Subscribe
to CF
Be
first to know
Read our AAA review
from Catholic Culture
Our Mission
To
bring Jesus Christ; the Way, the Truth and the Life; to all who will follow,
according to scripture and tradition, per the Magisterium
of the Roman Catholic Church.
While you visit!
Listen
to
Radio
For the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. |
COMMENTARY OF
ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM
ON THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
HOMILIES IV TO VII (ACTS 2)
HOMILY IV.
ACTS II. 1, 2.
"And
when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in
one place.
And suddenly
there came a sound from heaven."
DOST thou
perceive the type? What is this Pentecost? The time when the sickle was to
be put to the
harvest,
and the ingathering was made. See now the reality,
when the time was come to put in the sickle of the word: for here, as the sickle,
keen-edged, came the Spirit down. For hear the words of Christ: "Lift
up your eyes," He said, "and look on the fields, for they are white
already to harvest." (John iv. 35.) And again, "The harvest truly
is great, but the laborers are few." (Matt. ix. 38.) But as the first-fruits
of this harvest, He himself took [our nature], and bore it up on high. Himself
first put in the sickle. Therefore(1) also He calls the Word the Seed. "When," it
says, "the day of Pentecost was fully come" (Luke viii. 5, 11): that
is, when at the Pentecost, while about it, in short.(2) For it was essential
that the present events likewise should take place during the feast, that those
who had witnessed the crucifixion of Christ, might also behold these. "And
suddenly there came a sound from heaven." (v. 2.) Why did this not come
to pass without sensible tokens? For this reason. If even when the fact was
such, men said, "They are full of new wine," what would they not
have said, had it been otherwise? And it is not merely, "there came a
sound," but, "from heaven." And the suddenness also startled
them, and(3) brought all together to the spot. "As of a rushing mighty
wind:" this betokens the exceeding vehemence of the Spirit. "And
it filled all the house:" insomuch that those present both believed, and
(Edd. <greek>toutous</greek>) in this manner were shown to be worthy.
Nor is this all; but what is more awful still, "And there appeared unto
them," it says, "cloven tongues like as of fire." (v. 3.) Observe
how it is always, "like as;" and rightly: that you may have no gross
sensible notions of the Spirit. Also, "as it were of a blast:" therefore
it was not a wind. "Like as of fire." For when the Spirit was to
be made known to John, then it came upon the head of Christ as in the form
of a dove: but now, when a whole multitude was to be converted, it is "like
as of fire. And it sat upon each of them." This means, that it remained
and rested upon them." For the sitting is significant of settledness and
continuance.
Was it
upon the twelve that it came? Not so; but upon the hundred and twenty. For
Peter would not
have quoted
to no purpose the testimony of the prophet,
saying, "And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith the Lord God,
I will pour out of My spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters
shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall
dream dreams." (Joel if. 28.) "And they were all filled with the
Holy Ghost." (v. 4.) For, that the effect may not be to frighten only,
therefore is it both "with the Holy Ghost, and with fire. And began to
speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance."' (Matt.
iii. 11.) They receive no other sign, but this first; for it was new to them,
and there was no need of any other sign. "And it sat upon each of them," says
the writer. Observe now, how there is no longer any occasion for that person
to grieve, who was not elected as was Matthias, "And they were all filled," he
says; not merely received the grace of the Spirit, but "were filled. And
began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." It
would not have been said, All, the Apostles also being there present, unless
the rest also were partakers. For were it not so having above made mention
of the Apostles distinctively and by name, he would not now have put them all
in one with the rest. For if, where it was only to be mentioned that they were
present, he makes mention of the Apostles apart, much more would he have done
so in the case here supposed.(1) Observe, how when one is continuing in prayer,
when one is in charity, then it is that the Spirit draws near. It put them
in mind also of another vision: for as fire did He appear also in the bush. "As
the Spirit gave them utterance, <greek>apofqeggesqai</greek>" (Exod.
ii. 2.) For the things spoken by them were <greek>apofqegmata</greek> profound
utterances. "And," it says, "there were dwelling at Jerusalem
Jews, devout men." (v. 5.) The fact of their dwelling there was a sign
of piety: that being of so many nations they should have left country, and
home, and relations, and be abiding there. For, it says, "There were dwelling
at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. Now when this
was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded. (v. 6.)
Since the event had taken place in a house, of course they came together from
without. The multitude was confounded: was all in commotion. They marvelled; "Because
that every man heard them speak in his own language. And they were amazed," it
says, "and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these
which speak Galileans?" (v. 7-13.) They immediately turned their eyes
towards the Apostles. "And how" (it follows) "hear we every
man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites,
and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and
Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene:" mark
how they run from east to west:(2) "and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,
Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works
of God. And, they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another,
What meaneth this? Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine." O
the excessive folly! O the excessive malignity! Why it was not even the season
for that; for it was Pentecost. For this was what made it worse: that when
those were confessing--men that were Jews, that were Romans, that were proselytes,
yea perhaps that had crucified Him--yet these, after so great signs, say, "They
are full of new wine!"
But let
us look over what has been said from the beginning. (Recapitulation.) "And
when the day of Pentecost," etc. "It filled," he says, "the
house." That wind <greek>pnoh</greek> was a very pool of water.
This betokened the copiousness, as the fire did the vehemence. This nowhere
happened in the case of the Prophets: for to uninebriated souls such accesses
are not attended with much disturbance; but "when they have well drunken," then
indeed it is as here, but with the Prophets it is otherwise.(3) (Ez. iii. 3.)
The roll of a book(4) is given him, and Ezekiel ate what he was about to utter. "And
it became in his mouth," is is said, "as honey for sweetness." (And(5)
again the hand of God touches the tongue of another Prophet; but here it is
the Holy Ghost Himself: (Jer. i. 9) so equal is He in honor with the Father
and the Son.) And again, on the other hand, Ezekiel calls it "Lamentations,
and mourning, and woe." (Ez. ii. 10.) To them it might well be in the
form of a book; for they still needed similitudes. Those had to deal with only
one nation, and with their own people; but these with the whole world, and
with men whom they never knew. Also Elisha receives the grace through the medium
of a mantle (2 Kings xiii.); another by oil, as David (2 Sam. xvi. 13); and
Moses by fire, as we read of him at the bush. (Exod. iii. 2.) But in the present
case it is not so; for the fire itself sat upon them. (But wherefore did the
fire not appear so as to fill the house? Because they would have been terrified.)
But the story shows, that it is the same here as there.(1) For you are not
to stop at this, that "there appeared unto them cloven tongues" but
note that they were "of fire." Such a fire as this is able to kindle
infinite fuel. Also, it is well said, Cloven, for they were from one root;
that you may learn, that it was an operation sent from the Comforter.[*]
But observe
how those men also were first shown to be worthy, and then received the Spirit
as worthy.
Thus,
for instance, David:(2) what he did among the sheepfolds,
the same he did after his victory and trophy; that it might be shown how simple
and absolute was his faith. Again, see Moses despising royalty, and forsaking
all, and after forty years taking the lead of the people (Exod. ii. 11); and
Samuel occupied there in the temple (1 Sam. iii. 3); Elisha leaving all (1
Kings xix. 21); Ezekiel again, made manifest by what happened thereafter. s
In this manner, you see, did these also leave all that they had. They learnt
also what human infirmity is, by what they suffered; they learnt that it was
not in vain they had done these good works. (1 Sam. ix. and xi. 6.) Even Saul,
having first obtained witness that he was good, thereafter received the Spirit.
But in the same manner as here did none of them receive. Thus Moses was the
greatest of the Prophets, yet he, when others were to receive the Spirit, himself
suffered diminution.(4) But here it is not so; but just as fire kindles as
many flames as it will, so here the largeness of the Spirit was shown, in that
each one received a fountain of the Spirit; as indeed He Himself had foretold,
that those who believe in Him, should have "a well of water springing
up into everlasting life." (John iv. 14.) And good reason that it should
be so. For they did not go forth to argue with Pharaoh, but to wrestle with
the devil. But the wonder is this, that when sent they made no objections;
they said not, they were "weak in voice, and of a slow tongue." (Exod.
iv. 10.) For Moses had taught them better. They said not, they were too young.
(Jer. i. 6.) Jeremiah had made them wise. And yet they had heard of many fearful
things, and much greater than were theirs of old time; but they feared to object.--And
because they were angels of light, and ministers of things above ["Suddenly
there came from heaven," etc.] To them of old, no one "from heaven" appears,
while they as yet follow after a vocation on earth; but now that Man has gone
up on high,. the Spirit also descends mightily from on high. "As it were
a rushing mighty wind;" making it manifest by this, that nothing shall
be able to withstand them, but they shall blow away all adversaries like a
heap of dust. "And it filled all the house." The house also was a
symbol of the world. "And it sat upon each of them," [etc.] and "the
multitude came together, and were confounded." Observe their piety; they
pronounce no hasty judgment, but are perplexed: whereas those reckless ones
pronounce at once, saying, "These men are full of new wine." Now
it was in order that they might have it in their power,(5) in compliance with
the Law, to appear thrice in the year in the Temple, that they dwelt there,
these "devout men from all nations." Observe here, the writer has
no intention of flattering them. For he does not say that they pronounced any
opinion: but what? "Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came
together, and were confounded." And well they might be; for they supposed
the matter was now coming to an issue against them, on account of the outrage
committed against Christ. Conscience also agitated their souls, the very blood
being yet upon their hands, and every thing alarmed them. "Behold, are
not all these which speak Galileans?" For indeed this was confessed. ["And
how hear we"] so much did the sound alarm them. [" Every man in our
own tongue," etc.] for it found the greater part of the world assembled
there. ["Parthians and Medes," etc.] This nerved the Apostles: for,
what it was to speak in the Parthian tongue, they knew not but now learnt from
what those said. Here is mention made of nations that were hostile to them,
Cretans, Arabians, Egyptians, Persians: and that they would conquer them all
was here made manifest. But as to their being in those countries, they were
there in captivity, many of them: or else, the doctrines of the Law had become
disseminated [among] the Gentiles in those countries.(1) So then the testimony
comes from all quarters: from citizens, from foreigners, from proselytes. "We
do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God." For it
was not only that they spoke (in their tongues), but the things they spoke
were wonderful.[*] Well then might they be in doubt: for never had the like
occurred. Observe the ingenuousness of these men. They were amazed and were
in doubt, saying, "What meaneth this?" But "others mocking said,
'These men are full of new wine'" (John viii. 48), and therefore mocked.
