehend nothing of the sort; the possession remaineth immovable,
to thee, to thy children, and to their descendants, if they imitate the same
goodness. That building Christ taketh in hand, he who buildeth that needs not
to appoint care-takers, nor be thoughtful, nor anxious; for when God hath undertaken
the work, what need of thought? He bringeth all things together, and raiseth
the house. Nor is this the only thing wonderful, but also that He so buildeth
it as is pleasing to thee, or rather even beyond what is pleasing, beyond what
thou desirest; for He is the most excellent Artist, and careth greatly for
thy advantage. If thou art poor, and desirest to build this house, it brings
thee no envy, produces against thee no malice, for none of those who know how
to envy behold it, but the Angels who know how to rejoice at thy blessings;
none will be able to encroach upon it, for none dwell near it of those who
are diseased with such passions. For neighbors thou hast there the saints,
Peter and Paul with their company, all the Prophets, the Martyrs, the multitude(2)
of Angels, of Archangels. For the sake then of all these things,(3) let us
empty our substance upon the poor, that we may obtain those tabernacles;(4)
which may we all obtain through the grace and lovingkindness of our Lord Jesus
Christ, by whom and with whom to the Father and the Holy Ghost be glory, now
and ever and world without end. Amen.
HOMILY LVII.
JOHN ix. 6, 7.
"When
Jesus had thus spoken, He spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle,
and He anointed
the
eyes of the blind man with the clay, and said,
Go, wash in the pool of Siloam."
[1.] Those
who intend to gain any advantage from what they read, must not pass by even
any small
portion of
the words; and on this account we are bidden
to "search" the Scriptures, because most of the words, although at
first sight(1) easy, appear to have in their depth much hidden meaning. For
observe of what sort is the present case. "Having said these words," It
saith," He spat on the ground." What words? "That the glory
of God should be made manifest," and that, "I must work the works
of Him that sent Me." For not without a cause hath the Evangelist mentioned
to us His words, and added that, "He spat," but to show that He confirmed
His words by deeds. And why used He not water instead of spittle for the clay?
He was about to send the man to Siloam: in order therefore that nothing might
be ascribed to the fountain, but that thou mightest learn that the power proceeding
from His mouth, the same both formed and opened the man's eyes, He "spat
on the ground"; this at least the Evangelist signified, when he said, "And
made clay of the spittle." Then, that the successful issue might not seem
to be of the earth, He bade him wash. But wherefore did He not this at once,
instead of sending him to Siloam? That thou mayest learn the faith of the blind
man, and that the obstinacy of the Jews might be silenced: for it was probable
that they would all see him as he departed, having the clay spread upon his
eyes, since by the strangeness of the thing he would attract to himself all,
both those who did and those who did not know him, and they would observe him
exactly. And because it is not easy to recognize a blind man who hath recovered
sight, He first maketh by the length of way many to be witnesses, and by the
strangeness of the spectacle exact observers, that being more attentive they
may no longer be able to say, "It is he: it is not he." Moreover,
by sending him to Siloam, He desireth to prove that He is not estranged from
the Law and the Old (Covenant), nor could it afterwards be feared that Siloam
would receive the glory, since many who had often washed their eyes there gained
no such benefit; for there also it was the power of Christ that wrought all.
On which account the Evangelist addeth for us the interpretation of the name;
for having said, "in Siloam," he addeth,
"Which
is,(2) Sent."
That thou
mayest learn that there also it was Christ who healed him. As Paul saith, "They drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that
Rock was Christ." (1 Cor. x. 4.) As then Christ was the spiritual Rock,
so also was He the spiritual Siloam. To me also the sudden(3) coming in of
the water seems to hint an ineffable mystery. What is that? The unlooked for
(nature) of His appearance, beyond all expectation.
But observe
the mind of the blind man, obedient in everything. He said not, "If
it is really the clay or the spittle which gives me eyes, what need of Siloam?
Or if there be need of Siloam, what need of the clay? Why did he anoint me?
Why bid me wash?" But he entertained no such thoughts, he held himself
prepared for one thing only, to obey in all things Him who gave the command,
and nothing that was done offended him. If any one ask, "How then did
he recover his sight, when he had removed the clay?" he will hear no other
answer from us than that we know not the manner. And what wonder if we know
it not, since not even the Evangelist knew, nor the very man that was healed?
What had been done he knew, but the manner of doing it he could not comprehend.
So when he was asked he said, that "He put clay upon mine eyes, and I
washed, and do see"; but how this took place he cannot tell them, though
they ask ten thousand times.
Ver. 8,
9. "The neighbors
therefore, and they which(4) had seen him, that he was a beggar,(6) said,
Is not this he that sat and begged? Some said,
This is he."
The strangeness
of what had been brought to pass led them even to unbelief, though so much
had been
contrived(6)
that they might not disbelieve. They said, "Is
not this he that sat and begged?" O the lovingkindness of God! Whither
did He descend, when with great kindness He healed even beggars, and so silenced
the Jews, because He deemed not the illustrious, nor the distinguished, nor
the rulers, but men of no mark to be fit objects of the same Providence. For
He came for the salvation of all.
And what happened in the case of the paralytic, happened also with this man,
for neither did the one or the other know who it was that healed him. And this
was caused by the retirement of Christ, for Jesus when He healed always retired,
that all suspicion might be removed from the miracles. Since how could they
who knew not who He was flatter Him, or join in contriving what had been done?
Neither was this man one of those who went about, but of those who sat at the
doors of the Temple. Now when all were doubting concerning him,what saith he?
"I
am he."
He was not ashamed of his former blindness, nor did he fear the wrath of the
people, nor did he decline showing himself that he might proclaim his Benefactor.
Ver. 10,
11. "They
said unto him, How were thine eyes opened? He answered and said, A man that
is called
Jesus."
What sayest
thou? Doth "a man" work
such deeds? As yet he knew nothing great concerning Him.
"A
man that is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes."
[2.] Observe how truthful he is. He saith not whence He made it, for he speaks
not of what he doth not know; he saw not that He spat on the ground, but that
He spread it on he knew from sense and touch.
"And
said unto me, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam."
This too his hearing witnessed to him. But how did he recognize His voice?
From His conversation with the disciples. And saying all this, and having received
the witness by the works, the manner (of the cure) he cannot tell. Now if faith
is needed in matters which are felt and handled, much more in the case of things
invisible.
Ver. 12. "They
said unto him, Where is he? He said, I know not."
They said, "Where is he?" having already murderous intentions against
Him. But observe the modesty(1) of Christ, how He continued not with those
who were healed; because He neither desired to reap glory, nor to draw a multitude,
nor to make a show of Himself. Observe too how truthfully the blind man maketh
all his answers. The Jews desired to find Christ to bring Him to the priests,
but when they did not find Him, they brought the blind man to the Pharisees,
as to those who would question him more severely. For which reason the Evangelist
remarks, that it was "the Sabbath" (ver. 14), in order to point out
their wicked thoughts, and the cause for which they sought Him, as though forsooth
they had found a handle, and could disparage the miracle by means of what appeared
to be a transgression of the Law. And this is clear from their saying immediately
on seeing him nothing but, "How opened he thine eyes?"(2) Observe
also the manner of their speech; they say not, "How didst thou receive
thy sight?" but, "How opened he thine eyes?" thus affording
him an excuse for slandering Jesus, because of His having worked. But he speaks
to them shortly, as to men who had already heard; for without mentioning His
name, or that "He said unto me, Go, wash," he at once saith,
Ver. 15. "He
put clay upon my eyes, and I washed, and do see."
Because
the slander was now become great, and the Jews had said, "Behold
what work Jesus doth on the Sabbath day, he anointeth with clay!" But
observe, I pray you, how the blind man is not disturbed. When being questioned
he spake in the presence of those others without danger, it was no such great
thing to tell the truth, but the wonder is, that now when he is placed in a
situation of greater fear, he neither denies nor contradicts what he had said
before. What then did the Pharisees, or rather what did the others also? They
had brought him (to the Pharisees), as being about to deny; but, on the contrary,
that befell them which they desired not, and they learned more exactly. And
this they everywhere have to endure, in the case of miracles; but this point
we will more clearly demonstrate in what follows. What said the Pharisees?