O the effrontery! And what wonder is it? Since even of the Lord Himself, when
casting out devils, they said that He had a devil! For so it is; wherever impudent
assurance exists, it has but one object in view, to speak at all hazards, it
cares not what; not that the man should say something real and relevant to
the matter of discourse, but that he should speak no matter what. [" They
are full of new wine."] Quite a thing of course (is no, it?),(2) a that
men in the midst of such dangers, and dreading the worst, and in such despondency,
have the courage to utter such things! And observe: since this was unlikely;
because they Would not have been drinking much [at that early hour], they ascribe
the whole matter to the quality (of the wine), and say, "They are full" of
it. "But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and
said unto them." In a former place(8) you saw his provident forethought,
here you see his manly courage. For if they were astonished and amazed, was
it not as wonderful that he should be able in the midst of such a multitude
to find language, he, an unlettered and ignorant man? If a man is troubled
when he speaks among friends, much more might he be troubled among enemies
and bloodthirsty men. That they are not drunken, he shows immediately by his
very voice, that they are not beside themselves, as the soothsayers: and this
too, that they were not constrained by some compulsory force. What is meant
by, "with the eleven?" They expressed themselves through one common
voice, and he was the mouth of all. The eleven stood by as witnesses to what
he said. "He lifted up his voice," it is said. That is, he spoke
with great confidence, that they might perceive the grace of the Spirit. He
who had not endured the questioning of a poor girl, now in the midst of the
people, all breathing murder, discourses with such confidence, that this very
thing becomes an unquestionable proof of the Resurrection: in the midst of
men who could deride and make a joke of such things as these! What effrontery,
think you, must go to that! what impiety, what shamelessness!(1) For wherever
the Holy Spirit is present, He makes' men of gold out of men of clay. Look,
I pray you, at Peter now examine well that timid one, and devoid of understanding;
as Christ said, "Are ye also yet without understanding?" (Matt. xv.
16) the man, who after that marvellous confession was called "Satan." (Ib.
xvi. 23.) Consider also the unanimity of the Apostles. They themselves ceded
to him the office of speaking; for it was not necessary that all should speak. "And
he lifted up his voice," and spoke out to them with great boldness. Such
a thing it is to be a spiritual man I Only let us also bring ourselves into
a state meet for the grace from above, and all becomes easy. For as a man of
fire falling into the midst of straw would take no harm, but do it to others:
not he could take any harm, but they, in assailing him, destroy themselves.
For the case here was just as if one carrying hay should attack one bearing
fire: even so did the Apostles encounter these their adversaries with great
boldness.
For what
did it harm them, though they were so great a multitude? Did they not spend
all their rage?
did they
not turn the distress upon themselves? Of
all mankind were ever any so possessed with both rage and terror, as those
became possessed? Were they not in an agony, and were dismayed, and trembled?
For hear what they say, "Do ye wish to bring this man's blood upon us?" (Acts
v. 28.) Did they(2) (the Apostles) not fight against poverty and hunger: against
ignominy and infamy (for they were accounted deceivers): did they not fight.(3)
against ridicule and wrath and mockery?--for in their case the contraries met:
some laughed at them, others punished them;--were they not made a mark for
the wrathful passions, and for the merriment,(4) of whole cities? exposed to
factions and conspiracies: to fire, and sword, and wild beasts? Did not war
beset them from every quarter, in ten thousand forms? And were they any more
affected in their minds by all these things, than they would have been at seeing
them in a dream or in a picture?(5) With bare body they took the field against
all the armed, though against them all men had arbitrary power [against them,
were]: terrors of rulers, force of arms, in cities and strong walls:(6) without
experience, without skill of the tongue, and in the condition of quite ordinary
men, matched against juggling conjurors, against impostors, against the whole
throng of sophists, of rhetoricians, of philosophers grown mouldy in the Academy
and the walks of the Peripatetics, against all these they fought the battle
out. And the man whose occupation bad been about lakes, so mastered them, as
if it cost him not so much ado as even a contest with dumb fishes: for just
as if the opponents he had to outwit were indeed more mute than fishes, so
easily did he get the better of them! And Plato, that talked a deal of nonsense
in his day, is silent now, while this man utters his voice everywhere; not
among his own countrymen alone, but also among Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites,
and in India, and in every part of the earth, and to the extremities of the
world. Where now is Greece, with her big pretentions? Where the name of Athens?
Where the ravings of the philosophers? He of Galilee, he of Bethsaida, he,
the uncouth rustic, has overcome them all. Are you not ashamed--confess it--at
the very name of the country of him who has defeated you? But if you hear his
own name too, and learn that he was called Cephas, much more will you hide
your faces. This, this has undone you quite; because you esteem this a reproach,
and account glibness of tongue a praise, and want of glibness a disgrace. You
have not followed the road you ought to have chosen, but leaving the royal
road, so easy, so smooth, you have trodden one rough, and steep, and laborious.
And therefore you have not attained unto the kingdom of heaven.
Why then,
it is asked, did not Christ exercise His influence upon Plato, and upon Pythagoras?
Because
the
mind of Peter was much more philosophical(1) than
their minds. They were in truth children shifted about on all sides by vain
glory'; but this man was a philosopher, one apt to receive grace. If you laugh
at these words, it is no wonder; for those aforetime laughed, and said, the
men were full of new wine. But afterwards, when they suffered those bitter
Calamities, exceeding all others in misery; when they saw their city falling
in ruins, and the fire blazing, and the walls hurled to the ground, and those
manifold frantic horrors, which no one can find words to express, they did
not laugh then. And you will laugh then, if you have the mind to laugh, when
the time of hell is close at hand, when the fire is kindled for your souls.
But why do I speak of the future? Shall I show you. what Peter is, and what
Plato, the philosopher? Let us for the present examine their respective habits,
let us see what were the pursuits of each. The one wasted his time about a
set of idle and useless dogmas, and philosophical, as he says,(2) that we may
learn that the soul of our philosopher becomes a fly.[*] Most truly said, a
fly! not indeed changed into one, Gut a fly must have entered upon possession
of the soul which dwelt in Plato; for what but a fly is worthy of such ideas!
The man was full of irony, and of jealous feelings against every one else,
as if he made it his ambition to introduce nothing useful, either out of his
own head or other people's. Thus he adopted the metempsychosis from another,
and from himself produced the Republic, in which he enacted those laws full
of gross turpitude. Let the women, he says, be in common, and let the virgins
go naked, and let them wrestle before the eyes of their lovers, and let there
also be common fathers, and let the children begotten be common. But with us,
not nature makes common fathers, but the philosophy of Peter does this; as
for that other, it made away with all paternity.(8) For Plato's system only
tended to make the real father next to unknown, while the false one was introduced.
It plunged the soul into a kind of intoxication and filthy wallowing. Let all,
he says, have intercourse with the women without fear. The reason why I do
not examine the maxims of poets, is, that I may not be charged with ripping
up fables. And yet I am speaking of fables much more ridiculous than even those.
Where have the poets devised aught so portentous as this? But (not to enter
into the discussion of his other maxims), what say you to these--when he equips
the females with arms, and helmets, and greaves, and says that the human race
has no occasion to differ from the canine! Since dogs, he says, the female
and the male, do just the same things in common, so let the women do the same
works as the men, and let all be turned upside down. For the devil has always
endeavored by their means(4) to show that our race is not more honorable than
that of brutes; and, in fact, some have gone to such a pitch of (<greek>kenodoxias</greek> absurdity,
as to affirm that the irrational creatures are endued with reason. And see
in how many various ways he has run riot in the minds of those men! For whereas
their leading men affirmed that our soul passes into flies, and dogs, and brute
creatures; those who came after them, being ashamed of this, fell into another
kind of turpitude, and invested the brute creatures with all rational science,
and made out that the creatures--which were called into existence on our account--are
in all respects more honorable than we! They even attribute to them foreknowledge
and piety. The crow, they say, knows God, and the raven likewise, and they
possess gifts of prophecy, and foretell the future; there is justice among
them, and polity, and laws. Perhaps you do not credit the things I am telling
you. And well may you not, nurtured as you have been with sound doctrine; since
also, if a man were fed with this fare, he would never believe that there exists
a human being who finds pleasure in eating dung. The dog(5) also among them
is jealous, according to Plato. But when we tell them that these things are
fables, and are full of absurdity, 'You do not enter (<greek>enohsate</greek>)
into the higher meaning,' say they. No, we do not enter into this your surpassing
nonsense, and may we never do so: for it requires (of course!(1)) an excessively
profound mind, to inform me, what all this impiety and confusion would be at.
Are you talking, senseless men, in the language of crows, as the children are
wont (in play)? For you are in very deed children, even as they. But Peter
never thought of saying any of these things: he uttered a voice, like a great
light shining out in the dark, a voice which scattered the mist and darkness
of the whole world. Again, his deportment, how gentle it was, how considerate
(<greek>epieikes</greek>); how far above all vainglory; how he
looked towards heaven without all self-elation, and this, even when raising
up the dead! But if it had come to be in the power of any one of those senseless
people (in mere fantasy of course) to do anything like it, would he not straightway
have looked for an altar and a temple to be reared to him, and have wanted
to be equal with the gods? since in fact when no such sign is forthcoming,
they are forever indulging such fantastic conceits. And what, pray you, is
that Minerva of theirs, and Apollo, and Juno? They are different kinds of demons
among them. And there is a king of theirs, who thinks fit to die for the mere
purpose of being accounted equal with the gods. But not so the men here: no,
just the contrary. Hear how they speak on the occasion of the lame man's cure. "Ye
men of Israel, why look ye so earnestly on us, as though by our own power or
holiness we had made him to walk? (ch. iii. 12.) We also are men of like passions
with you. (Ibid. xiv. 14.) But with those, great is the self-elation, great
the bragging; all for the sake of men's honors, nothing for the pure love of
truth and virtue. (<greek>filosofias</greek> <greek>eneken</greek>)
For where an action is done for glory, all is worthless. For though a man possess
all, yet if he have not the mastery over this (lust), he forfeits all claim
to true philosophy, he is in bondage to the more tyrannical and shameful passion.
Contempt of glory; this it is that is sufficient to teach all that is good,
and to banish from the soul every pernicious passion. I exhort you therefore
to use the most strenuous endeavors to pluck out this passion by the very roots;
by no other means can you have good esteem with God, and draw down upon you
the benevolent regard of that Eye which never sleepeth. Wherefore, let us use
all earnestness to obtain the enjoyment of that heavenly influence, and thus
both escape the trial of present evils, and attain unto the future blessings,
through the grace and lovingkindness of our Lord Jesus Christ, with Whom to
the Father and the Holy Ghost be glory, power, honor, now and ever, and to
all ages. Amen.