Ver. 16. "Some said," (not all, but the more forward,) "This
man is not of God, because he keepeth not the Sabbath day; others said, How
can a man that is a sinner do such miracles?"
Seest
thou that they were led up(3) by the miracles? For hear what they say now,
who before his had
sent to bring
Him. And if all did not so, (for being
rulers through vainglory they fell into unbelief,) yet still the greater number
even of the rulers believed on Him, but confessed Him not. Now the multitude
was easily overlooked, as being of no great account in their synagogue, but
the rulers being more conspicuous had the greater difficulty in speaking boldly,
or some the love of rule restrained, others cowardice, and the fear of the
many. Wherefore also He said, "How can ye believe who receive honor from
men?"(4) (c. v. 44.) And these who were seeking to kill Him unjustly said
that they were of God, but that He who healed the blind could not be of God,
because He kept not the Sabbath; to which the others objected, that a sinner
could not do such miracles. Those first maliciously keeping silence about what
had taken place, brought forward the seeming transgression; for they said not, "He
healeth on the Sabbath day," but, "He keepeth not the Sabbath." These,
on the other hand, replied weakly, for when they ought to have shown that the
Sabbath was not broken, they rely only upon the miracles; and with reason,
for they still thought that He was a man. If this had not been the case, they
might besides have urged in His defense, that He was Lord of the Sabbath which
Himself had made, but as yet they had not this opinion. Anyhow, none of them
dared to say what he wished openly, or in the way of an assertion, but only
in the way of doubt, some from not having boldness of speech, others through
love of rule.
"There was therefore a division among them." This division first
began among the people, then later among the rulers also, and some said, "He
is a good man"; others, "Nay, but he deceiveth the people." (c.
vii. 12.) Seest thou that the rulers were more void of understanding than the
many, since they were divided later than they? and after they were divided,
they did not exhibit any noble feeling, when they saw the Pharisees pressing
upon them. Since had they been entirely separated from them, they would soon
have known the truth. For it is possible to do well in separating. Wherefore
also Himself hath said, "I am come not to bring peace upon the earth but
a sword." (Matt. x. 34.) For there is an evil concord, and there is a
good disagreement. Thus they who built the tower (Gen. xi. 4), agreed together
to their own hurt; and these same again were separated, though unwillingly,
yet for their good. Thus also Corah and his company agreed together for evil,
therefore they were separated for good; and Judas agreed with the Jews for
evil. So division may be good, and agreement may be evil. Wherefore It saith, "If
thine eye offend thee, smite it out,(1) if thy foot, cut it off." (Matt.
v. 29, and xviii. 8.) Now if we must separate ourselves from an ill-joined
limb, must we not much more from friends united to us for evils(2)? So that
agreement is not in all cases a good, just as division is not in all cases
an evil.
[3.] These
things I say, that we may shun wicked men, and follow the good; for if in
the case of our
limbs
we cut off that which is rotten and incurable,
fearing test the rest of the body should catch the same disease, and if we
do this not as having no care for that part, but rather as desiring to preserve
the remainder, how much more must we do this in the case of those who consent
with us for evil? If we can set them right without receiving injury ourselves,
we ought to use every means to do so; but if they remain incorrigible and may
injure us, it is necessary to cut them off and cast them away. For so they
will often be(3) gainers rather (than losers). Wherefore also Paul exhorted,
saying, "And ye shall put away from among yourselves that wicked person";
and, "that he that hath done this deed may be put away from among you." (1
Cor. v. 13, 2.) A dreadful thing, dreadful indeed, is the society of wicked
men; not so quickly doth the pestilence seize or the itch infect those that
come in contact with such as are under the disease, as doth the wickedness
of evil men. For "evil communications corrupt good manners." (1 Cor.
xv. 33.) And again the Prophet saith, "Come out from among them, and be
ye separate." (Isa. lii. 11.) Let no one then have a wicked man for his
friend. For if when we have bad sons we publicly disclaim them, without regarding
nature or its laws, or the constraint which it lays upon us, much more ought
we to fly from our companions and acquaintances when they are wicked. Because
even if we receive no injury from them, we shall anyhow not be able to escape
ill report, for strangers search not into our lives, but judge us from our
companions. This advice I address to young men and maidens. "Providing,"(4)
It saith, "things honest," not only in the sight of the Lord, but
also "in the sight of all men." (Rom. xii. 17.) Let us then use every
means that our neighbor be not offended. For a life, though it be very upright,
if it offend others hath lost all. But how is it possible for the life that
is upright to offend? When the society of those that are not upright invests
it with an evil reputation; for when, trusting in ourselves, we consort with
bad men, even though we be not harmed, we offend others. These things I say
to men and women and maidens, leaving it to their conscience to see exactly
how many evils are produced from this source. Neither I, perhaps, nor any of
the more perfect, suspect any ill; but the simpler brother is harmed by occasion
of thy perfection; and thou oughtest to be careful also for his infirmity.
And even if he receive no injury, yet the Greek is harmed. Now Paul biddeth
us be "without offense, both to Jews and Greeks, and to the Church of
God." (1 Cor. x. 32.) (I think no evil of the virgin, for I love virginity,
and "love thinketh no evil" (1 Cor. xiii. 5); I am a great admirer
of that state of life,(5) and I cannot have so much as an unseemly thought
about it.) How shall we persuade those that are without? For we must take forethought
for them also. Let us then so order what relates to ourselves, that none of
the unbelievers may be able even to find a just handle of accusation against
us. For as they who show forth a right life glorify God, so they who do the
contrary cause Him to be blasphemed. May no such persons be among(1) us: but
may our works so shine, that our Father which is in Heaven may be glorified,
and that we may enjoy the honor which is from Him. To which may we all attain,
through the grace and lovingkindness of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom and
with whom, to the Father and the Holy Ghost, be glory forever and ever. Amen.
HOMILY LVIII.
JOHN ix. 17, 18.
"They
say unto the blind man again, What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened
thine eves?
He said,
He is a Prophet. The Jews then did not believe."
[1.] We
must go over the Scriptures not in a chance way or carelessly, but with all
exactness, that
we be not
entangled. Since even now in this place
one might with show of reason question, how, when they had asserted, "This
man is not of God, because he keepeth not the Sabbath," they now say to
the man, "What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes?" and
not, "What sayest thou of him, that he hath broken the Sabbath?" but
put now that which was the ground of the defense, not that of the accusation.
What then have we to reply? That these (who speak) are not the men who said, "This
man is not of God," but those who separated themselves from them, who
also said, "A man that is a sinner cannot(2) do such miracles." For
desiring to silence their opponents the more, in order that they may not seem
to be partisans of Christ, they bring forward the man who had received proof
of His power, and question him. Observe now the wisdom of the poor man, he
speaketh more wisely than them all. First he saith, "He is a Prophet";
and shrank not from the judgment(3) of the perverse Jews who spake against
Him and said, "How can this man be of God, not keeping the Sabbath?" but
replied to them, "He is a Prophet."
"And they(4) did not believe that he had been blind, and received his
sight, until they had called his parents."(5)
Observe
in how many ways they attempt to obscure and take away the miracle. But this
is the nature
of truth, by
the very means by which it seems to be
assailed by men, by these it becomes stronger, it shines by means of that by
which it is obscured. For if these things had not taken place, the miracle
might have been suspected by the many; but now, as if desiring to lay bare
the truth, so do they use all means, and would not have acted otherwise, supposing
they had done all in Christ's behalf. For they first attempted to cast Him
down by occasion of this mode (of cure), saying, "How opened he thine
eyes?" that is, "was it by some sorcery?" In another place also,
when they had no charge to bring against Him, they endeavored to insult the
mode of the cure, saying, "He doth not cast out devils save by Beelzebub." (Matt.
xii. 24.) And here again, when they have nothing to say, they betake themselves
to the time (of cure), saying, "He breaketh the Sabbath"; and again, "He
is a sinner." Yet He asked you, who would slay(6) Him, and who were ready
to lay hold of His actions, most plainly, saying, "Which of you convinceth
Me of sin?" (c. viii. 46); and no man spake, nor said "Thou blasphemest
because thou makest thyself without sin." But if they had had it in their
power to say so, they would not have held their peace. For they who because
they heard that He was before Abraham would have stoned Him, and said that
He was not of God, who boasted that they, murderers as they were, were of God,
but who said that One who did such wonders, after that He had wrought a cure,
was not of God,(7) because He kept not the Sabbath, if they had had but a shadow
of a charge against Him, would never have let it pass. And if they call Him
a sinner because He seemed to break the Sabbath, this charge also is shown
to be unsound, when those who are ranked with them condemn their great coldness
and littleness of soul.(8) Being therefore entangled on every side, they afterwards
betake themselves to something else more shameless and impudent. What is that?
They "did not believe," It saith, "that he had been blind, and
received his sight." How then did they charge Christ with not keeping
the Sabbath? Plainly, as having believed. But why gave ye not heed to the great
number of people? to the neighbors who knew him? As I said, falsehood everywhere
defeats itself by the very means by which it seems to annoy the truth, and
makes the truth to appear more bright. Which was now the case. For that no
one might say that his neighbors and those who had seen him did not speak with
precision, but guessed from a likeness,(1) they bring forward his parents,
by whom they succeeded against their will in proving that what had taken place
was real,(2) since the parents best of all knew their own child. When they
could not terrify the man himself, but beheld him with all boldness proclaim
his Benefactor, they thought to wound the miracle by means of his parents.
Observe the malice of their questioning. For what saith it? Having placed them
in the midst so as to throw them into distress,(3) they apply the questioning
with great severity and anger,
Ver. 19. "Is this your son?" (and they said not, "who once
was blind," but) "of whom ye say that he was born blind?"
As if
they were acting deceitfully, and plotting on behalf of(4) Christ. O ye accursed,
utterly
accursed! What
father would choose to invent such falsehoods
against his child? For they almost say, "Whom ye have made out blind,
and not only so, but have spread abroad the report everywhere."
"How
then doth he now see?"
[2.] O
folly! "Yours," saith one, "is the trick(5) and the
contrivance." For by these two things do they attempt to lead the parents
to a denial; by using the words, "Whom ye say," and, "How then
doth he now see?" Now when there were three questions asked, whether he
was their son, whether he had been blind, and how he received his sight, the
parents only acknowledged two of them, but do not add the third. And this came
to pass for the sake of the truth, in order that none other save the man that
was healed, who was also worthy(6) of credit, should acknowledge this matter.
And how would the parents have favored (Christ), when even of what they knew
some part they spake not through fear of the Jews? What say they?
Ver. 20,
21. "We
know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; but by what means
he now seeth
we know not, or who hath opened his eyes we
know not; he is of age, he shall speak for himself."
By making
him to be worthy of credit, they begged off themselves; "He
is not a child, say they, nor incapable,(7) but able to testify for himself."
Ver. 22. "These
words spake they,(8) because they feared the Jews."
Observe
how the Evangelist again brings forward their opinion and thoughts. This
I say, because of that
speech
which they before uttered, when they said, "He
maketh Himself equal to God." (c. v. 18.) For had that also been the opinion
of the Jews but not the judgment of Christ, he would have added and said, that "it
was a Jewish opinion."(9) When therefore the parents referred them to
him that had been healed, they called him again the second time, and did not
say openly and shamelessly, "Deny that Christ healed thee," but would
fain effect this under a pretense of piety.
Ver. 24. "Give,"(10) saith one, "the
glory to God."
For to
have said to the parents, "Deny that he is your son, and that
he was born(11) blind," would have seemed very ridiculous. And again,
to have said this to himself would have been manifest shamelessness. Wherefore
they say not so, but manage the matter in another way, saying, "Give God
the glory," that is, "confess that this man hath wrought nothing."
"We
know that this man is a sinner."
"Why then did ye not convict Him when He said, 'Which of you convinceth
Me of sin?' (c. viii. 46.) Whence know ye that He is a sinner?" After
that they had said, "Give God the glory," and the man had made no
reply, Christ meeting praised him, and did not rebuke him, nor say, "Wherefore
hast thou not given glory to God?" But what said He? "Dost thou believe
on the Son of God?"(12) (ver. 35), that thou mayest learn that this is "to
give glory to God." Now had He not been equal in honor to the Father,
this would not have been giving glory; but since he that honoreth the Son honoreth
the Father also, the blind is with good reason not rebuked. Now while they
expected that the parents would contradict and deny the miracle, the Pharisees
said nothing to the man himself, but when they saw that they profited nothing
by this, they again return to him, saying, "This man is a sinner."
Ver. 25. "He
answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not; one thing I
know, that,
whereas
I was blind, now I see."
Surely
the blind man was not terrified? That be far from him. How then doth he who
said, "He is a Prophet" (ver. 17), now say, "Whether
he be a sinner, I know not"? He said so, not as being in such a state
of mind, nor as having persuaded himself of this thing, but desiring to clear
Him from their charges by the testimony of the fact, not by(1) his own declaration,
and to make the defense credible, when the testimony of the good deed done
should decide the matter against them. Since if after many words when the blind
man said, "Except this were a righteous man he could not do such miracles" (ver.
33), they were so enraged as to reply, "Thou wast altogether born in sin,
and dost thou teach us?" what would they not have said, if he had spoken
so from the beginning; what would they not have done? "Whether he be a
sinner or not, I know not"; as though he had said, "I say nothing
in this man's favor, I make no declaration at present, yet this I certainly
know and would affirm, that if he were a sinner he could not have done such
things." Thus he kept himself free from suspicion, and his testimony uncorrupted,
as not speaking from partiality, but as bearing witness according to the fact.
When therefore they could neither upset nor remove what had been done, they
again return to their former plan, making trifling enquiries about the manner
of the cure, like men(2) who search on every side about a prey which is before
them, and cannot be hurt,(3) hastening round now in one direction, now in another;
and they recur to the man's former assertions, in order now to make them unsound
by continual questions, and say,
Ver. 26. "What
did he to thee? How opened he thine eyes?"
What was his reply? Having conquered and cast them down, he no longer speaks
to them submissly. As long as the matter needed enquiry and arguments he spake
guardedly, while he supplied the proof; but when he had conquered and gained
a splendid victory, he then takes courage, and tramples upon them. What saith
he?
Ver. 27. "I
have told you once,(4) and ye did not hear; wherefore would ye hear it again?"
Seest
thou the bold-speaking of a beggar towards Scribes and Pharisees? So strong
is truth, so weak is
falsehood.
Truth, though she take hold but of ordinary
men, maketh them to appear glorious; the other, even though it be with the
strong, shows them weak? What he saith is of this kind: "Ye give no heed
to my words, therefore I will no longer speak or answer you continually, who
question(6) me to no purpose, and who do not desire to hear in order to learn,
but that you may insult over my words."
"Will
ye also be His disciples?"
[3.] Now
he hath ranked(7) himself among the band of disciples, for the "will
ye also?" is the expression of one who is declaring himself to be a disciple.
Then he mocked and annoyed them abundantly. For since he knew that this struck
them hard, he said it, wishing to upbraid them with exceeding severity; the
act of a soul courageous, soaring on high and despising their madness, pointing
out the greatness of this dignity, in which he was very confident, and showing
that they insulted him who was a man worthy to be admired, but that he took
not the insult to himself, but grasped as an honor what they offered as a reproach.
Ver. 28. "Thou
art his disciple, but we are Moses' disciples."
"But this cannot be. Ye are neither Moses' nor this Man's; for were ye
Moses', ye would become this Man's also." Wherefore Christ before said
unto them, because they were continually betaking themselves to these speeches, "Had
ye believed Moses, ye would have believed Me, for he wrote of Me." (c.
v. 46.)