HOMILY V.
ACTS II. 14.
"Ye
men of Judea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known unto you,
and hearken to
my words."
["Ye men of Judea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem,"] whom the
writer above described as strangers. Here he directs his discourse to those
others, the mockers,(2) and while he seems to reason with those, he sets these
right. For indeed it was divinely ordered that "some mocked," that
he might have a starting-point for his defence, and by means of that defence,
might teach. ["And all ye that dwell in Jerusalem."] It seems they
accounted it a high encomium to dwell in Jerusalem too.(3) "Be this," says
he, "known unto you, and hearken unto my words." In the first instance
he made them more disposed to attend to him. "For not as ye(1) suppose," says
he, "are these drunken." Do you observe the mildness of his defence?
(v. 15.) Although having the greater part of the people on his side, he reasons
with those others gently; first he removes the evil surmise, and then he establishes
his apology. On this account, therefore, he does not say, "as ye mock," or, "as
ye deride," but, "as ye suppose;" wishing to make it appear
that they had not said this in earnest, and for the present taxing them with
ignorance rather than with malice. "For these are not drunken, as ye suppose,
seeing it is but the third hour of the day." And why this? Is it not possible
at the third hour to be drunken? But he did not insist upon this to the letter;
for there was nothing of the kind about them; the others said it only in mockery.(*)
Hence we learn that on unessential points one must not spend many words. And
besides, the sequel is enough to bear him out on this point: so now the discourse
is for all in common. "But this is that which was spoken by the prophet
Joel, And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith the Lord God. (v. 16.
17. Joel ii. 28.) Nowhere as yet the name of Christ, nor His promises but the
promise is that of the Father. Observe the wisdom: observe the considerate
forbearance: (<greek>sugkatabasin</greek>.) He did not pass on
to speak at once of the things relating to Christ; that He had promised this
after His Crucifixion; truly that would have been to upset all. And yet, you
will say, here was sufficient to prove His divinity. True, it was, if believed
(and the very point was that it should be believed); but if not believed, it
would have caused them to be stoned. "And I will pour out of My Spirit
upon all flesh." He offers even to them excellent hopes, if they would
have them. And so far, he does not leave it to be regarded as the exclusive
advantage of himself and his company; which would have made them be looked
upon with an evil eye; thus cutting off all envious feeling. "And your
sons shall prophesy." And yet, he says, not yours this achievement, this
distinction; the gift has passed over to your children. Himself and his company
he calls their sons, and those [whom he is addressing] he calls his and their
fathers. "And your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall
dream dreams; and on My servants and on My handmaidens I will pour out in those
days of My Spirit; and they shall prophesy." So far he shows that he and
his have found favor, in that they had received (<greek>kataxiwqentas</greek>)
[the Spirit]; not so they whom he is addressing; for that they had crucified
[the Lord]. So Christ also, willing to mitigate their wrath, said, "By
whom do your sons cast out devils?" (Matt. xii. 27.) He did not say, My
disciples; for indeed it seemed a flattering mode of expression. And so Peter
also did not say, 'They are not drunk, but speak(2) by the Spirit:' but he
takes refuge with the prophet, and under shelter of him, so speaks. As for
the accusation [of drunkenness], he cleared himself of that by his own assertion;
but for the grace, he fetches the prophet as witness. "I will pour out
of My Spirit upon all flesh." ["And your sons," etc.] To some
the grace was imparted through dreams, to others it was openly poured forth.
For indeed by dreams the prophets saw, and received revelations.
Then he
goes on with the prophecy, which has in it also something terrible. "And
I will show wonders in heaven above, and signs" ["in the earth beneath"].
(v. 19.) In these words he speaks both of the judgment to come, and of the
taking of Jerusalem. "Blood and fire, and vapor of smoke." Observe
how he describes the capture. "The sun shall be turned into darkness,
and the moon into blood." (v. 20.) This results from the (<greek>siaqesews</greek>)
internal affection of the sufferers. It is said, indeed, that many such phenomena
actually did occur in the sky, as Josephus attests. At the same time the Apostle
strikes fear into them, by reminding them of the darkness which had lately
occurred, and leading them to expect things to come. "Before that great
and notable day of the Lord come." For be not confident, he means to say,
because at present you sin with impunity. For these things are the prelude
of a certain great and dreadful day. Do you see how he made their souls to
quake and melt within them, and turned their laughter into pleading for acquittal?(3)
For if these things are the prelude of that day, it follows that the extreme
of danger is impending. But what next? He again lets them take breath, adding, "And
it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord,
shall be saved." (Rom. x. 13.) This is said concerning Christ, as Paul
affirms, but Peter does not venture as yet to reveal this.
Well,
let us look over again what has been said. It is well managed, that as against
men laughing
and mocking,
he starts up and begins with, "Be
this known unto you all and hearken unto my words." But he begins by saying, "Ye
men of Judea." By the expression 'I<greek>oudaioi</greek>,
I take him to mean those that lived in Judea.--And, if you please, let us compare
those expressions in the Gospel, that you may learn what a sudden change has
taken place in Peter. "A damsel," it is written, "came out unto
him, saying, Thou also wast with Jesus of Nazareth." And, says he, "I
know not the Man." And being again questioned, "he began to curse
and to swear." (Matt. xxvi. 69-72.) But see here his boldness, and his
great freedom of speech.--He did not praise those who had said, "We do
hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God;" but by his
severity towards those others, he made these more earnest, and at the same
time his address is clear from all appearance of adulation. And it is well
to remark, on all occasions, however the Apostles may condescend to the level
of their hearers (<greek>sugkatabasis</greek>), their language
is clear from all appearance both of adulation and of insolence: which is a
difficult point to manage.
Now that
these things should have occurred at "the third hour," was
not without cause. For(1) the brightness of this fire is shown at the very
time when people are not engaged in their works, nor at dinner; when it is
bright day, when all are in the market-place. Do you observe also the freedom
which fills his speech? "And hearken to my words." And he added nothing,
but, "This," says he, "is that which was spoken by the prophet
Joel; And it shall come to pass in the last days." He shows, in fact,
that the consummation is nigh at hand, and the words, "In the last days," have
a kind of emphasis. ["I will pour out," etc.] And then, that he may
not seem to limit the privilege to the sons only, he subjoins, "And your
old men shall dream dreams." Mark the sequence. First sons; just as David
said, "Instead of thy fathers, were begotten thy sons." (Ps. xlv.
17.) And again Malachi; "They shall turn the hearts of the fathers to
the children. And on my handmaidens, and on my servants." (Mal. iv. 6.)
This also is a token of excellence, for we have become His servants, by being
freed from sin. And great is the gift, since the grace passes over to the other
sex also, not as of old, it was limited to just one or two individuals, as
Deborah and Huldah.(2) He did not say that it was the Holy Ghost, neither did
he expound the words of the prophet; but he merely brings in the prophecy to
fight its own battle. As yet also he has said nothing about Judas; and yet
it was known to all what a doom and punishment he had undergone; for nothing
was more forcible than to argue with them from prophecy: this was more forcible
even than facts. For when Christ performed miracles, they often contradicted
Him. But when Christ brought forward the prophet, saying, "The Lord said
unto my Lord, Sit Thou on my right hand," they were silent, and "no
man," we read, "was able to answer Him a word." (Ps. xc. 1.)
And on all occasions He Himself also appealed to the Scriptures; for instance, "If
he called them gods to whom the word of God came." (John x. 35.) And in
many places one may find this. On this account here also Peter says, "I
will pour out of my spirit upon all flesh;" that is, upon the Gentiles
also. But he does not yet reveal this, nor give interpretations; indeed,(3)
it was better not to do so (as also this obscure saying, "I will show
wonders in heaven above," put them the more in fear because it was obscure.)
And it would have been more an offence, had it been interpreted from the very
first. Then besides, even as plain, he passes over it, wishing to make them
regard it as such. But after all, he does interpret to them anon, when he discourses
to them upon the resurrection, and after he has paved the way by his discourse.
(infra v. 39.) For(4) since the good things were not sufficient to allure them,
[it is added, "And I will show wonders, etc."]. Yet(1) this has never
been fulfilled. For none escaped then [in that former judgment], but now the
faithful did escape, in Vespasian's time. And this it is that the Lord speaks
of, "Except those days had been shortened, not all flesh should be saved."--["Blood,
and fire, and vapor of smoke."] (Matt. xxiv. 22.) The worst to come first;(2)
namely, the inhabitants to be taken, and then the city to be razed and burnt.
Then he dwelt upon the metaphor, bringing before the eyes of the hearers the
overthrow and the taking. "The sun shall be turned into darkness, and
the moon into blood." What means, the moon turned into blood? It denotes
the excess of the slaughter. The language is fraught with helpless dismay.
(supra p. 32.) "And it shall come to pass, every one who shall call upon
the name of the Lord shall be saved. Every one," he says: though he be
priest (but he does not vet reveal the meaning), though bond, though free.
For(3) there is no male nor female in Christ Jesus, no bond, no free. (Gal.
iii. 28.) Well may it be so, for all these are but shadow. For if in king's
palaces there is no high-born nor low-born, but each appears according to his
deeds; and in art, each is shown by his works; much more in that school of
wisdom (<greek>qilosoqia</greek>). "Every one who shall invoke." Invoke:
not any how, for it is written, "Not every one that saith unto Me, Lord,
Lord:" but with (<greek>diaqesews</greek>) inward earnest
affection, with a life more than commonly good, with the confidence which is
meet. Thus far, however, he makes the discourse light, by introducing that
which relates to faith, and that terrible which relates to the punishment.(4)
For in the invocation is the salvation.
What,
I pray you, is this you say? Do you talk of salvation for them after the
Cross? Bear with me
a little.
Great is the mercy of God. And this very
fact does, no less than the resurrection, prove him to be God, yea, no less
than His miracles--the fact that He calls these to Him. For surpassing goodness
is, above all things, peculiarly God's own. Therefore also He says, "None
is good save one, that is, God." (Luke xviii. 19.) Only let us not take
this goodness for an occasion of negligence. For He also punishes as God. In
fact, the very punishments here spoken of, He brought them to pass, even He
who said, "Every one who shall call on the name of the Lord, shall be
saved." I speak of the fate of Jerusalem;(*) that intolerable punishment:
of which I will tell you some few of the particulars, useful to us in our contest,
both with the Marcionites and many other heretics. For, since they distinguish
between Christ a good God, and that evil God [of the Old Testament], let us
see who it was that effected these things. The evil God, taking vengeance for
Christ? or not so? How then alien to Him? But was it the good God? Nay, but
it is demonstrated that both the Father and the Son did these things. The Father
in many places; for instance, when He says in the parable of the vineyard,(5)
["He will miserably destroy those wicked husbandmen" (Matt. xxi.