Ver. 29. "We know that God spake unto Moses."(8)
By whose
word, whose report? "That of our forefathers," saith one.
Is not He then more to be believed than your forefathers, who confirmeth by
miracles that He came from God, and that He speaketh things from above? They
said not, "We have heard that God spake to Moses," but, "We
know." Do ye affirm, O Jews, what ye have by hearing, as knowing it, but
deem what ye have by sight as less certain than what ye have by hearing? Yet
the one ye saw not, but heard, the other ye did not hear, but saw. What then
saith the blind man?
Ver. 30. "Why herein is a marvelous thing, that ye know not whence He
is, and He doeth such miracles."(9)
"That
a Man, who is not one of the distinguished or noble or illustrious among
you, can do
such things;
so that it is in every way clear that He is
God, needing no human aid."
Ver. 31. "We
know that God heareth not sinners."
Since
they had been the first to say, "How can a man that is a sinner
do such miracles?" (ver. 16), he now brings forward even their judgment,
reminding them of their own words. "This opinion," saith he, "is
common to me and you. Stand fast now to it." And observe, I pray you,
his wisdom. He turns about the miracle in every way, because they could not
do away with it, and from it he draws his inferences. Seest thou that at first
he said "Whether he be a sinner or not, I know not"? not doubting
(God forbid!) but knowing that He was not a sinner. At least now, when he had
an opportunity, see how he defended Him. "We know that God heareth not
sinners":
"But if any man be a worshiper of God, and doeth His will."(1)
Here he
not only hath cleared Him from sin, but declareth that He is very pleasing
to God, and
doeth all His
will. For since they called themselves(2)
worshipers of God, he added, "and doeth His will"; "since," saith
he, "it is not sufficient to know God: men must also do His will." Then
he magnifies what had been done, saying,
Ver. 32. "Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened
the eyes of one that was born blind."(3)
"If now ye acknowledge(4) that God heareth not sinners, and this Person
hath wrought a miracle, and such a miracle as no man ever wrought, it is clear
that He hath surpassed all things in(5) virtue, and that His power is greater
than belongeth to man." What then say they?
Ver. 34. "Thou
wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us?"
As long
as they expected that he would deny Christ, they deemed him trustworthy,
calling upon him
once and
a second time. If ye(6) deemed him not trustworthy,
why did ye call and question him a second time? But when he spake the truth,
unabashed, then, when they ought most to have admired, they condemned him.
But what is the, "Thou wast altogether born in sins"? They here unsparingly
reproach him with his very blindness, as though they had said, "Thou art
in sins from thy earliest age"
insinuating
that on this account he was born blind; which was contrary to reason. On
this point at
least Christ
comforting him said, "For judgment
I am come into the world, that they which see not might see, and that they
which see might be made blind." (c. ix. 39.)
"Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us?" Why,
what had the man said? Did he set forth his private opinion? Did he not set
forth a common judgment, saying, "We know that God heareth not sinners"?Did
he not produce your own words?
"And
they cast him out."
Hast thou beheld the herald of the truth, how poverty was no hindrance to
his true wisdom? Seest thou what reproaches, what sufferings he bare from the
beginning, and how by word and by deed he testified?
[4.] Now these things are recorded, that we too may imitate them. For if the
blind man, the beggar, who had not even seen Him, straightway showed such boldness
even before he was encouraged by Christ, standing opposed to a whole people,
murderous, possessed, and raving, who desired by means of his voice to condemn
Christ, if he neither yielded nor gave back, but most boldly stopped their
mouths, and chose rather to be cast out than to betray the truth; how much
more ought we, who have lived so. long in the faith, who have seen ten thousand
marvels wrought by faith, who have received greater benefits than he, have
recovered the sight of the eyes within, have beheld the ineffable Mysteries,
and have been called to such honor, how ought we, I say, to exhibit all boldness
of speech towards those who attempt to accuse, and who say anything against
the Christians, and to stop their mouths, and not to acquiesce without an effort.
And we shall be able to do this, if we are bold,(7) and give heed to the Scriptures,
and hear them not carelessly. For if one should come in here regularly, even
though he read not at home, if he attends to what is said here, one year even
is sufficient to make him well versed in them; because we do not to-day read
one kind of Scriptures, and tomorrow another, but always and continually the
same. Still such is the wretched disposition of the many, that after so much
reading, they do not even know the names of the Books, and are not ashamed
nor tremble at entering so carelessly into a place where they may hear God's
word. Yet if a harper, or dancer, or stage-player call the city, they all run
eagerly, and feel obliged to him for the call, and spend the half of an entire
day in attending to him alone; but when God speaketh to us by Prophets and
Apostles, we yawn, we scratch ourselves, we are drowsy. And in summer, the
heat seems too great, and we betake ourselves to the market place; and again,
in winter, the rain and mire are a hindrance, and we sit at home; yet at horse
races, though there is no roof over them to keep off the wet, the greater number,
while heavy(8) rains are falling, and the wind is dashing the water into their
faces, stand like madmen, caring not for cold, and wet, and mud, and length
of way, and nothing either keeps them at home, or prevents their going thither.
But here, where there are roofs over head, and where the warmth is admirable,
they hold back instead of running together; and this too, when the gain is
that of their own souls. How is this tolerable, tell me? Thus it happens, that
while we are more skilled than any in those matters, in things necessary we
are more ignorant than children. If a man call you a charioteer, or a dancer,
you say that you have been insulted, and use every means to wipe off the affront;
but if he draw you to be a spectator of the action, you do not start away,
and the art whose name you shun, you almost in every case pursue. But where
you ought(1) to have both the action and the name, both to be and to be called
a Christian, you do not even know what kind of thing the action is. What can
be worse than this folly?(2) These things I have desired continually to say
to you, but I fear lest I gain hatred in vain and unprofitably. For I perceive
that not only the young are mad, but the old also; about whom I am especially
ashamed, when I see a man venerable from his white hairs, disgracing those
white hairs, and drawing a child after him. What is worse than this mockery?
What more shameful than this conduct? The child is taught by the father to
act unseemly.
[5.] Do
the words sting? This is what I desire, that you should suffer the pain caused
by the words,
in order
to be delivered from the disgrace caused
by the actions. For there are some too far colder than these, who are not even
ashamed at the things spoken of, nay, who even put together(3) a long argument
in defense of the action. If you ask them who was Amos or Obadiah, or what
is the number of the Prophets or Apostles, they cannot even open their mouth
but for horses and charioteers, they compose excuses more cleverly than sophists
or rhetoricians, and after all this, they say, "What is the harm? what
is the loss?" This is what I groan for, that ye do not so much as know
that the action is a loss, nor have a sense of its evils. God hath given to
thee an appointed space of life for serving Him, and dost thou while thou spendest
it vainly, and at random, and on nothing useful, still ask, "What loss
is there?" If thou hast spent a little money to no purpose, thou callest
it a loss: when thou spendest whole days of thine upon the devil's pageants,
thinkest thou that thou art doing nothing wrong? Thou oughtest to spend all
thy life in supplications(4) and prayers, whereas thou wastest thy life and
substance(5) heedlessly, and to thine own hurt, on shouts, and uproar, and
shameful words, and fighting, and unseasonable pleasure, and actions performed
by trickery, and after all this thou askest, "What is the loss?" not
knowing thou shouldest be lavish of anything rather than time.(6) Gold, if
thou shalt have spent, thou mayest get again; but if thou lose time, thou shall
hardly recover that. Little is dealt out to us in this present life; if therefore
we employ it not as we ought, what shall we say when we depart "there"?