41); again in the parable of the marriage feast, the King is said] to send
His armies (ib. xxii. 7): and the Son, when He says, "But those Mine enemies,
which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them
before Me." (Luke xix. 27.) * * * .(6) And they sent, saying, We will
not have Thee to reign over us. Would you like then to hear the things which
actually came to pass? Moreover, Christ Himself also speaks of the future tribulations,
than which never any thing more dreadful came to pass; never any thing more
ruthless, my beloved, than the deeds then done!(7) And He Himself declared
it. For what could you wish to see more grievous than these? * * *--probed
them with their daggers!(1) * * * But shall I relate to you the shocking case
of the woman, that tragic tale? * * * (Joseph. B. J. vi. 3. 4. Did not the
actual events cast all misery into the shade? But shall I tell you of famines
and pestilences? One might speak of horrors without number: nature was unknown;
law unknown; they outdid wild beasts in ferocity. True, these miseries came
by the fate of wars; but because God, because Christ so willed it to be. These
facts will apply both against the Marcionites and against those who do not
believe that there is a hell: for they are sufficient to silence their impudence.
Are not these calamities more severe than the Babylonian?(2) Are not these
sufferings more grievous than the famines of that time? Yes, for ["never
was the like from the beginning of the world"] "no, nor ever shall
be such." (Matt. xxiv. 21.) And this was Christ's own declaration. In
what sense then, think ye, is it said that Christ remitted them their sin?(3)
Perhaps it seems a commonplace question: but do ye solve it.--It is not possible
to show anywhere, even in fiction, any thing like what the reality was here.
And had it been a Christian that wrote this history, the matter might be regarded
with suspicion: but if he was a Jew, and a Jewish zealot, and after the Gospel,
how can the meaning of the facts be otherwise than palpable to all men? For
you will see the man, how, everywhere, he always extols the concerns of the
Jews.--There is therefore a hell, O man! and God is good.--Aye, did you shudder
at hearing these horrors? But these, which take place here, are nothing in
comparison with what shall be in that world. Once more I am compelled to seem
harsh, disagreeable, stern. But what can I do? I am set to this: just as a
severe schoolmaster is set to be hated by his scholars: so are we. For would
it not be strange indeed, that, while those who have a certain post assigned
them by kings do that which is appointed them, however disagreeable the task
may be, we, for fear of your censure, should leave our appointed task undone?
Another has a different work. Of you, many have it for their work, to show
mercy, to act humanely, to be pleasant and agreeable to the persons to whom
you are benefactors. But to those to whom we do good, we seem stern and severe,
troublesome and disagreeable. For we do good, not by the pleasure we give,
but by the pain we inflict. So it is also with the physician: though he indeed
is not excessively disagreeable, for the benefit afforded by his art is had
immediately; ours hereafter. So again the magistrate is odious to the disorderly
and seditious; so the legislator is vexatious to them for whom he makes laws.
But not so he that invites to enjoyment, not so he that prepares public festivities
and entertainments, and puts all the people in garlands: no, these are men
that win acceptance, feasting, as they do, whole cities with all sorts of spectacles;
contributing largely, bearing all the cost. And therefore those whom they have
treated, requite them for these enjoyments with words of welcome and benediction,
with hanging (<greek>parapetasmata</greek>) of tapestries, and
a blaze of lamps, and with wreaths, and boughs, and brilliant garments. Whereas,
at the sight of the physician, the sick become sad and downcast: at sight of
the magistrate, the rioters become subdued: no running riot then, no gambolling,
except when he also goes over into their ranks.(4) Let us see, then, which
render the best service to their cities; those who provide these festivities,
and banquetings, and expensive entertainments, and manifold rejoicings; or
those who restrain all those doings, bearing before them stocks, scourges,
executioners, dreaded soldiers, and a voice fraught with much terror: and issuing
orders, and making men hang down their heads, and with the rod dispersing the
idlers in the market-place. Let us see, I say; these are the disagreeable,
those the beloved: let us see where the gain rests. (<greek>lhlei</greek>.)
What comes then of your pleasure-givers? A kind of frigid enjoyment, lasting
till the evening, and to-morrow vanished; mirth ungoverned, words unseemly
and dissolute. And what of these? Awe, sobriety, subdued thoughts; reasonableness
of mind, an end of idleness; a curb on the passions within; a wall of defence,
next to God,(1) against assailants from without. It is by means of these we
have each our property but by those ruinous festivities we dissipate it. Robbers
indeed have not invaded it, but vainglory together with pleasure acts the part
of robber. Each sees the robber carrying off everything before his eyes, and
is delighted at it! A new fashion of robbery, this, to induce people to be
glad when one is plundering them! On the other part, there is nothing of the
kind: but God, as the common Father, has secured us as by a wall against all
[depredators], both seen and unseen.(2) For, "Take heed," saith He, "that
ye do not your alms before men." (Matt. vi. 1.) The soul learns from the
one, [excess;(3) from the other] to flee injustice. For injustice consists
not merely in grasping at more wealth than belongs to us, but in giving to
the belly more than its needful sustenance, in carrying mirth beyond its proper
bounds, and causing it to run into frantic excesses. From the one, it learns
sobriety; from the other, unchastity. For it is unchastity, not merely to have
carnal intercourse with women, but even to look upon a woman with unchaste
eyes. From the one, it learns modesty; from the other, conceited self-importance.
For, "All things," says the Apostle, "are lawful for me, but
not all things expedient." (1 Cor. vi. 12.) From the one, decent behavior;
from the other unseemliness. For, as to the doings in the theatres, I pass
these. But to let you see that it is not even a pleasure either, but a grief,
show me, but a single day after the festival, both those who spent their money
in giving it, and those who were feasted with spectacles: and you shall see
them all looking dejected enough, but most of all him, your (<greek>ekeinon</greek>)
famous man that has spent his money for it. And this is but fair: for, the
day before, he delighted the common man, and the common man indeed was in high
good humor and enjoyment, and rejoiced indeed in the splendid garment, but
then not having the use of it, and seeing himself stripped of it, he was grieved
and annoyed; and wanted to be the great man, seeing even his own enjoyment
to be small compared with his.(4) Therefore, the day after, they change places,
and now he, the great man, gets the larger share in the dejection.
Now if
in worldly matters, amusements are attended with such dissatisfaction, while
disagreeable things
are so
beneficial, much more does this hold in things
spiritual. Why is it that no one quarrels with the laws, but on the contrary
all account that matter a common benefit? For indeed not strangers from some
other quarter, nor enemies of those for whom the laws are made, came and made
these orders, but the citizens themselves, their patrons, their benefactors:
and this very thing, the making of laws, is a token of beneficence and good-will.
And yet the laws are full of punishment and restraint, and there is no such
thing as law without penalty and coercion. Then is it not unreasonable, that
while the expositors of those laws are called deliverers, benefactors, and
patrons, we are considered troublesome and vexatious if we speak of the laws
of God? When we discourse about hell, then we bring forward those laws: just
as in the affairs of the world, people urge the laws of murder, highway robbery,
and the like, so do we the penal laws: laws, which not man enacted, but the
Only-Begotten Son of God Himself. Let him that hath no mercy, He says, be punished
(Matt. xviii. 23); for such is the import of the parable. Let him that remembereth
injuries, pay the last penalty. Let him that is angry without cause, be cast
into the fire. Let him that reviles, receive his due in hell. If you think
these laws which you hear strange, be not amazed. For if Christ was not intended
to make new laws, why did He come? Those other laws are manifest to us; we
know that the murderer and adulterer ought to be punished. If then we were
meant only to be told the same things over again, where was the need of a heavenly
Teacher? Therefore He does not say, Let the adulterer be punished, but, whoso
looketh on with unchaste eyes. And where, and when, the man will receive punishment,
He there tells us. And not in fine public monuments, nor yet somewhere out
of sight,(1) did He deposit His laws; not pillars of brass did He raise up,
and engrave letters thereon, but twelve souls raised He up for us, the souls
of the Apostles, and in their minds has He by the Spirit inscribed this writing.
This cite we to you. If this was authorized to Jews, that none might take refuge
in the plea of ignorance, much more is it to us. But should any say, "I
do not hear, therefore have no guilt," on this very score he is most liable
to punishment. For, were there no teacher, it would be possible to take refuge
in this plea; but if there be, it is no longer possible. Thus see how, speaking
of Jews, the Lord deprives them of all excuse; "If I had not come and
spoken unto them, they had not had sin:" (John xv. 22): and Paul again, "But
I say, have they not heard? Nay, but into all the earth went forth their sound." (Rom.
x. 18.) For then there is excuse, when there is none to tell the man; but when
the watchman sits there, having this as the business of his life, there is
excuse no longer. Nay, rather, it was the will of Christ, not that we should
look only upon these written pillars, but that we should ourselves be such.
But since we have made ourselves unworthy of the writing, at least let us look
to those. For just as the pillars threaten others, but are not themselves obnoxious
to punishment, nor yet the laws, even so the blessed Apostles. And observe;
not in one place only stands this pillar, but its writing is carried round
about in all the world. Whether you go among the Indians, you shall hear this:
whether into Spain, or to the very ends of the earth, there is none without
the hearing, except it be of his own neglect. Then be not offended, but give
heed to the things spoken, that ye may be able to lay hold upon the works of
virtue, and attain unto the eternal blessings in Christ Jesus our Lord, with
Whom to the Father and Holy Ghost together be glory, power, honor, now and
ever, world without end. Amen.
HOMILY VI.
ACTS II. 22.
"Ye
men of Israel, hear these my words."
["YE men of Israel"]: it is not for flattery that he uses this term;
but, as he has borne hard upon them, he relaxes a little, and puts them in
mind of their great ancestor(2) [Israel]. Here again he begins with an introduction,
that they may not become excited, now that he is going to make express mention
to them of Jesus: for in what preceded, there was no reason why they should
be excited, while the Prophet was the subject of discourse: but the name of
Jesus would have given offence at the very outset.--And he does not say, "Do
as I bid you," but, Hear; as being not at all exacting. And observe how
he forbears to speak of the high matters, and begins with the very low: "Jesus," he
says: and then straightway mentions the place He belonged to, being one which
was held in mean estimation: "Jesus of Nazareth": and does not say
anything great about Him, nor even such as one would say about a Prophet, so
far: "Jesus," he says, "of Nazareth, a man proved (to be) from
God among you." Observe; what great matter was this, to say that He was
sent from God?(8) For this was the point which on all occasions both He and
John and the Apostles were studious to show. Thus hear John saying: "The
same said unto me On whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and abiding
on him, this is He." (John i. 33.) But Christ Himself does this to an
extreme; Of Myself I am not come, He sent Me. (ib. vii. 28.) And everywhere
in the Scriptures this seems the point most studiously insisted upon. Therefore
also this holy leader of the blessed company, the lover of Christ, the good
shepherd, the man put in trust with the keys of heaven, the man who received
the Spiritual Wisdom, when he has first subdued the Jews by fear; and has shown
what great things have been vouchsafed to the disciples, and what a right they
have to be believed, then first proceeds to speak concerning Him. Only think
what boldness it was to say it, in the midst of the murderers--that He is risen!
And yet he does not all at once say, He is risen; but what?--" He came," says
he, "from God: this is manifest by the signs which"--he does not
yet say, Jesus Himself wrought: but what?--"which God wrought by Him in
the midst of you." He calls themselves as witnesses. "A man proved
(to be sent) from God among you, by miracles and wonders and signs, which God
wrought by him in the midst of you, as also ye yourselves know." Then,
having fallen upon the mention of that their sacrilegious outrage, observe
how he endeavors to quit them of the crime: "Him," he says, "being
by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God delivered up": (v.
23) [adding however,] "ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified
and slain:" for though it was predetermined, still they were murderers.(1)
["By the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God:"] all but
using the same words as Joseph did; just as he said to his brethren; "Be
not angry one with another by the way: God sent me hither." (Gen. xlv.
5, 24.) It is God's doing. "What of us, then?" (it might be said,) "it
was even well done on our part." That they may not say this, therefore
it is that he adds, "By wicked hands ye have crucified and slain."(*)
Here then he hints at Judas; while at the same time he shows them that it was
not from any strength of theirs, and would not have been, if He had not Himself
permitted it: it was God that delivered Him up. He has transferred the evil
entire upon the head of Judas, now already parted from them; for he it was
that delivered Him over to them by the kiss. Or, "By wicked hands," refers
to the soldiers: for neither is it simply, "Ye have slain," but,
By wicked men ye have done this.(2) And observe how everywhere they make it
of great importance that the Passion should first be confessed. WHOM GOD RAISED
UP (v. 24), says he. This was the great thing; and observe how he sets it in
the middle of his discourse: for the former matters had been confessed; both
the miracles and the signs and the slaying--"Whom God," says he, "raised
up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that He should
be kept in its power." It is something great and sublime that he has hinted
at here. For the expression, "It was not possible," even itself is
that of one assigning something.(3) It shows that death itself in holding Him
had pangs as in travail, and was sore bestead:(*) whereas, by pains, or, travail-pangs,
of death, the Old Testament means danger and disaster: and that He so rose
as never more to die. For the assertion, "Seeing that it was not possible
that He should be holden of it," means this, that His rising was not common
to the rest. Then, however, before their thoughts can enter at all into his
meaning, he brings David upon them, an authority which sets aside all human
reasoning. "For David saith (with reference) to Him." (v. 25.) And
observe how, once more, the testimony is lowly. For therefore he begins the
citation further up, with the matters of lowlier import therefore(1) was death
not in the number of grievous things [because], says he, "I foresaw the
Lord always before my face, that He is on my right hand that I should not be
moved:" (v. 25-27) and," that Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell." Then,
having finished the citation from the Prophet, he adds; "Men and brethren." (v.
29.) When he is about to say anything great, he uses this opening address,
to rouse and to conciliate them. "Let me be allowed," he says, "to
speak freely to you of the patriarch David." Remarkable lowliness, in
a case where he was giving no hurt, nor was there any reason why the hearers
should be angry. For he did not say, This is not said concerning David, but
concerning the Christ. But in another point of view: by his reverential expression
towards the blessed David, he awed them; speaking of an acknowledged fact as
if it were a bold thing to say, and therefore begging them to pardon him for
saying it. And thereupon his expression is not simply "concerning David," but "concerning
the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried:" he does not also
say, "and is not risen again," but in another way (though this too
would have been no great thing to say), "And his sepulchre is with us
unto this day," he has said what comes to the same thing. Then--and even
so he does not come to the mention of Christ, but what next?--he goes on with
his encomium upon David, "Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that
with an oath God had sworn unto him." (v. 30.) But this he says, that
were it but on account of the honor shown to David, and the descent from him,
they may accept what is said concerning Christ's resurrection, as seeing that
it would be an injury to the prophecy, and a derogating from (<greek>ths</greek> <greek>eis</greek> <greek>autous</greek> <greek>timht</greek>)
their honor, if this were not the fact. "And knowing," he says, "that
with an oath God had sworn unto him"--he does not say simply "promised"--"of
the fruit of his loins after the flesh to raise up Christ, to seat Him upon
his throne." Observe how he has again only hinted at what is sublime.
For now that he has soothed them with his expression, he confidently adds this:
The prophet [saith it] "of His resurrection, that neither was His soul
left in hell, nor did His flesh see corruption." (v. 31.) This again is
wonderful: it shows that His resurrection was not like that of other men. For
though death laid hold on Him, yet it did not its own work then.--And, as regards
the sin, he has spoken of that, covertly and darkly; of the punishment, he
forbore to add anything; but that they had slain Him, this he has spoken out;
for the rest he now comes to the sign given by God. And when it is once proved,
that He, the slain, was just, was dear to God, then, though thou be silent
of the punishment, be sure that he which did the sin will condemn himself more
than ever thou canst condemn him: So then, that he refers all to the Father,
is in order that they may receive what is said: and that assertion, "Not
possible," he fetches in from the prophecy. Well then, let us again look
over what has been said.
"Jesus of Nazareth, a man proved (to be sent) from God unto you." (Recapitulation
of v. 22-31): one, of whom, by reason of His works, there can be no doubt;
but who, on the contrary, is demonstrated. Thus also Nicodemus said, "No
man can do these miracles which Thou doest--By miracles, and wonders, and signs
which God wrought by Him in the midst of you" (John iii. 2): not secretly.
Setting out from facts notorious to those whom he was addressing, he then comes
to things hidden. Thereupon [in saying, "By the determinate counsel and
foreknowledge of God,"] (v. 23) he shows that it was not because they
had the power to do it, and that there was a wisdom and a Divine arrangement
in the event, seeing it was from God He rapidly passes over the unpleasant
part, [adding, "Whom God raised up," etc.] (v. 24). For it is always
a point of great importance with them to show that He was once dead. Though
ye should deny it, says he, (<greek>ekeinoi</greek>) those (present)
will bear witness to the fact. ["Having loosed the pangs of death."]
He that gives Death trouble, may much more give trouble to them that crucified
Him: however, nothing of the kind is here said, as that He had power to slay
you. Meanwhile,(1) let us also learn thus to hold. For one that is in pain
like a woman in travail, does not hold the thing held, and is not active but
passive; and makes haste to cast it off. And it is well said: "For David
saith in reference to him" (v. 25); that you may not refer that saying
to the Prophet.--["Therefore being a Prophet, and knowing," etc.]
(v. 30, 31.) Do you observe how he now interprets the prophecy, and does not(2)
give it bare of comment? How did He "seat Him upon" David's "throne?" For
the kingdom after the Spirit is in heaven. Observe how, along with the resurrection,
he has also declared the kingdom in the fact of His rising again. He shows
that the Prophet was under constraint: for the prophecy was concerning Him.
Why does he say, not, Concerning His kingdom (it was a great matter), but "Concerning
His resurrection?" And how did He seat Him upon his (David's) throne?
Why, He reigns as King over Jews also, yea, what is much more, over them that
crucified Him. "For His flesh saw no corruption." This seems to be
less than resurrection, but it is the same thing.
"This Jesus"--observe how he does not call Him otherwise--"hath
God raised up; whereof all we are witnesses. Being therefore by the right hand
of God exalted" (v. 33, 34): again he takes refuge with the Father, and
yet it had been enough to say what precedes: but he knows what a great point
this is. Here he has hinted at the Ascension also, and that Christ is in heaven:
but neither does he say this openly. "And having received," says
he, "the promise of the Holy Ghost." Observe how, in the beginning
of his discourse, he does not say that Jesus Himself had sent It, but the Father:
now, however, that he has mentioned His signs and the things done to Him by
the Jews, and has spoken of His resurrection, he boldly introduces what he
has to say about these matters, again adducing themselves as witnesses by both
senses: ["He hath shed forth this, which ye do see and hear."] And
of the resurrection he has made continual mention, but of their outrageous
deed he has spoken once for all. "And having received the promise of the
Holy Ghost," This again is great. "The promise," he says; because
[promised] before His Passion. Observe how he now makes it all His ["He
hath poured forth this"], covertly making a great point. For if it was
He that poured it forth, it is of Him that the Prophet has spoken above, "In
the last days I. will pour forth of My Spirit on My Servants, and on Mine handmaids,
and I will do wonders in the heaven above. (supra, v. 17.) Observe what he
secretly puts into it! But then, because it was a great thing, he again veils
it with the expression of "His having received of the Father." He
has spoken of the good things fulfilled, of the signs; has said, that He is
king, the point that touched them; has said, that it is He that gives the Spirit.
(Arist. Rhet. 1, 3.) (For, however much a person may say, if it does not issue
in something advantageous, he speaks to no purpose.) Just as John: "The
same," says he, "shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost." (Matt.
iii. 11.) And it shows that the Cross not only did not make Him less, but rendered
Him even more illustrious, seeing that of old God promised it to Him, but now
has given it. Or fit may be], "the promise" which He promised to
us. He so foreknew it about to be, and has given it to us greater after the
resurrection. And, "hath poured it out," he says; not(3) requiring
worthiness: and not simply gave, but with abundance. Whence(1) does this appear?
Henceforth after the mention of His giving the Spirit, he confidently speaks
also of His ascension into heaven; and not only so, but again adducing the
witness, and reminding them of that Person concerning Whom Christ once spake.
(Matt. xxii. 43) "For not David," says he "ascended into the
heavens. (v. 34.) Here he no longer speaks in lowly phrase,(2) having the confidence
which results from the things said nor does he say, "Be it permitted me
to speak," or the like: "But he saith himself; The Lord said unto
my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool." Now
if He be David's Lord, much more shall they not disdain Him. "Sit thou
on My right hand;" he has set the whole matter here; "until I make
Thine enemies Thy footstool:" here also he has brought upon them a great
terror, just as in the beginning he showed what He does to His friends, what
to his enemies. And again, as to the act of subjugation, not to provoke unbelief,
he ascribes it to the Father. Since then these are great things that he has
uttered, he again brings his discourse down to lowly matters. "Let therefore," he
says, "the whole house of Israel know assuredly: i.e. question ye not,
nor doubt ye: then also in the tone of command it follows; "that God hath
made Him both Lord--" this he says from David-- "and Christ," (v.