For tell me, if thou hadst commanded one of thy sons to learn some art, and
then he had continually stayed at home, or even passed his time somewhere else,
would not the teacher reject him? Would he not say to thee, "Thou hast
made an agreement with me, and appointed a time; if now thy son will not spend
this time with me but in other places, how shall I produce him to thee as a
scholar?"(7) Thus also we must speak. For God will say also to us, "I
gave you time to learn this art of piety, wherefore have ye foolishly and uselessly
wasted that time? Why did ye neither go constantly to the teacher, nor give
heed to his words?" For to show that piety is an art, hear what the Prophet
saith, "Come, ye children, hearken unto me; I will teach you the fear
of the Lord." (Ps. xxxiv. 11.) And again, "Blessed is the man whom
Thou instructest, Lord, and teachest him out of Thy Law." (Ps. xciv. 12.)
When therefore thou hast spent this time in vain, what excuse wilt thou have? "And
why," saith some one, "did He deal out to us but little time?" O
senselessness and ingratitude! That for which thou wert most bounden to give
thanks to Him, for that He hath cut short thy labors and abridged thy toils,
and made the rest long and everlasting, for this dost thou find fault, and
art discontented?
But I
know not how we have brought our discourse to this point, and have made it
so long; we must
therefore
shorten it now. For this too is a part of our
wretchedness, that here if the discourse be long, we all become careless, while
there(8) they begin at noon, and retire by torch and lamp light. However, that
we be not always chiding, we now entreat and beseech you, grant this favor
to us and(9) to yourselves; and getting free from all other matters, to these
let us rivet ourselves. So shall we gain from you joy and gladness, and honor
on your account, and a recompense for these labors; while ye will reap all
the reward, because having been aforetime so madly riveted to the stage, ye
tore yourselves away, through fear of God, and by our exhortations, from that
malady, and brake your bonds, and hastened unto God. Nor is it "there" alone
that ye shall receive your reward, but "here" also ye shall enjoy
pure pleasure. Such a thing is virtue; besides giving us crowns in heaven,
even here it maketh life pleasant to us. Let us then be persuaded by what has
been said, that we may obtain the blessings both here and hereafter, through
the grace and lovingkindness of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom and with whom,
to the Father and the Holy Ghost be glory, now and ever and world without end.
Amen.
HOMILY LIX.
JOHN ix. 34-36.
"And they cast him out. And Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and
when He had found him, He said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?
He answered and said, Who is He, Lord, that I might believe on Him?" And
the rest.
[1.]. They who for the sake of the truth and the confession of(1) Christ suffer
anything terrible and are insulted, these are especially honored. For as he
who loseth his possessions for His sake, the same it is who most findeth them;
as he who hateth his own life, the same it is who most loveth it; so too he
who is insulted, is the same who is most honored. As fell out in the case of
the blind man. The Jews cast him out from the Temple, and the Lord of the Temple
found him; he was separated from that pestilent company, and met with the Fountain
of salvation; he was dishonored by those who dishonored Christ, and was honored
by the Lord of Angels. Such are the prizes of truth. And so we, if we leave
our possessions in this world, find confidence in the next; if here we give
to the afflicted, we shall have rest in heaven; if we be insulted for the sake
of God, we are honored both here and there.
When they
had cast him out from the Temple, Jesus found him. The Evangelist shows,
that He came
for the purpose
of meeting him. And observe how He recompenseth
him, by that which is the chiefest of blessings. For He made Himself known
to him who before knew Him not, and enrolled him into the company of His own
disciples. Observe also how the Evangelist describes the exact circumstances;
for when Christ had said, "Dost thou believe on the Son of God?" the
man replied, "Lord, who is He?" For as yet he knew Him not, although
he had been healed; because he was blind before he came to his Benefactor,
and after the cure, he was being worried by those dogs. Therefore, like some
judge at the games, He receiveth the champion who had toiled much and gained
the crown. And what saith He? "Dost thou believe on the Son of God?" What
is this, after so much arguing against the Jews, after so many words, He asketh
him, "Dost thou believe?" He spake it not from ignorance, but desiring
to make Himself known, and showing that He gently valued the man's faith. "This
great multitude," He saith, "hath insulted Me, but of them I make
no account; for one thing I care, that thou shouldest believe. For better is
one who doeth the will of God, than ten thousand transgressors." "Dost
thou believe on the Son of God?" As having both been present, and as approving
what had been said by him, He asketh this question; and first,(2) He brought
him to a state of longing for Himself. For He said not directly, "Believe," but
in the way of an enquiry. What then said the man? "Lord, who is He, that
I might believe on Him?" The expression is that of a longing and enquiring
soul. He knoweth not Him in whose defense he had spoken so much, that thou
mayest learn his love of truth. For he had not yet seen Him.
Ver. 37. "Jesus
saith unto him, Thou hast both seen Him, and it is He that talketh with thee."
He said
not "I am He," but as yet in an intermediate(3) and reserved
manner, "Thou hast both seen Him." This was still uncertain; therefore
He addeth more clearly, "It is He that talketh with thee."
Ver. 38. "He saith, Lord, I believe; and he worshiped Him" (straightway(4)).
He said
not, "I am He that healed thee, that bade thee, Go, wash in Siloam ";
but keeping silence on all these points, He saith, "Dost thou believe
on the Son of God?" and then the man, showing his great earnestness, straightway
worshiped; which few of those who were healed had done; as, for instance, the
lepers, and some others; by this act declaring His divine power. For that no
one might think that what had been said by him was a mere expression, he added
also the deed. When he had worshiped, Christ said,
Ver. 39. "For judgment I am come into the world, that they which see
not might see, and that they which see might be made blind." So also saith
Paul; "What shall we say then? That the Gentiles which followed not after
righteousness have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which
is of the faith of Jesus; but Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness,
hath not attained to the law of righteousness." (Rom. ix. 30, 31.) By
saying, "For judgment I am come into this world," He both made the
man stronger respecting the faith, and aroused those who followed Him; for
the Pharisees were following Him. And the, "For judgment," He spake
with reference to a greater punishment; showing that they who had given sentence
against Him, had received sentence against themselves; that they who had condemned
Him as a sinner, were themselves the persons condemned. In this passage He
speaketh of two recoveries of sight, and two blindnesses; one sensible, the
other spiritual.
Ver. 40. "Some
of them that followed Him, say unto Him,(1) Are we also blind?"
As in
another place they said, "We were never servants to any man";
and, "We be not born of fornication" (c. viii. 33, 41); so now they
gape on material things alone, and are ashamed of this kind of blindness. Then
to show that it was better for them to be blind than seeing, He saith,
Ver. 41. "If
ye were blind, ye should have no sin."
Since
they deemed the calamity a matter to be ashamed of, He turneth this back
upon their own head,
telling
them, that "this very thing would have
rendered your punishment more tolerable"; cutting away on every side their
human thoughts, and leading them to a notion high and marvelous.
"But
now ye say, We see."
As He
saith in that other place, "Of whom ye said that He was your God" (c.
viii. 54); so too here, "Now ye say that ye see,(2) but ye see not." He
showeth that what they deemed a great matter for praise, brought punishment
upon them. He also comforted him who was blind from his birth, concerning his
former maimed state, and then speaketh concerning their blindness. For He directeth
His whole speech to this end, that they may not say, "We did not refuse
to come to thee owing to our blindness, but we turn away and avoid thee as
a deceiver."
[2.] And
not without a cause hath the Evangelist mentioned, that they of the Pharisees
who were
with Him heard
these things, and said, "Are we blind
also?" but to remind thee that these were the men who first withdrew from
and then stoned Him, for they were persons who followed Him superficially,
and who easily changed to the contrary opinion. How then doth He prove that
He is not a deceiver, but a Shepherd? By laying down the distinguishing marks
both of the shepherd, and of him who is a deceiver and a spoiler, and from
these affording them opportunity of searching into the truth of the matter.
And first He showeth who is a deceiver and a spoiler, calling him so from the
Scriptures, and saying,
Chap.
x. ver. 1. "Verily,
verily, I say unto you, he that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold,
but climbeth up some other way, the same is
a thief and a robber."