36), this from the Psalm:(3) For when it would have been rightly concluded, "Let
therefore the whole house of Israel know assuredly that" He sitteth on
the right hand of God, this, which would have been great, he forbears, and
brings in a different matter which is much more humble, and the expression "Hath
made;" i.e. hath ordained: so that there is nothing about (<greek>ousiwsis</greek>)
communication of substance here, but the expression relates to this which has
been mentioned. "Even this Jesus, Whom ye crucified." He does well
to end with this, thereby agitating their minds. For when he has shown how
great it is, he has then exposed their daring deed, so as to show it to be
greater, and to possess them with terror. For men are not so much attracted
by benefits as they are chastened by fear.(*)
But the
admirable and great ones, and beloved of God, need none of these motives:
men, such as
was Paul: not
of the kingdom, not of hell, made he account. For
this is indeed to love Christ, this to be no hireling, nor to reckon it a matter
of trafficking and trading, but to be indeed virtuous, and to do all for the
love of God. (Rom. ix. 3.) Then what tears does it not deserve, when, owing
so large a measure, we do not even like traders seek the kingdom of heaven!
He promises us so great things, and not even so is He worthy to be heard? What
can come up to this enmity!(4) And yet, they are mad after money-making, though
it be with enemies, though it be with slaves, though it be with persons most
hostile to them, that they come in contact, though it be with persons utterly
evil, if only they expect that they shall be enabled by their means to make
money, they will do everything, will flatter, and be obsequious, and make themselves
slaves, and will esteem them more to be revered than all men, to get some advantage
out of them: for the hope of money does not allow them to give a thought to
any such considerations as these. But the Kingdom is not so powerful as money
is; nay, rather, not in the smallest proportion as powerful. For(5) it is no
ordinary Being that promises: but this is greater than even the Kingdom itself
that we receive it 'from such a Giver! But now the case is the same as if a
king, wishing, after ten thousand other benefits, to make us his heirs and
coheirs with his son [should be despised]: while some captain of a band of
robbers, who has done ten thousand wrongs to us and to our parents, and is
himself fraught with ten thousand wickednesses, and has utterly marred our
honor and our welfare, should, on presenting a single penny, receive our worship.
God promises a Kingdom, and is despised: the Devil helps us to hell, and he
is honored! Here God, there Devil. But let us see the difference of the tasks
enjoined. For if there were none of these considerations in the case: if it
were not, here God, there Devil; not, here one helping to a kingdom, there
to a hell: the nature itself of the tasks enjoined were sufficient to induce
us to comply with the former For what does each enjoin? The one,(1) the things
which make glorious; the other the things which put to shame: one, the things
which involve in ten thousand calamities and disgraces; the other, the things
which have with them abundant refreshment. For look: the one saith, "Learn
ye of Me, for I am meek and lowly of heart, and ye shall find rest unto your
souls." (Matt. xi. 29): the other saith, Be thou savage, and ungentle,
and passionate, and wrathful, and more a wild beast than a man. Let us see
which is more useful, which, I pray you, more profitable. "Speak not of
this," say you.(2) * * * But consider that he is the devil: above all
indeed, if that be shown: there is need also to undergo toils, and, on the
other hand, the prize of victory will be greater. For not he that enjoins easy
tasks is the kind (<greek>khsemwn</greek>)benefactor, but he that
enjoins what is for our good. Since fathers also enjoin disagreeable tasks;
but for this(8) they are fathers: and so again do masters to slaves: but kidnappers
and destroyers (<greek>lumepnes</greek>) on the other hand, do
just the reverse. And(4) yet that the commands of Christ are attended with
a pleasure, is manifest from that saying. For to what sort do you take the
passionate man to belong, and to what the forbearing and meek? Does not the
soul of the (<greek>ekeinou</greek>) one(5) seem to be in a kind
of solitary retreat, enjoying exceeding quiet; while that of (<greek>toutou</greek>)
the other is like a market-place and tumult and the midst of cities, where
great is the clamor of those :going out, the noise of camels, mules, asses:
of men shouting loud to those that meet them, that they may not be trodden
under foot: and again, of silver-beaters, of braziers, of men thrusting and
pushing this way and that and some overborne, some overbearing? But the soul
of (<greek>toutou</greek>) the former is like some mountain-top,
with its delicate air, its pure sunshine, its limpid gushing fountains, its
multitude of charming flowers, while the vernal meads and gardens put on their
plumage of shrubs and flowers, and glance with rifling waters: and if any sound
is heard there, it is sweet, and calculated to affect the ear with a sense
of much delight. For either the warbling birds perch on the outermost spray
of the branching trees, and cicadas, nightingales and swallows, blended in
one harmony, perform a kind of concerted music; or the zephyr gently stirring
the leaves, draws whistling tones from pines and firs, resembling oft the notes
of the swan: and roses, violets, and other flowers, gently swayed, and (<greek>kuanizonta</greek>)
dark-dimpling, show like a sea just rippled over with gentle undulations. Nay,
many are the images one might find. Thus, when one looks at the roses, one
shall fancy that he beholds in them the rainbow; in the violets a waving sea;
in the lilies, the sky. But(6) not by the spectacle alone, and the beholding,
does such an one then cause delight: but also in the very body of him that
looks to the meadow, rather it refreshes him, and causes him to breathe freely,
so that he thinks himself more in heaven than on earth. There is withal a sound
of a different kind, when water from the mountain-steep, borne by its own force
through ravines gently plashes over its pebbly bed with lulling noise, and
so relaxes our frame with the pleasurable sensations, as quickly to draw over
our eyes the soft languor of slumber. You have heard the description with pleasure:
perhaps also it has made you enamored of solitude. But sweeter far than this
solitude is the soul * * of the long-suffering. For it was not for the sake
of describing a meadow, nor for the sake of making a display of language, that
we have broached this similitude: but the object was, that, seeing how great
is the delight of the long suffering, and how, by converse with a long suffering
man, one would be far more both delighted and benefited, than by frequenting
such spots, ye may follow after such men. For when not even a breath of violence
proceeds from such a soul, but mild and engaging words, then indeed does that
gentle softness of the zephyr find its counterpart: entreaties also, devoid
of all arrogance, but forming the resemblance to those winged warblers,--how
is not this far better? For not the body is fanned by the soft breeze of speech;
no, it refreshes our souls(1) heated and glowing. A physician, by ever so great
attention, could not so speedily rid a man of the fever, as a patient man would
cool, by the breath of his own words, a person who was passionate and burning
with wrath. And why do I speak of a physician? Not even iron, made red-hot
and dipped into water, so quickly parts with its heat, as does the passionate
man when he comes in contact with the soul of the long-suffering. But as, if
it chance that singing birds find their way into the market, they go for nothing
there, just so is it with our precepts when they light upon souls addicted
to wrathful passions. Assuredly, sweeter is gentleness than bitterness and
frowardness. --Well, but the one was God's bidding, the other the devil's.
Do you see that it was not for nothing that I said, even if there were no devil
or God in the case, the things enjoined would be enough in themselves to (<greek>aposthsai</greek>)
revolt us? For the one is both agreeable to himself, and serviceable to others,
the other displeasing to himself, and hurtful to others. Nothing is more unpleasant
than a man in a passion, nothing more noisome, more odious, more shocking,
as also nothing more pleasing than one who knows not what it is to be in a
passion. Better dwell with a wild beast than with a passionate man. For the
beast, when once tamed, abides by its law; but the man, no matter how often
you have tamed him, again turns wild, unless(2) however he should of himself
settle down into some such habit (of gentleness). For as a bright sunny day
and winter with all its gloom, so are the soul of the angry and that of the
gentle. However, let us at present look not to the mischievous consequences
resulting to others, but to those which affect the persons themselves: though
indeed it is also no slight mischief (to one's self) to cause ill to another,
for the present, however, let that be the consideration. What executioner with
his lash can so lacerate the ribs, what red-hot lancets (<greek>obeliskoi</greek>)
ever so pierced the body, what madness can so dispossess a man of his natural
reason, as anger and rage do,? I know many instances of persons engendering
diseases by giving loose to anger: and the worst of fevers are precisely these.
But if they so injure the body, think of the soul. For do not argue that you
do not see the mischief, but rather consider, if that which is the recipient
of the malignant passion is so hurt, what must be the hurt sustained by that
which engenders it! Many have lost their eyes, many have fallen into most grievous
disease. Yet he that bears bravely, shall endure all things easily. But, however,
both such are the troublesome tasks the devil enjoins, and the wages he assigns
us for these is hell. He is both devil and foe to our salvation, and we rather
do his bidding than Christ's, Saviour as He is, and Benefactor and Defender,
and speaking as He does such words, which are both sweeter, and more reverend,
and more profitable and beneficial, and are both to ourselves and to those
who live in our company the greatest of blessings. Nothing worse than anger,
my beloved, nothing worse than unseasonable wrath. It will not have any long
delay; it is a quick, sharp passion. Many a time has a mere word been blurted
out in anger, which needs for its curing a whole lifetime, and a deed been
done which was the ruin of the man for life. For the worst of it is this, that
in a little moment, and by one act, and by a single word, full oft has it cast
us out from the possession of eternal good, and brought to nought a world of
pains. Wherefore I beseech you to do all you can to curb this savage beast.
Thus far, however, I have spoken concerning meekness and wrath; if one should
take in hand to treat of other opposites, as covetousness and the mad passion
for glory, contrasted with contempt of wealth and of glory; intemperance with
sobriety; envy with benevolence; and to marshal them each against its opposite,
then one would know how great the difference. Behold how from the very things
enjoined it is plainly shown, that the one master is God, the other the devil!
Why then, let us do God's bidding, and not cast ourselves into bottomless pits;
but while there is time, let us wash off all that defiles the soul, that we
may attain unto the eternal blessings, through the grace and mercy of our Lord
Jesus Christ, with Whom to the Father and Holy Ghost together be glory, power,
honor, now and ever, and world without end. Amen.
HOMILY VII.
ACTS II. 37.
"Now
when they heard these words (E. V. 'this,') they were pricked in their heart,
and said unto
Peter
and to the rest of the Apostles, Men and brethren,
what shall we do?"
Do you
see what a great thing gentleness is? More than any vehemence, it pricks
our hearts, inflicts
a keener wound.