Observe
the marks of a robber; first, that he doth not enter openly; secondly, not
according to
the Scriptures,
for this is the, "not by the door." Here
also He referreth to those who had been before, and to those who should be
after Him, Antichrist and the false Christs, Judas and Theudas, and whatever
others there have been of the same kind. And with good cause He calleth the
Scriptures "a door," for they bring us to God, and open to us the
knowledge of God, they make the sheep, they guard them, and suffer not the
wolves to come in after them. For Scripture, like some sure door, barreth the
passage against the heretics, placing us in a state of safety as to all that
we desire, and not allowing us to wander; and if we undo it not, we shall not
easily be conquered by our foes. By it we can know all, both those who are,
and those who are not, shepherds. But what is "into the fold"? It
refers to the sheep, and the care of them. For he that useth not the Scriptures,
but "climbeth up some other way," that is, who cutteth out for himself
another and an unusual(3) way, "the same is a thief." Seest thou
from this too that Christ agreeth with the Father, in that He bringeth forward
the Scriptures? On which account also He said to the Jews, "Search the
Scriptures" (c. v. 39); and brought forward Moses, and called him and
all the Prophets witnesses, for "all," saith He,(4) "who hear
the Prophets shall come to Me"; and," Had ye believed Moses, ye would
have believed Me." But here He hath put the same thing metaphorically.
And by saying, "climbeth up some other way," He alluded to the Scribes,
because they taught for commandments the doctrines of men, and transgressed
the Law (Matt. xv. 9); with which He reproached them, and said, "None
of you doeth the Law." (c. vii. 19.) Well did He say, "climbeth up," not "entereth
in," since to climb is the act of a thief intending to overleap a wall,
and who doeth all with danger. Hast thou seen how He hath sketched the robber?
now observe the character of the shepherd. What then is it?
Ver. 2-4. "He
that entereth in by the door, the same is the shepherd of the sheep; to him
the
doorkeeper
openeth, and the sheep hear his voice,
and he calleth his own by name.(1) And when he hath brought them out, he goeth
before them."
[3.] He
hath set down the marks of the shepherd, and of the evil doer; let us now
see how He hath
fitted
to them what followeth. "To him," He
saith, "the doorkeeper openeth"; He continueth in the metaphor to
make the discourse more emphatic. But if thou shouldest be minded to examine
the parable word by word, there is nothing to hinder thee from supposing Moses
to be the doorkeeper, for to him were entrusted the oracles of God. "Whose
voice the sheep hear, and he calleth his own by name." Because they everywhere
said that He was a deceiver, and confirmed this by their own unbelief, saying, "Which(2)
of the rulers hath believed on him?" (c. vii. 48.) He showeth that they
ought not on account of the unbelief of those persons to call Him a spoiler
and deceiver, but that they, because they gave no heed to Him were consequently
even excluded from the rank of sheep. For if a shepherd's part is to enter
through the usual door, and if He entered through this, all they who followed
Him might be sheep, but they who rent themselves away, hurt not the reputation
of the Shepherd, but cast themselves out from the kindred of the sheep. And
if farther on He saith that He is "the door," we must not again be
disturbed, for He also calleth Himself "Shepherd," and "Sheep," and
in different ways proclaimeth His dispensations. Thus, when He bringeth us
to the Father, He calleth Himself "a Door," when He taketh care of
us, "a Shepherd"; and it is that thou mayest not suppose, that to
bring us to the Father is His only office, that He calleth Himself a Shepherd. "And
the sheep hear his voice, and he calleth his own sheep, and leadeth them out,
and goeth before them." Shepherds indeed do the contrary, for they follow
after them; but He to show that He will lead all men to the truth, doeth differently;
as also when He sent the sheep, He sent them, not out of the way of wolves,
but "in the midst of wolves." (Matt. x. 16.) For far more wonderful
is this manner of keeping sheep than ours. He seemeth to me also to allude
to the blind man, for him too, having "called," He "led out" from
the midst of the Jews, and the man heard "His voice," and "knew" it.
Ver. 5. "And(3)
a stranger will they not follow, for they know not the voice of strangers."
Certainly
here He speaketh of Theudas and Judas, (for "all, as many as
believed on them, were scattered" [Acts v. 36], It saith,) or of the false
Christs who after that time should deceive. For lest any should say that He
was one of these, He in many ways separateth Himself from them. And the first
difference He setteth down is His teaching from the Scriptures; for He by means
of these led men to Him, but the others did not from these draw men after them.
The second is, the obedience of the sheep; for on Him they all believed, not
only while He lived, but when He had died; the others they straightway left.
With these we may mention a third difference, no trifling one. They did all
as rebels,(4) and to cause revolts, but He placed Himself so far from such
suspicion, that when they would have made Him a king, He fled; and when they
asked, "Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar?" He bade them pay
it, and Himself gave the two drachm piece. (Matt. xvii. 27.) Besides this,
He indeed came for the saving of the sheep, "That they might have life,
and that they might have more abundantly" (ver. 10), but the others deprived
them even of this present life. They betrayed those who were entrusted to them
and fled, but He withstood so nobly as even to give up His life. They unwillingly,
and by compulsion, and desiring to escape, suffered what they suffered, but
He willingly and by choice endured all.
Ver. 6. "This
parable spake Jesus unto them, but they understood not what things they were
which
He spake
unto them."
And wherefore spake He obscurely? Because He would make them more attentive;
when He had effected this, He removes the obscurity, saying,
Ver. 9. "I
am(5) the door, by Me if any man enter in, he(6) shall go in and out, and
find
pasture."
As though
He had said, "shall be in safety and security," (but by "pasture," He
here meaneth His nurturing and feeding the sheep, and His power(7) and Lordship,)
that is, "shall remain within, and none shall thrust him out." Which
took place in the case of the Apostles, who came in and went out securely,
as having become lords of all the world, and none was able to cast them out.
Ver. 8. "All
that ever came before Me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear
them."
He doth
not here speak of the Prophets, (as the heretics assert,) for as many as
believed on Christ
did hear them
also, and were persuaded by them; but of
Theudas and Judas, and the other exciters of sedition. Besides, He saith, "the
sheep did not hear them," as praising them; now nowhere is He seen to
praise those who refused to hearken to the Prophets, but, on the contrary,
to reproach and accuse them vehemently; whence it is evident that the, "did
not hear," refers to those leaders of sedition.
Ver. 10. "The
thief cometh not but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy."
Which then took place when all (their followers) were slain and perished.
"But I am come that they might have life, and that they might have more."(1)
And what
is "more" than life, tell me? The kingdom of heaven. But
He doth not as yet say this, but dwelleth on the name of "life," which
was known to them.
Ver. 11. "I
am the good Shepherd."
Here He next speaketh concerning the Passion, showing that this should be
for the salvation of the world, and that He came to it not unwillingly. Then
again He mentioneth the character of the shepherd and the hireling.
"For the shepherd(2) layeth down his life."(3)
Ver. 12. "But he that is an hireling and not a shepherd, whose own the
sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep and fleeth, and
the wolf cometh and catcheth them."(4)
Here He
declareth Himself to be Master even as the Father, if so be that He is the
Shepherd, and the
sheep
are His. Seest thou how He speaketh in a more
lofty tone in His parables, where the sense is concealed; and giveth no open
handle to the listeners? What then doth this hireling? He "seeth the wolf
coming, and leaveth the sheep, and the wolf cometh, and scattereth them." This
those false teachers did, but He the contrary. For when He was taken, He said, "Let
these go their way, that the saying might be fulfilled" (c. xviii. 8,
9), that not one of them was lost. Here also we may suspect a spiritual(5)
wolf to be intended; for neither did Christ allow him to go and seize the sheep.
But he is not a wolf only, but a lion also. "Because our(6) adversary
the devil," It saith, "walketh about as a roaring lion." (1
Pet. v. 8.) He is also a serpent, and a dragon; for, "Tread ye(7) on serpents
and scorpions." (Luke x. 19.)
[4.] Wherefore,
I beseech you, let us remain pasturing beneath this Shepherd; and we shall
remain,
if we
obey Him, if we hear His voice, if we follow not
a stranger. And what is His voice? "Blessed are the poor in spirit, blessed
are the pure in heart, blessed are the merciful." (Matt. v. 3, 8, 7.)
If thus we do, we shall remain beneath the Shepherd, and the wolf will not
be able to come in; or if he come against us, he will do so to his own hurt.
For we have a Shepherd who so loveth us, that He gave even His life for us.
When therefore He is both powerful and loveth us, what is there to hinder us
from being saved? Nothing, unless we ourselves revolt from Him. And how can
we revolt? Hear Him say ing, "Ye cannot serve two masters, God and mammon." (Matt.
vi. 24.) If then we serve God, we shall not submit to the tyranny of mammon.
And truly a bitterer thing than any tyranny is the desire of riches; for it
brings no pleasure, but cares, and envyings, and plottings, and hatred, and
false accusations, and ten thousand impediments to virtue, indolence, wantonness,
greediness, drunkenness, which make even freemen slaves, nay, worse than slaves
bought with money, slaves not to men, but even to the most grievous of the
passions, and maladies of the soul. Such a one dares many things displeasing
to God and men, dreading lest any should remove from him this dominion. O bitter
slavery, and devlish tyranny! For this is the most grievous thing of all, that
when entangled in such evils we are pleased and hug our chain, and dwelling
in a prison house full of darkness, refuse to come forth to the light, but
rivet evil upon ourselves, and rejoice in our malady. So that we cannot be
freed, but are in a worse state than those that work the mines, enduring labors
and affliction, but not enjoying the fruit. And what is in truth worse than
all, if any one desire to free us from this bitter captivity, we do not suffer
it, but are even vexed and displeased, being in this respect in no better case
than madmen, or rather in a much more miserable state than any such, inasmuch
as we are not even willing to be delivered from our madness. What? was it for
this, O man, that thou wast brought into the world? Was it for this that thou
wast made a man, that thou mightest work in these mines, and gather gold? Not
for this did God create thee in His Image, but that thou mightest please Him,
that thou mightest obtain the things to come, that thou mightest join the choir
of Angels. Why now dost thou banish thyself from such a relationship, and thrust
thyself into the extreme of dishonor and meanness?(8) He who came by the same
birth pangs with thee, (the spiritual birth pangs I mean,) is perishing with
hunger, and thou art bursting with fullness: thy brother goeth about with naked
body, but thou providest garments even for thy garments, heaping up all this
clothing for the worms. How much better would it have been to put them on the
bodies of the poor; so would they have remained undestroyed, would have freed
thee from all care, and have won for thee the life to come. If thou wilt not
have them to be moth-eaten, give them to the poor, these are they who know
how to shake these garments well. The Body of Christ is more precious and more
secure than the coffer, for not only doth It keep the garments safe, not only
doth It preserve them unconsumed, but even rendereth them brighter. Oftentimes
the coffer taken with the garments causeth thee the utmost loss, but this place
of safety not even death can harm. With It we need neither doors nor bolts,
nor wakeful servants, nor any other such security, for our possessions are
free from all treacherous attacks, and are laid up under guard, as we may suppose
things laid up in heaven would be; for to all wickedness that place is inaccessible.
These thing we cease not continually to say to you, and you hearing are not
persuaded. The reason is, that we are of a soul which is mean, gaping upon
the earth, groveling on the ground. Or rather, God forbid that I should condemn
you all of wickedness, as though all were incurably diseased. For even if those
who are drunk with riches stop their ears against my words, yet they who live
in poverty will be able to look clearly to what I say. "But what," saith
some one, "hath, this to do with the poor? for they have no gold, or any
such garments." No, but they have bread and cold water, but they have
two obols, and feet to visit the sick, but they have a tongue and speech to
comfort the bedridden, but they have house and shelter to make the stranger
their inmate. We demand not from the poor such and such a number of talents
of gold, these we ask from the rich. But if a man be poor, and come to the
doors of others, our Lord is not ashamed to receive even an obol, but will
say that He hath received more from the giver, than from those who cast in
much. How many of those who now stand here would desire to have been born at
that time, when Christ went about the earth in the flesh, to have conversed
and sat at meat with Him? Lo, this may be done now, we may invite Him more
than then to a meal, and feast with Him, and that to greater profit. For of
those who then feasted with Him many even perished, as Judas and others like
him; but every one of those who invite Him to their houses now, and share with
Him table and roof, shall enjoy a great blessing. "Come," it saith, "ye
blessed of My Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation
of the world. For I was an hungered, and ye gave Me meat: I was thirsty, and
ye gave Me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took Me in; sick, and ye visited
Me; I was in prison, and and ye came unto Me." (Matt. xxv. 34-36.) That
then we may hear these words, let us clothe the naked, let us bring in the
stranger, feed the hungry, give the thirsty drink, let us visit the sick, and
look upon him that is in prison, that we may have boldness and obtain remission
of our sins, and share those good things which transcend both speech and thought.
Which may we all obtain, through the grace and lovingkindness of our Lord Jesus
Christ, to whom be the glory and the might(1) forever. Amen.
HOMILY LX.
JOHN x. 14, 15.
"I
am the Good Shepherd, and know My sheep, and am known of Mine. As the Father
knoweth Me, even so
know
I the Father; and I lay down My life for
the sheep."
[1.] A
GREAT matter, beloved, a great matter it is to preside over a Church: a matter
needing wisdom and
courage as great as that of which Christ speaketh,
that a man should lay down his life for the sheep, and never leave them deserted
or naked; that he should stand against the wolf nobly. For in this the shepherd
differs from the hireling; the one always looks to his own safety, caring not
for the sheep; the other always seeks that of the sheep, neglecting his own.
Having therefore mentioned the marks of a shepherd, Christ hath put two kinds
of spoilers; one, the thief who kills and steals; the other, one who doth not
these things, but who when they are done doth not give heed nor hinder them.
By the first, pointing to Theudas and those like him; by the second, exposing
the teachers of the Jews, who neither cared for nor thought about the sheep
entrusted to them. On which account Ezekiel of old rebuked them, and said, "Woe,(2)
ye shepherds of Israel! Do the shepherds feed themselves? Do not the shepherds
feed the sheep?" (Ezek. xxxiv. 2, LXX.) But they did the contrary, which
is the worst kind of wickedness, and the cause of all the rest. Wherefore It
saith, "They have not turned back the strayed, nor sought the lost, nor
bound up the broken, nor healed the sick, because they fed themselves and not
the sheep." (Ezek. xxxiv. 4.) As Paul also hath declared in another passage,
saying, "For all seek their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ's" (Phil.
ii. 21); and again, "Let no man seek his own, but every man his neighbor's." (1
Cor. x. 24.) From both Christ distinguisheth Himself; from those who came to
spoil, by saying, "I am come that they might have life, and that they
might have more abundantly" (ver. 10); and from those who cared not for
the sheep being carried away by wolves, by never deserting them, but even laying
down His life for them, that the sheep might not perish. For when they desired
to kill Him, He neither altered His teaching, nor betrayed those who believed
on Him, but stood firm, and chose to die. Wherefore He continually said, "I
am the good Shepherd." Then because His words appeared to be unsupported
by testimony, (for though the, "I lay down My life," was not long
after proved, yet the, "that they might have life, and that they might
have more abundantly," was to come to pass after their departure hence
in the life to come,) what doth He? He proveth one from the other; by giving
His mortal life(1) (He proveth) that He giveth life immortal.(2) As Paul also
saith, "If when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death
of His Son, much more being reconciled we shall be saved." (Rom. v. 10.)
And again in another place, "He that spared not His own Son, but delivered
Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?" (Rom.
viii. 32.)
But wherefore
do they not now bring against Him the charge which they did before, when
they said, "Thou bearest witness of thyself, thy witness
is not true?" (c. viii. 13.) Because He had often stopped their mouths,
and because His boldness towards them had been increased by His miracles. Then
because He said above "And the sheep hear his voice, and follow him," lest
any should say, "What then is this to those who believe not?" hear
what He addeth "And I know My sheep, and am known of Mine." As Paul
declared when he said, "God hath not rejected His people whom He foreknew" (Rom.
xi. 2); and Moses, "The Lord knew those that were His" (2 Tim. ii.