For as in the case of bodies which have
become callous the man that strikes upon them does not affect the sense so
powerfully, but if he first mollify them and make them tender, then he pierces
them effectually; so in this instance also, it is necessary first to mollify.
But that which softens, is not wrath, not vehement accusation, not personal
abuse; it is gentleness. The former indeed rather aggravate the callousness,
this last alone removes it. If then you are desirous to reprove any delinquent,
approach him with all possible mildness. For see here; he gently reminds them
of the outrages they have committed, adding no comment; he declares the gift
of God, he goes on to speak of the grace which bore testimony to the event,
and so draws out his discourse to a still greater length. So they stood in
awe of the gentleness of Peter, in that he, speaking to men who had crucified
his Master, and breathed murder against himself and his companions, discoursed
to them in the character of an affectionate father and teacher. Not merely
were they persuaded; they even condemned themselves, they came to a sense of
their past behavior. For he gave no room for their anger to be roused, and
darken their judgment, but by means of humility he dispersed, as it were, the
mist and darkness of their indignation, and then pointed out to them the daring
outrage they had committed. For so it is; when we say of ourselves that we
are injured, the opposite party endeavor to prove that they have not done the
injury; but when we say, we have not been injured, but have rather done the
wrong, the others take the contrary line. If, therefore, you wish to place
your enemy (<greek>eis</greek> <greek>agpna</greek>)
in the wrong, beware of accusing him; nay (<greek>agpnisai</greek>),
plead for him, he will be sure to find himself guilty. There is a natural spirit
of opposition in man. Such was the conduct of Peter. He did not accuse them
harshly; on the contrary, he almost endeavored to plead for them, as far as
was possible. And this was the very reason that he penetrated into their souls.
You will ask, where is the proof that they were pricked? In their own words;
for what say they? "Men and brethren, what shall we do?" Whom they
had called deceivers, they call "brethren:" not that hereby they
put themselves on an equality with them, but rather by way of attracting their
brotherly affection and kindness: and besides,(1) because the Apostles had
deigned to call them by this title. And, say they, "What shall we do?" They
did not straightway say, Well then, we repent; but they surrendered themselves
to the disciples. Just as a person on the point of shipwreck, upon seeing the
pilot, or in sickness the physician, would put all into his hands, and do his
bidding in everything; so have these also confessed that they are in extreme
peril, and destitute of all hope of salvation. They did not say, How shall
we be saved? but, "What shall we do?" Here again Peter, though the
question is put to all, is the man to answer. "Repent," says he, "and
be baptized every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ." (v. 38.) He
does not yet say, Believe, but, "Be baptized every one of you." For(1)
this they received in baptism. Then he speaks of the gain; "For the remission
of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." If you are
to receive a gift, if baptism conveys remission, why delay? He next gives a
persuasive turn to his address, adding, "For the promise is unto you" (v.
39): for he had spoken of a promise above. "And to your children," he
says: the gift is greater, when these are to be heirs of the blessings. "And
to all," he continues, "that are afar off:" if to those that
are afar off, much more to you that are near: "even as many as the Lord
our God shall call." Observe the time he takes for saying, "To those
that are afar off." It is when he finds them conciliated and self-accusing.
For when the soul pronounces sentence against itself, no longer can it feel
envy. "And with many other words did he testify, and exhort, saying." (v.
40.) Observe how, throughout, the writer studies brevity, and how free he is
from ambition and display. "He testified and exhorted, saying." This
is the perfection of teaching, comprising something of fear and something of
love. "Save yourselves from this untoward generation." He says nothing
of the future, all is about the present, by which indeed men are chiefly swayed;
he shows that the Gospel releases from present(2) evils as well. "Then
they that gladly received his word were baptized; and the same day there were
added unto them about three thousand souls." (v. 41.) Think you not this
cheered the Apostles more than the miracle? "And they continued steadfastly
and with one accord in the Apostles' doctrine and fellowship."(*) (v.
42.) Here are two virtues, perseverance and concord. "In the Apostles'
doctrine," he says: for they again taught them; "and fellowship,
and in breaking of bread, and in prayer." All in common, all with perseverance. "And
fear came upon every soul" (v. 43): of those that believed. For they did
not despise the Apostles, like common men, nor did they fix their regard on
that which was visible merely. Verily, their thoughts were kindled into a glow.(8)
And as Peter had before spoken much, and declared the promises, and the things
to come, well might they be beside themselves with fear. The wonders also bore
witness to the words: "Many wonders and signs were done by the Apostles." As
was the case with Christ; first there were signs, then teaching, then wonders;
so was it now. "And all that believed were together, and had all things
common." (v. 44.) Consider what an advance was here immediately! For the
fellowship was not only in prayers, nor in doctrine alone, but also in (<greek>politeia</greek>)
social relations. "And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them
to all men, as every man had need." See what fear was wrought in them! "And
they parted them," he says, showing the (<greek>to</greek> <greek>oionomikon</greek>)
wise management: "As every man had heed." Not recklessly, like some
philosophers among the Greeks, of whom some gave up their land, others cast
into the sea great quantities of money; but this was no contempt of riches,
but only folly and madness. For universally the devil has made it his endeavor
to disparage the creatures of God, as if it were impossible to make good use
of riches. "And continuing daily with one accord in the temple" (v.
46), they enjoyed the benefit of teaching. Consider how these Jews did nothing
else great or small, than assiduously attend at the temple. For, as having
become more earnest, they had increased devotion also to the place. For the
Apostles did not for the present pluck them away from this object, for fear
of injuring them. "And breaking bread from house to house, did take their
portion of food with gladness and singleness of heart, praising God, and having
favor with all the people." (v. 47.) It seems to me that in mentioning "bread," he
here signifies fasting and hard life; for they "took their portion of
food," not of dainty fare. "With gladness," he says. Seest thou
that not the dainty fare, but the (<greek>trofhs</greek> <greek>on</greek> <greek>trufhs</greek>)
food made the enjoyment. For they that fare daintily are under punishment and
pain; but not so these. Do you see that the words of Peter contain this also,
namely, the regulation of life? ["And singleness of heart."] For
no gladness can exist where there is no simplicity. How had they "favor
with all the people?" On account of their alms deeds. For do not look
to the fact, that the chief priests for envy and spite rose up against them,
but rather consider that "they had favor with the people."--" And
the Lord added to the Church daily (<greek>epi</greek> <greek>to</greek> <greek>auto</greek>)
[together] such as should be saved.--And(1) all that believed were together." Once
more, the unanimity, the charity, which is the cause of all good things!(*)
["Now when they heard this," etc. "Then Peter said unto them," etc.]
(Recapitulation, v. 37.) What had been said was not enough. For those sayings
indeed were sufficient to bring them to faith; but these are to show what things
the believer behooves to do. And he said not, In the Cross, but, "In the
name of Jesus Christ let every one of you be baptized." (v. 38.) And he
does not put them continually in mind of the Cross, that he may not seem to
reproach them, but he says simply, "Repent: and why? That we may be punished?
No: "And let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, for
the remission of sins." And yet quite other is the law; of this world's
tribunals: but in the case of the Gospel proclamation (<greek>khrulmatos</greek>);
when the delinquent has confessed, then is he saved! Observe how Peter does
not instantly hurry over this, but he specifies also the conditions, and adds, "Ye
shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost;" an assertion accredited by
the fact, that the Apostles themselves had received that gift. ["For the
promise," etc.] (v. 39.) "The promise," i.e. the gift of the
Holy Ghost.(2) So far, he speaks of the easy part, and that which has with
it a great gift; and then he leads them to practice: for it will be to them
a ground of earnestness, to have tasted already of those so great blessings
["and with many other words did he testify," etc.] (v. 40). Since,
however, the hearer would desire to learn what was the sum and, substance of
these further words, he tells us this: ["Saying, save yourselves from
this untoward generation."] ["They then, that gladly received his
words," etc.] (v. 41) they approved of what had been said, although fraught
with terror, and after their assent given, proceed at once to baptism.(8) "And
they continued" it is written, "steadfastly in the doctrine" (or, "teaching") "of
the Apostles" (v. 42): for it was not for one day, no nor for two or three
days that they were under teaching as being persons who had gone over to a
different course of life.(4) ["And they continued with one accord in the
Apostles' doctrine," etc.] The expression is not, <greek>omou</greek> "together," but <greek>omoqumadon</greek>, "with
one accord;" ("and daily," he says [afterwards], "they
were continuing with one accord in the temple,") i. e. with one soul.(5)
And here again in his conciseness, he does not relate the teaching given; for
as young children, the Apostles nourished them with spiritual food. "And
fear came upon every soul" (v. 43): clearly, of those, as well, who did
not believe; namely, upon seeing so great a change all at once effected, and
besides in consequence of the miracles. ["And all that believed were together,
and had all things in common," etc.] (v. 44.) They are all become angels
on a sudden; all of them continuing in prayer and hearing, they saw that spiritual
things are common, and no one there has more than other, and they speedily
came together (<greek>epi</greek> <greek>to</greek> <greek>aito</greek>),
to the same thing in common, even to the imparting to all.(6) "And all
the believing" (v. 44), it says, were <greek>epi</greek> <greek>?o</greek> <greek>auto</greek>:
and to see that this does not mean that they were together in place, observe
what follows ["And had all things common"]. "All," it says:
not one with the exception of another. This was an angelic commonwealth, not
to call anything of theirs their own. Forthwith the root of evils was cut out.
By what they did, they showed what they had heard: this was that which he said, "Save
yourselves from this untoward generation."-- "And daily continuing
with one accord in the temple." (v. 46.) Since they are become three thousand,
they take them abroad now: and(1) withal, the boldness imparted by the Spirit
being great: and daily they went up as to a sacred place, as frequently we
find Peter and John doing this: for at present they disturbed none of the Jewish
observances. And this honor too passed over to the place; the eating in the
house. In what house? In the Temple.(2) Observe the increase of piety: They
cast away their riches, and rejoiced, and had great gladness, for greater were
the riches they, received without labor (<greek>apona</greek> Cat.
al. <greek>agaqa</greek>). None reproached, none envied, none grudged;
no pride, no contempt was there. As children they did indeed account themselves
to be under teaching: as new born babes, such was their disposition. Yet why
use this faint image? If you remember how it was when God shook our city with
an earthquake, how subdued all men were. (Infra, Hom. xli. § 2.) Such
was the case then with those converts. No knavery, no villany then: such is
the effect of fear, of affliction! No(3) talk of "mine" and "thine" then.