19; comp. Num. xvi. 5); "those," He saith, "I mean, whom He(3)
foreknew." Then that thou mayest not deem the measure of knowledge to
be equal, hear how He setteth the matter right by adding, "I know My sheep,
and am known of Mine." But the knowledge is not equal. "Where is
it equal?" In the case of the Father and Me, for there, "As the Father
knoweth Me, even so know I the Father." Had He not wished to prove this,
why should He have added that expression? Because He often ranked Himself among
the many, therefore, lest any one should deem that He knew as a man knoweth,
He added, "As the Father knoweth Me, even so know I the Father." "I
know Him as exactly as He knoweth Me." Wherefore He said, "No man
knoweth the Son(4) save the Father, nor the Father save the Son" (Luke
x. 22), speaking of a distinct kind of knowledge, and such as no other can
possess.
[2.] "I lay down My life." This He saith continually, to show that
He is no deceiver. So also the Apostle, when he desired to show that he was
a genuine teacher, and was arguing against the false apostles, established
his authority by his dangers and deaths, saying, "In stripes above measure,
in deaths oft." (2 Cor. xi. 23.) For to say, "I am light," and "I
am life," seemed to the foolish to be a matter of pride; but to say, "I
am willing to die," admitted not any malice or envy. Wherefore they do
not say to Him, "Thou bearest witness of thyself, thy witness is not true," for
the speech manifested very tender care for them, if indeed He was willing to
give Himself for those who would have stoned Him. On this account also He seasonably
introduceth mention of the Gentiles;
Ver. 16. "For other sheep also I have," He saith, "which
are not of this fold, them also must I bring."
Observe
again, the word "must," here used, doth not express necessity,
but is declaratory of something which will certainly come to pass. As though
He had said, "Why marvel ye if these shall follow Me, and if My sheep
shall hear My voice? When ye shall see others also following Me and hearing
My voice, then shall ye be astonished more." And be not confounded when
you hear Him say, "which are not of this fold" (Gal. v. 6), for the
difference relateth to the Law only, as also Paul saith, "Neither circumcision
availeth anything, nor uncircumcision."
"Them also must I bring." He
showeth that both these and those were scattered and mixed, and without shepherds,
because the good Shepherd had not
yet come. Then He proclaimeth beforehand their future union, that,
"They shall be one fold."(5)
Which
same thing also Paul(6) declared, saying, "For to make in Himself
of twain one new man." (Eph. ii. 15.)
Ver. 17. "'Therefore
doth My Father love Me, because I lay down My life, that I might take it
again."
What could
be more full of humanity than this saying, if so be that on our account our
Lord shall
be beloved,
because He dieth for us? What then? tell
me, was He not beloved during the time before this; did the Father now begin
to love Him, and were we the causes of His love? Seest thou how He used condescension?
But what doth He here desire to prove? Because they said that He was alien
from the Father, and a deceiver, and had come to ruin and destroy He telleth
them, "This if nothing else would persuade Me to love you, namely, your
being so beloved by the Father, that I also am beloved by Him, because I die
for you." Besides this He desireth also to prove that other point, that
He came not to the action unwillingly, (for it unwillingly, how could what
was done cause love?) and that this was especially known to the Father. And
if He speaketh as a man, marvel not, for we have often mentioned the cause
of this, and to say again the same things is superfluous and unpleasant.
"I
lay down My life, that I might take it again."
Ver. 18. "No
man taketh it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it
down,
and I
have power to take it again."
Because
they often took counsel to kill Him, He telleth them, "Except
I will, your labor is unavailing." And by the first He proveth the second,
by the Death, the Resurrection. For this is the strange and wonderful thing.
Since both took place in a new way, and beyond ordinary custom. But let us
give heed exactly to what He saith, "I have power to lay down My life." And
who hath not "power to lay down his life"? Since it is in the power
of any that will, to kill himself. But He saith it not so, but how? "I
have in such a way the power to lay it down, that no one can effect this against
My will." And this is a power not belonging to men; for we have no power
to lay it down in any other way than by killing ourselves. And if we fall into
the hands of men who plot against us, and have the power to kill us, we no
longer are free to lay it down or not, but even against our will they take
it from us. Now this was not the case with Christ, but even when others plotted
against Him, He had power not to lay it down. Having therefore said that, "No
man taketh it from Me," He addeth, "I have power to lay down My life," that
is, "I alone can decide as to laying it down," a thing which doth
not rest with us,(1) for many others also are able to take it from us. Now
this He said not at first, (since the assertion would not have seemed credible,)
but when He had received the testimony of facts, and when, having often plotted
against Him, the), had been unable to lay hold on Him, (for He escaped from
their hands ten thousand tithes,) He then saith, "No man taketh it from
me." But if this be true, that other point follows, that He came to death
voluntarily. And if this be true, the next point is also certain, that He can "take
it again" when He will. For if the dying(2) was a greater thing than man
could do, doubt no more about the other. Since the fact that He alone was able
to let go His life, showeth that He was able by the same power to take it again.
Seest thou how from the first He proved the second, and from His death showed
that His Resurrection was indisputable?
"This
commandment have I received of My Father."
What commandment
was this? To die for the world. Did He then wait first to hear, and then
choose, and
had He
need of learning it? Who that had sense would
assert this? But before when He said, "Therefore doth My Father love Me," He
showed that the first motion was voluntary, and removed all suspicion of opposition
to the Father; so here when He saith that He received a commandment from the
Father, He declared nothing save that, "this which I do seemeth good to
Him," in order that when they should slay Him, they might not think that
they had slain Him as one deserted and given up by the Father, nor reproach
Him with such reproaches as they did, "He saved others, himself he cannot
save"; and, "If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross" (Matt.
xxvii. 42, 40); yet the very reason of His not coming down was, that He was
the Son of God.
[3.] Then
test on hearing that, "I have received a command from the Father," thou
shouldest deem that the achievement(3) doth not belong to Him, He hath said
preventing the, "The good Shepherd layeth down His life for the sheep";
showing by this that the sheep were His, and that all which took place was
His achievement, and that He needed no command. For had He needed a commandment,
how could He have said, "I lay it down of Myself"? for He that layeth
it down of Himself needeth no commandment. He also assigneth the cause for
which He doeth this. And what is that? That He is the Shepherd, and the good
Shepherd. Now the good Shepherd needeth no one to arouse him to his duty; and
if this be the case with man, much more is it so with God. Wherefore Paul said,
that "He emptied Himself." (Phil. ii. 7.) So the "commandment" put
here means nothing else, but to show His unanimity with the Father; and if
He speaketh in so humble and human a way, the cause is the infirmity of His
hearers.
Ver. 19. "There
was a division therefore(4) among the Jews.(5) And some(6) said, He hath
a devil
(and is
mad(7)). Others said, These are not the words
of him that hath a devil: can a devil open the eyes of the blind?"
For because
His words were greater than belonged to man, and not of common use, they
said that
He had a devil,
calling Him so now for the fourth time.
For they before had said "Thou hast a devil, who seeketh to kill thee?" (c.
vii. 20); and again, "Said we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and
hast a devil?" (c. viii. 48); and here, "He hath a devil and is mad
why hear ye him?" Or rather we should say, that He heard this not for
the fourth time, but frequently. For to ask, "Said we not well that thou
hast a devil?" is a sign that they had said so not twice or thrice, but
many times. "Others said, These are not the words of him that hath a devil:
can a devil open the eyes of the blind?" For since they could not silence
their opponents by words, they now brought proof from His works. "Certainly
neither are the words those of one that hath a devil, yet if ye are not persuaded
by the words, be ye shamed by the works. For if they are not the acts of one
that hath a devil, and are greater than belong to man, it is quite clear that
they proceed from some divine power." Seest thou the argument? That they
were greater t