Hence gladness waited at their table; no one seemed to eat of his own, or of
another's;--I grant this may seem a riddle. Neither did they consider their
brethren's property foreign to themselves; it was(4) the property of a Master;
nor again deemed they aught their own, all was the brethren's. The poor man
knew no shame, the rich no haughtiness. This is gladness. The latter deemed
himself the obliged and fortunate party; the others felt themselves as honored
herein, and closely were they bound together. For indeed, because when people
make doles of money, there are apt to be insults, pride, grudging; therefore
says the Apostle, "Not grudgingly, or of necessity."--(2 Cor. ix.
7.) ["With gladness and simplicity of heart," etc.] See of how many
things he bears witness to them! Genuine faith, upright conduct, perseverance
in hearing, in prayers, in singleness, in cheerfulness. ["Praising God."]
(v. 47.) Two things there were which might deject them; their abstemious living,
and the loss of their property. Yet on both these accounts did they rejoice.
["And having favor with all the people."] For who but must love men
of this character, as common fathers? They conceived no malice toward each
other; they committed all to the grace of God. ["With all the people."]
Fear there was none; yea, though they had taken their position in the midst
of dangers.(5) By singleness, however, he denotes their entire virtue, far
surpassing their contempt of riches, their abstinence, and their preseverance
in prayer. For thus also they offered pure praise to God: this is to praise
God. But observe also here how they immediately obtain their reward. "Having
favor with all the people." They were engaging, and highly beloved. For
who would not prize and admire their simplicity of character; who would not
be linked to one in whom was nothing underhand? To whom too does salvation
belong, but to these? To whom those great marvels? Was it not to shepherds
that the Gospel was first preached? and to Joseph,(6) being a man of simple
mind, insomuch that he did not let a suspicion of adultery frighten him into
doing wrong? Did not God elect rustics, those artless men? For it is written, "Blessed
is every simple soul." (Prov. xi. 25.) And again, "He that walketh
simply, walketh surely." (Prov. x. 9.) "True," you will say, "but
prudence also is needed." Why, what is simplicity, I pray you, but prudence?
For when you suspect no evil, neither can you fabricate any: when you have
no annoyances, neither can you remember injuries. Has any one insulted you?
You were not pained. Has any one reviled you? You were nothing hurt. Has he
envied you? Still you had no hurt. Simplicity is a high road to true philosophy.
None so beautiful in soul as the simple. For as in regard of personal appearance,
he that is sullen, and downcast, and reserved (<greek>sunnous</greek>),
even if he be good-looking, loses much of his beauty; while he that relaxes
his countenance, and gently smiles, enhances his good looks; so in respect
of the soul, he that is reserved, if he have ten thousand good points, disfigures
them; but the frank and simple, just the reverse. A man of this last description
may be safely made a friend, and when at variance easily reconciled. No need
of guards and outposts, no need of chains and fetters with such an one; but
great is his own freedom, and that of those who associate with him. But what,
you will say, will such a man do if he fall among wicked people? God, Who has
commanded us to be simple-minded, will stretch out His hand. What was more
guileless than David? What more wicked than Saul? Yet who triumphed? Again,
in Joseph's case; did not he in simplicity approach his master's wife, she
him with wicked art? Yet what, I pray, was he the worse? Furthermore, what
more simple than was Abel? what more malicious than Cain? And Joseph again,
had he not dealt artlessly with his brethren? Was not this the cause of his
eminence, that he spoke out unsuspiciously, while they received his word sin
malice? He declared once and again his dreams unreservedly; and then again
he set off to them carrying provisions; he used no caution; he committed all
to God: nay, the more they held him in the light of an enemy, the more did
he treat them as brothers. God had power not to have suffered him to fall into
their hands; but that the wonder might be made manifest, how, though they do
their worst, he shall be higher than they: though the blow do come upon him,
it comes from another, not from himself. On the contrary, the wicked man strikes
himself first, and none other than himself. "For(1) alone," it is
said, "shall he bear his troubles." (Prov. ix. 12.) Ever in him the
soul is full of dejection, his thoughts being ever entangled: whether he must
hear aught or say aught, he does all with complaints, with accusation. Far,
very far from such do friendship and harmony make their abode: but fightings
are there, and enmities, and all unpleasantness. They that are such suspect
even themselves. To these not even sleep is sweet, nor anything else. And have
they a wife also, lo, they are enemies and at war with all: what endless jealousies,
what unceasing fear! Aye, the wicked, <greek>ponhros</greek> has
his name from <greek>ponein</greek>, "to have trouble." And,
indeed, thus the Scripture is ever calling "wickedness" by the name
of labor; as, for instance, "Under his tongue is toil and labor;" and
again, "In the midst of them is toil and labor." (Ps. x. 7; xc. 10;
and lv. 11.)
Now if
any one should wonder, whence those who had at first been of this last class,
now are so
different, let
him learn that affliction was the cause, affliction,
that school-mistress of heavenly wisdom, that mother of piety. When riches
were done away with, wickedness also disappeared. True, say you, for this is
the very thing I am asking about; but whence comes all the wickedness there
is now? How is it that it came into the minds of those three thousand and five
thousand straightway, to choose virtue, and that they simultaneously became
Christian philosophers, whereas now hardly one is to be found? how was it that
they then were in such harmony? What was it, that made them resolute and active?
What was it that so suddenly inflamed them? The reason is, that they drew near
with much piety; that honors were not so sought after as they are now; that
they transferred their thoughts to things future, and looked for nothing of
things present. This is the sign of an ardent mind, to encounter perils; this
was their idea of Christianity. We take a different view, we seek our comfort
here. The result is, that we shall not even obtain this, when the time is come. "What
are we to do?" asked those men. We, just the contrary--"What shall
we do?" What behooved to be done, they did. We, quite the reverse.(2)
Those men condemned themselves, despaired of saving themselves. This is what
made them such as they were. They knew what a gift they had received. But how
can you become like them, when you do everything in an opposite spirit? They
heard, and were forthwith baptized. They did not speak those cold words which
we do now, nor did they contrive delays (p. 47, note 3); and yet they had heard
all the requirements: but that word, "Save yourselves from this generation," made
them to be not sluggish; rather they welcomed the exhortation; and that they
did welcome it, they proved by their deeds, they showed what manner of men
they were. They entered at once the lists, and took off the coat; whereas we
do enter, but we intend to fight with our coat on. This is the cause that our
antagonist has so little trouble, for we get entangled in our own movements,
and are continually thrown down. We do precisely the same thing as he who,
having[1] to cope with a man frantic, breathing fire; and seeing him, a professed
wrestler, covered with dust, tawny, stripped, clotted with dirt from the sand
and sun, and running down with sweat and oil and dirt; himself, smelling of
perfumes, should put on his silken garments, and his gold shoes, and his robe
hanging down to his heels, and his golden trinkets on the head, and so descend
into the arena, and grapple with him. Such a one will not only be impeded,
but being taken up with the sole idea of not staining or rending his fine clothes,
will tumble at the very first onset, and withal will suffer that which he chiefly
dreaded, the damage of those his fond delights. The time for the contest is
come, and say, are you putting on your silks? It is the time of exercise, the
hour of the race, and are you adorning yourself as for a procession? Look not
to outward things, but to the inward. For by the thoughts about these things
the soul is hampered on all sides, as if by strong cords, so that she cannot
let you raise a hand, or contend against the adversary; and makes you soft
and effeminate. One may think himself, even when released from all these ties,
well off, to be enabled to conquer that impure power. And on this account Christ
too did not allow the parting with riches alone to suffice, but what saith
He? "Sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and come and follow
Me." (Mark x. 21.) Now if, even when we cast away our riches, we are not
yet in a safe position, but stand still in need of some further art and close
practice; much more, if we retain them, shall we fail to achieve great things,
and, instead thereof, become a laughing-stock to the spectators, and to the
evil one himself. For even though there were no devil, though there were none
to wrestle with us, yet ten thousand roads on all sides lead the lover of money
to hell. Where now are they who ask why the devil was made (<greek>diati</greek> <greek>o</greek> <greek>d</greek>. <greek>gegonen</greek>;)?
Behold here the devil has no hand in the work, we do it all ourselves. Of a
truth they of the hills might have a right to speak thus, who after they had
given proof of their temperance, their contempt of wealth and disregard of
all such things, have infinitely preferred to abandon father, and houses, and
lands, and wife, and children. Yet, they are the last to speak so: but the
men who at no time ought to say it, these do say it. Those are indeed wrestlings
with the devil; these he does not think worth entering into. You will say,
But it is the devil who instils this same covetousness. Well, flee from it,
do not harbor it, O man. Suppose now, you see one flinging out filth from some
upper story, and at the same time a person seeing it thrown out, yet standing
there and receiving it all on his head: you not only do not pity him, but you
are angry, and tell him it serves him right; and, "Do not be a fool," everyone
cries out to him, and lays the blame not so much on the other for shooting
out the filth, as on him for letting it come on him. But now, you know that
covetousness is of the devil; you know that it is the cause of ten thousand
evils; you see him flinging out, like filth, his noisome imaginations; and
do you not see that you are receiving on your bare head his nastiness, when
it needed but to turn aside a little to escape it altogether? Just as our man
by shifting his position would have escaped; so, do you refuse to admit such
imaginations, ward off the lust. And how am I to do this? you will ask. Were
you a Gentile, and had eyes for things present alone, the matter perhaps might
be one of considerable difficulty, and yet even the Gentiles have achieved
as much; but you--a man in expectation of heaven and heavenly bliss--and you
to ask, "How am I to repel bad thoughts?" Were I saying the contrary,
then you might doubt: did I say, covet riches, "How shall I covet riches," you
might answer, "seeing such things as I do?" Tell me, if gold and
precious stones were set before you, and I were to say, Desire lead, would
there not be reason for hesitation? For you would say, How can I? But if I
said, Do not desire it; this had been plainer to understand. I do not marvel
at those who despise, but at those who despise not riches. This is the character
of a soul exceeding full of stupidity, no better than flies and gnats, a soul
crawling upon the earth, wallowing in filth, destitute of all high ideas. What
is it you say? Are you destined to inherit eternal life; and do you say, how
shall I despise the present life for the future? What, can the things be put
in competition?[2] You are to receive a royal vest; and say you, How shall
I despise these rags? You are going to be led into the king's palace; and do
you say, How shall I despise this present hovel? Of a truth, we ourselves are
to blame in every point, we who do not choose to let ourselves be stirred up
ever so little. For the willing have succeeded, and that with great zeal and
facility. Would that you might be persuaded by our exhortation, and succeed
too, and become imitators of those who have been successful, through the grace
and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, with Whom to the Father and the Holy Ghost
together be glory, and power, and honor, now and ever, and world without end.
Amen.
Return to Volume 20 Index